Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
MagistratePartially AllowedCivil Suit No. E755 of 2023· [2025] KEMC 340 (KLR)

Makokha & another (Suing as the administrators and personal representatives of the Estate of Annah Chemtai Makokha) v Ruiru Feeds Limited & another (Civil Suit E755 of 2023) [2025] KEMC 340 (KLR)

Chief Magistrate's Court at Nakuru
11 December 2025
1,988 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~8 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Nakuru court awarded a widow's family over Kshs 1.47 million for a road death, cutting some claims because receipts and proof fell short.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The plaintiffs, legal representatives of the estate of Annah Chemtai Makokha, who died on 6th April 2021 as a passenger in a Toyota Hiace matatu that was knocked by a Tata lorry on the Nairobi–Nakuru road, sued the defendants for negligence seeking damages under the Law Reform Act and the Fatal Accidents Act, special damages, costs and interest. The defendants filed a defence blaming the deceased. At the hearing on 1st July 2025 the parties entered an oral consent closing the hearing without witnesses, agreeing liability at 90:10 in favour of the plaintiffs, leaving only quantum for determination. On special damages, the court applied the principle that special damages must be specifically pleaded and proved and awarded Kshs 334,800 from the admitted receipts. For pain and suffering, presuming the deceased died on the spot and following Sukari Industries, the court awarded Kshs 100,000, factoring inflation. For loss of expectation of life it awarded the conventional Kshs 200,000, guided by Mercy Muriuki, Moses Akumba, Patrick Kariuki Muiruri and Vincent Kipkorir Tanui. On dependency, the court rejected the defence argument that absence of birth and marriage certificates defeated the claim, finding the Chief's letter sufficient proof on a balance of probabilities that the deceased left a spouse and seven children, most of them adult students in college. Adopting the global award method agreed by both counsel, the court awarded Kshs 1,000,000 for loss of dependency. Judgment was entered for a gross total of Kshs 1,634,800, less 10% contribution, netting Kshs 1,471,320, with costs and interest to the plaintiffs, and a 30-day stay of execution granted on the defence's application.

Key legal issues

#
01

Quantum for pain and suffering

Holding

Kshs 100,000 awarded, factoring inflation, where death presumed instantaneous

Reasoning

The court presumed the deceased died on the spot since the evidence did not show how long she survived. Relying on Sukari Industries v Clyde Machimbo Juma, nominal damages apply to immediate death, with ranges of Kshs 10,000-100,000 over 20 years. Adjusting for inflation, Kshs 100,000 was awarded, subject to 10% contribution.

p. 8
02

Quantum for loss of expectation of life

Holding

Kshs 200,000 awarded as the conventional sum

Reasoning

Guided by Mercy Muriuki (conventional award Kshs 100,000) and Chitembwe J's reasoning in Moses Akumba that each life is equal regardless of occupation, and noting awards of Kshs 200,000 in Patrick Kariuki Muiruri and Vincent Kipkorir Tanui, the court awarded Kshs 200,000, factoring in the rise in the cost of living.

p. 10
03

Loss of dependency - proof and method

Holding

Global award of Kshs 1,000,000; dependency sufficiently proved by Chief's letter despite absence of certificates

Reasoning

The defendant argued dependency was unproven absent birth or marriage certificates. The court held this alone insufficient to dismiss the claim, finding the Chief's letter proved the widower and family on a balance of probabilities. Both counsel agreed on a global rather than multiplier approach; a global sum of Kshs 1,000,000 was awarded given the deceased's age of 49 and that most dependants were adults.

p. 11
04

Special damages

Holding

Kshs 334,800 proved and awarded

Reasoning

Applying the trite principle that special damages must be specifically pleaded and proved, the court examined the admitted receipts and found only Kshs 334,800 proved, less than the amounts pleaded or submitted, and awarded that sum subject to the plaintiffs' 10% contribution.

Legal principles established

#
  • Special damages must be specifically pleaded and proved
  • Nominal damages are awarded for pain and suffering and loss of expectation of life where death follows immediately after the accident
  • Lack of marriage or birth certificates alone does not defeat proof of dependency; proof on a balance of probabilities suffices

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Judgment entered for the plaintiffs against the defendants
  2. 2.Special damages of Kshs 334,800 awarded
  3. 3.Pain and suffering: Kshs 100,000 awarded
  4. 4.Loss of expectation of life: Kshs 200,000 awarded
  5. 5.Loss of dependency: Kshs 1,000,000 awarded (global award)
  6. 6.Gross total Kshs 1,634,800 less 10% contribution, net total Kshs 1,471,320
  7. 7.Costs of the suit to the plaintiffs; interest on special damages from date of filing suit and interest on general damages from date of judgment until payment in full
  8. 8.30 days stay of execution granted on application of defence counsel

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Law Reform Actnot specified
  • Fatal Accidents Actnot specified

Cases cited (7)

  • H West and Son Ltd v Shepherd
    (1964) AC 326
  • West Kenya Sugar Co. Limited v Philip Sumba Julaya (Suing as the Administrator and personal representative of the estate of James Julaya Sumba)
    [2019] eKLR
  • Sukari Industries Limited v Clyde Machimbo Juma
    [2016] eKLR
  • Mercy Muriuki & Another v Samuel Mwangi Nduati & Another (Suing as the legal Administrator of the Estate of the late Robert Mwangi)
    (2019) eKLR
  • Moses Akumba & Another v Hellen Karisa Thoya
    (2017) eKLR
  • Patrick Kariuki Muiruri & 3 Others v Attorney General
    [2018] eKLR
  • Vincent Kipkorir Tanui (Suing as the Administrator and/or Personal Representative of the Estate of Samwel Kiprotich Tanui (Deceased) v Mogogosiek Tea Factory Co Ltd & Another
    [2018] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Original civil jurisdiction of the Chief Magistrate's Court (negligence claim under the Law Reform Act and Fatal Accidents Act)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Makokha & another (Suing as the administrators and personal representatives of the Estate of Annah Chemtai Makokha) v Ruiru Feeds Limited & another (Civil Suit E755 of 2023) [2025] KEMC 340 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). Civil Suit No. E755 of 2023. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kemc/2025/340/eng@2025-12-11

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.