Omonde t/a Dimonde Agencies and Auctioneers v Rafiki Microfinance Bank Ltd & another (Miscellaneous Application E592 of 2021) [2026] KEMC 546 (KLR)
The bottom line
#A Kenyan court cut an auctioneer's bill sharply, allowing only costs backed by receipts, returns of service, or the Auctioneers Rules' fee scales.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Auctioneer's commission calculation
Commission calculated per Rule 5 scale: 10% on first 100,000 and 5% on excess, totalling Kshs. 10,120.59; excess taxed off
The auctioneer charged Kshs. 14,241.18 on a principal sum of Kshs. 142,411.80. The court applied the Rule 5 scale, allowing 10% on the first Kshs. 100,000 and 5% on the excess of Kshs. 2,411.80, and taxed off the remainder.
Proof of disbursements
Items not supported by receipts, work tickets, returns of service or other documents are taxed off
Transport claim at AA rates was rejected for lack of specification of vehicle, receipts or work ticket; the court allowed a reasonable sum of Kshs. 10,000 for taxi hire instead. Other disbursements and process server's fees were likewise not proved.
Legal principles established
#- Charges must be justified by evidence such as receipts, returns of service, or statutory backing under the Auctioneers Rules; otherwise they are taxed off
Court orders
#- 1.Bill of costs taxed/assessed at Kshs. 36,099.90 (including 16% VAT)
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Auctioneers Rules, Part II - taxation/assessment of an auctioneer's bill of costs
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Omonde t/a Dimonde Agencies and Auctioneers v Rafiki Microfinance Bank Ltd & another (Miscellaneous Application E592 of 2021) [2026] KEMC 546 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2026). Not stated in judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kemc/2026/546/eng@2026-08-20
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.