Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
MagistratePartially AllowedBungoma CMC CC Nos. 202, 206, 209, 210, 211, 212, 216, 217, 218 and 221 of 2025· [2026] KEMC 764 (KLR)

Achieng & other v Owino (Civil Case E202, E206, E209, E210, E211, E212, E216, E217, E218 & E221 of 2025 (Consolidated)) [2026] KEMC 764 (KLR)

Chief Magistrate's Court (Civil), Bungoma
23 April 2026
1,866 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~7 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Ten Bungoma passengers injured in one road accident won full compensation, but courts won't pay for free documents like P3 forms and police abstracts.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This consolidated judgment of the Senior Resident Magistrate's Court at Bungoma determines ten suits (Bungoma CMC CC Nos. 202, 206, 209, 210, 211, 212, 216, 217, 218 and 221 of 2025) arising from a single road traffic accident of 27th March 2025 along the Bungoma–Mumias road at Sibembe area, in which the Plaintiffs were lawful fare-paying passengers aboard motor vehicle registration number KCV 288 P when it lost control and rolled, sustaining injuries. The Plaintiffs sued for general damages, special damages, costs and interest. The Defendant denied liability and pleaded contributory negligence. Liability was settled through a test suit (Bungoma CMC CC No. E215 of 2026), in which the court assessed liability at 100% against the Defendant; by consent the Plaintiffs' witness statements and documents were admitted, leaving only quantum for determination. On general damages, the court found the Plaintiffs proved moderate soft tissue injuries from which they had recovered, and applying the comparable-injuries principle and the damages-assessment guidelines in the cited authorities, awarded each Plaintiff Kshs. 150,000/=. On special damages, the court declined to award the cost of filling P3 forms and police abstracts, holding these free public documents cannot be charged for and no receipts proved the expenditure; it awarded only receipt-proved amounts (motor vehicle search, medical report and treatment expenses), ranging from Kshs. 6,970/= to Kshs. 8,270/= per Plaintiff. Judgment was entered against the Defendant at 100% liability with interest - general damages from judgment, special damages from filing suit - and the Plaintiffs were awarded the costs of their suits.

Key legal issues

#
01

Quantum of general damages for moderate soft tissue injuries sustained by fare-paying passengers in a road traffic accident

Holding

An award of Kshs. 150,000/= for each Plaintiff is reasonable compensation for moderate soft tissue injuries from which the Plaintiffs have recovered

Reasoning

The injuries pleaded were corroborated by uncontroverted medical evidence. Applying the principle that comparable injuries attract comparable awards, and the guidelines that damages must be neither inordinately high nor low, must compensate rather than enrich, and past awards are mere guides subject to inflation, the court aligned its award with comparable authorities where Kshs. 150,000/= had been awarded for similar soft tissue injuries.

p. 4
02

Recoverability of special damages for filling the P3 form and police abstract

Holding

Not recoverable; the court awarded only special damages proved by receipts (motor vehicle search, medical report, treatment expenses)

Reasoning

Police abstracts are issued by police officers and P3 forms are filled in public hospitals. As a matter of government policy these public documents are issued and filled free of charge. Paying for them would be an illegality from which litigants cannot benefit, and in any event no receipts were produced to prove that claimed expenditure.

p. 4
03

Proof of special damages

Holding

Special damages were awarded only to the extent proved by receipts for each suit

Reasoning

The Plaintiffs pleaded special damages for treatment expenses, medical report, filling the P3 form, police abstract and motor vehicle search. The court itemised the receipts for each suit (NTSA search of Kshs. 550/=, Dr. Sokobe's medical report of Kshs. 6,000/=, and varying Bungoma County Referral Hospital treatment expenses) and awarded only the proved amounts.

p. 5

Legal principles established

#
  • Comparable injuries should be compensated by comparable awards
  • A litigant cannot recover the cost of free public services as special damages, and such claims must in any event be proved by receipts

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Judgment entered against the Defendant at 100% liability in each of the ten suits in the series
  2. 2.General damages of Kshs. 150,000/= awarded to each Plaintiff
  3. 3.Special damages awarded per suit: E202 - Kshs. 8,160/=; E206 - Kshs. 7,040/=; E209 - Kshs. 7,820/=; E210 - Kshs. 7,860/=; E211 - Kshs. 8,270/=; E212 - Kshs. 8,190/=; E216 - Kshs. 7,020/=; E217 - Kshs. 6,970/=; E218 - Kshs. 7,490/=; E221 - Kshs. 8,040/=
  4. 4.General damages to accrue interest at court rate from the date of judgment till payment in full; special damages to accrue interest at court rate from the date of filing suit till payment in full
  5. 5.The Plaintiffs to have the costs of their respective suits

Authorities

#

Cases cited (4)

  • Denshire Muteti Wambua v Kenya Power & Lighting Co. Ltd
    [2013] eKLR
  • Kenya Power Lighting Comp. Ltd & Another v Zakayo Saitoti Naingola & Another
    [2008] eKLR
  • Surian Enterprises Ltd v Mary Bahati Peter
    (Civil Appeal No. E199 of 2021) (2023) KEHC 202426 (KLR)
  • Oloo v Arika & another
    (Civil Appeal E080 of 2024) [2026] KEHC 2889 (KLR)
Jurisdiction invoked
Admitted jurisdiction of the magistrates' court over the negligence suits (Defendant's Statement of Defence admitted this court's jurisdiction); civil claims arising from a road traffic accident

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Achieng & other v Owino (Civil Case E202, E206, E209, E210, E211, E212, E216, E217, E218 & E221 of 2025 (Consolidated)) [2026] KEMC 764 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2026). Bungoma CMC CC Nos. 202, 206, 209, 210, 211, 212, 216, 217, 218 and 221 of 2025. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kemc/2026/764/eng@2026-04-23

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.