Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Supreme CourtDismissedCivil Application 8 of 2019

Kenya National Capital Corporation Ltd v Galot & 5 others

Supreme Court of Kenya
26 November 2019
2,239 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya LawDownload the judgment (PDF) Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~9 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Supreme Court rejected appeal extension because applicant gave weak, unproven excuses for delay.

What this practically means

#

Kenya National Capital Corporation missed a 14-day deadline to appeal a Court of Appeal ruling. It asked the Supreme Court for more time, blaming internal meetings and power cuts from road construction. The Court said those excuses were not backed by evidence and noted a one-page notice could have been typed elsewhere. The application was dismissed with costs.

Executive summary

#
This was an application by Kenya National Capital Corporation seeking extension of time to file a notice of appeal and an application for certification of a matter of general public importance before the Court of Appeal, following the Court of Appeal's dismissal of its appeal on 8th February 2019. The applicant had 14 days to file a notice of appeal but filed the present application on 7th March 2019, citing two reasons for the delay: internal consultations and board approvals, and power disruptions due to road construction near its advocates' offices. The Supreme Court, applying the principles from Nicholas Kiptoo Arap Korir Salat v Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission & 7 others, found that the applicant failed to substantiate either reason with any annexed correspondence or evidence. The Court noted that a diligent applicant could have typed the one-page notice elsewhere and filed it. Consequently, the Court held that the applicant had not satisfactorily explained the inordinate delay and disallowed the entire application. The applicant was ordered to bear the costs of the respondents.

Questions the Court framed

#

The issues the Court set itself to decide, in its own words.

  1. 1.Whether this Court should extend time for the Applicant to file its notice of appeal?

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the Supreme Court should extend time for the applicant to file a notice of appeal against a Court of Appeal judgment.

Holding

The Court declined to extend time because the applicant failed to provide sufficient and substantiated reasons for the delay.

Reasoning

The applicant had 14 days from the Court of Appeal judgment (8th February 2019) to file a notice of appeal, expiring on 22nd February 2019. The applicant cited two reasons for the delay: internal consultations and board approvals, and power disruptions due to road construction. The Court found that neither reason was substantiated by any annexed correspondence or evidence. The Court noted that a diligent applicant could have typed the one-page notice elsewhere and filed it. Applying the Nick Salat principles, the Court held that the applicant did not satisfactorily explain the inordinate delay.

Legal principles established

#
  • Extension of time is not a right but an equitable remedy at the court's discretion.
  • The applicant must fully explain the entire period of delay with supporting evidence.
  • Unsubstantiated reasons like internal consultations or power outages are insufficient.
  • A diligent party can make alternative arrangements, such as using another location to file.
  • The burden of proof lies on the applicant to show reasonable cause for the delay.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Notice of Motion dated March 7, 2019 be and is hereby disallowed.
  2. 2.The Applicant shall bear the costs of the Respondents.

The bench

#

One judgment of the whole court — no separate or dissenting opinions.

majority

Wrote the judgment

Philomena Mbete Mwilu
P.M. MwiluDCJ
Currently serving
majority
majority
Smokin Charles Wanjala
S. WanjalaSCJ
Currently serving
majority
Njoki Susanna Ndungu
Njoki NdunguSCJ
Currently serving
majority
On appeal from
Court of Appeal at Nairobi
Nairobi Civil Appeal No. 324 of 2010
Jurisdiction invoked
Article 163(4)(b) of the Constitution

Relief refused

#

Extension of time to file a Notice of Appeal against the Court of Appeal judgment

The applicant did not satisfactorily explain the inordinate delay; the reasons given were unsubstantiated.

Extension of time to file an application for certification of a matter of general public importance before the Court of Appeal

The entire application was disallowed; the first prayer having been disallowed, the court was inclined to disallow the application in entirety.

Costs

The Applicant shall bear the costs of the Respondents.

Quotable passages

#

Verbatim from the judgment, each located to the page it appears on in the official PDF — so these can be cited and checked directly.

The Notice of Motion dated March 7, 2019 be and is hereby disallowed.
p. 7 Final orders
extension of time is not a right of a party. It is an equitable remedy that is only available to a deserving party, at the discretion of the Court
p. 6 Extension of time principles
Consequently, it is our finding that the applicant has not satisfactorily explained the inordinate delay as decided by this Court in the case of County Executive of Kisumu v County Government of Kisumu & 8 others
p. 6 Burden of explaining delay

Key timeline

#
2019-02-08
Court of Appeal dismissed Kenya National Capital Corporation's appeal.
2019-02-22
14-day deadline to file notice of appeal to Supreme Court expired.
2019-03-07
Applicant filed for extension of time, citing internal meetings and power cuts.
2023
Supreme Court disallowed the application, finding no satisfactory explanation for delay.

Practical implications

#
For lawyers

Draft extension applications with evidence

When filing for extension of time, attach supporting documents like board minutes, correspondence, or power outage reports. The court will not accept bare allegations. Also, consider alternative filing methods (e.g., courier or other advocates) to show diligence.

For businesses

Internal delays don't excuse missed deadlines

For individuals

Avoid relying on vague excuses for appeal delays

Missing a court deadline is risky. If you face obstacles like power cuts or travel issues, document them and try to file anyway (e.g., at a different location). The court expects you to find a way, not just wait.

Frequently asked questions

#
What is the deadline to file a notice of appeal to the Supreme Court in Kenya?+

You have 14 days from the date of the Court of Appeal judgment to file a notice of appeal. If you miss it, you can apply for extension of time, but you must explain the delay with evidence.

How do I apply for extension of time in the Supreme Court of Kenya?+

File a notice of motion explaining why you missed the deadline. Attach supporting documents (e.g., letters, power outage reports) and show you acted diligently. The court decides based on the Salat principles.

Can a power outage excuse missing a court appeal deadline in Kenya?+

Possibly, but only if you prove it prevented you from filing and you had no alternative means (e.g., typing elsewhere). In Galot case, the court rejected that excuse because the notice was only one page and could have been done elsewhere.

What happens if my extension of time application is denied in Kenya?+

You lose the right to appeal. The original court decision stands. You may also be ordered to pay the other side's costs. Always seek legal advice promptly after a judgment.

Later judgments citing this (1)

#

Judgments in the corpus that rely on this one. Where the Court said how it treated the authority, that is shown.

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kenya National Capital Corporation Ltd v Galot & 5 others", Case Analysis (2019). Civil Application 8 of 2019. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.orghttps://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kesc/2019/82/eng@2019-11-26

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.