Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
MagistratePartially Allowed· [2023] KEMC 273 (KLR)

Colfax Holdings Limited v National Land Commission (Environment & Land Petition 003 of 2022) [2023] KEMC 273 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court, Kwale (Taxation before the Deputy Registrar)
5 July 2023
999 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~4 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court slashed a Ksh. 11.2 million legal fees bill to about Ksh. 312,000, holding that huge sums at stake don't justify high fees when a case isn't complex.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a taxation ruling by the Deputy Registrar of the Environment and Land Court at Kwale concerning a Bill of Costs dated and filed on 16 March 2023 by the Petitioner, following judgment in its favour by Lady Justice A.E. Dena on 6 March 2023 with costs against the Respondent. The underlying matter was a Petition dated 13 August 2021 which was contested and proceeded to full trial. The Respondent was served with the Bill and Notice of Taxation but did not respond, so taxation proceeded ex parte. The applicable instrument was held to be the Advocates (Remuneration) (Amendment) Order, 2014, Schedule 6, with the Petition taxed under paragraph 1(j) because the judgment characterised it as a Constitutional Petition. The taxing officer declined the drawn instruction fees of Ksh. 5,601,580/= (based on a subject matter of Ksh. 359,105,371/=), holding that the matter was neither novel nor complex despite the sums at stake, and taxed instruction fees at Ksh. 200,000/=. Get-up fees were allowed at Ksh. 66,666.67, being one third of instruction fees, given the full trial. Various attendance items and disbursements were taxed as drawn or reduced, and the Petitioner's claim for an addition of one-half of the taxed sum was disallowed as strange. In total the Bill, drawn at Ksh. 11,287,114.50, was taxed at Ksh. 311,896.67/= with Ksh. 10,975,247.50 taxed off. The Petitioner was ordered to bear his own costs of the taxation given the extent of the disallowance.

Key legal issues

#
01

Applicable remuneration order and schedule for taxation

Holding

The applicable order is the Advocates (Remuneration) (Amendment) Order, 2014, Schedule 6, and the Petition is taxed under Paragraph 1(j) thereof.

Reasoning

The matter originated from a Petition dated 13 August 2021, hence the 2014 Amendment Order applies. Although the Respondent had argued the Petition was a simple money claim, the judgment of Lady Justice Dena characterised it as a Constitutional Petition, so the taxing officer adopted paragraph 1(j) of Schedule 6 for High Court and courts of equal status, while assessing quantum under paragraph 1(j)(ii).

p. 2
02

Quantum of instruction fees

Holding

Instruction fees taxed at Ksh. 200,000/= under paragraph 1(j)(ii); the balance of Ksh. 5,401,580/= taxed off.

Reasoning

The taxing officer considered the nature of the matter: similar cases between the parties existed, so the issues were not novel; the Respondent was merely required to remit what it was bound by duty to do; and despite the huge sums at stake, the matter was not complex, requiring only diligence and standard professional skill. The matter was nonetheless of great importance to the parties given the amounts involved.

p. 2
03

Get-up fees

Holding

Get-up fees taxed at Ksh. 66,666.67, being one third of the instruction fees, since the matter went to full trial.

Reasoning

Item 2 concerned get-up fees. Because the matter was contested and went to full trial, get-up fees were computed at one third of the taxed instruction fees of Ksh. 200,000/=, yielding Ksh. 66,666.67; the balance drawn, Ksh. 1,800,526.33, was taxed off.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • A constitutional petition that is essentially a money claim is taxed under Schedule 6 Paragraph 1(j) of the ARO, but instruction fees must reflect the novelty and complexity of the matter, not merely the sums at stake.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Instruction fees taxed at Ksh. 200,000/= with Ksh. 5,401,580/= taxed off
  2. 2.Get-up fees taxed at Ksh. 66,666.67 with Ksh. 1,800,526.33 taxed off
  3. 3.Items 3 and 4 taxed as drawn at Ksh. 2,400/=
  4. 4.Item 5 taxed off
  5. 5.Items 6 and 7 taxed as drawn at Ksh. 1,490/=
  6. 6.Item 8 taxed at Ksh. 1,300/= with Ksh. 260/= taxed off
  7. 7.Items 9, 11 and 14 taxed at Ksh. 1,500/= with a total of Ksh. 1,500/= taxed off
  8. 8.Items 10, 12 and 13 taxed as drawn at Ksh. 1,540/=
  9. 9.Attendance items 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 12 and 13 taxed as drawn at Ksh. 30,000/= under paragraph 7(d) of the ARO
  10. 10.Attendance items 1 and 8 taxed off (Ksh. 6,000/=)
  11. 11.Attendance item 7 taxed at Ksh. 1,000/= under paragraph 7(c) ARO with Ksh. 2,000/= taxed off
  12. 12.Disbursement item 1 taxed as drawn at Ksh. 6,000/=
  13. 13.Petitioner's claim for an addition of one-half (Ksh. 3,762,381.50) taxed off
  14. 14.The Bill of Costs dated and filed 16 March 2023 taxed at Ksh. 311,896.67/=, with Ksh. 10,975,247.50 taxed off

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Advocates (Remuneration) (Amendment) Order, 2014Legal Notice No. 35; Schedule 6; Paragraph 1(j) and 1(j)(ii); Paragraph 7(c); Paragraph 7(d)

Cases cited (1)

  • Anarita Karimi versus Republic
Jurisdiction invoked
Taxation of a Bill of Costs under the Advocates (Remuneration) (Amendment) Order, 2014 (Legal Notice No. 35), Schedule 6, following costs awarded in the judgment of Lady Justice A.E. Dena of 6 March 2023

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Colfax Holdings Limited v National Land Commission (Environment & Land Petition 003 of 2022) [2023] KEMC 273 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2023). . Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kemc/2023/273/eng@2023-07-05

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.