Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
MagistrateOtherPetition dated 6th October, 2022 (Kwale County Assembly Election Petition)· [2023] KEMC 11 (KLR)

N’Chizumo v Independent Electoral & Boundaries Commission; Jubilee Party of Kenya & 2 others (Interested Parties) (Election Petition E001 of 2022) [2023] KEMC 11 (KLR)

Magistrates' Court (Election Court), Kwale
2 February 2023
6,850 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~27 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Petitioner filed an election petition on 6th October 2022 challenging the nomination of members to the Kwale County Assembly, seeking an order compelling the IEBC to gazette her as a duly nominated member and to allocate additional nomination slots to the Interested Parties in order of priority. The Respondent filed a Notice of Motion dated 3rd November 2022 under Section 78(3) of the Elections Act seeking dismissal of the Petition on the ground that the Petitioner deposited the required security for costs of Ksh.100,000/= on 27th October 2022, twenty-one days after filing, outside the ten-day statutory window, and further that the Petition sought orders against non-parties contrary to natural justice. The Petitioner attributed the delay to her advocate's office, whose pupil misappropriated the funds remitted for the deposit, and urged that the mistake of counsel should not be visited on an innocent client. The court framed five issues. It found that the Petitioner failed to comply with Sections 78(1) and (3) of the Elections Act. Although sympathetic to the innocent Petitioner and persuaded that courts have discretion to extend time (per Patrick Ngeta Kimanzi and Elizabeth Jebet Kibor), the court held it could not exercise that discretion because the Petitioner never filed a formal application for extension of time, and Section 59 of the Interpretation and General Provisions Act still contemplates an application being made. The natural justice ground was treated as spent, the Respondent not having canvassed it in submissions. The court dismissed the Petition, awarded the Respondent costs capped at Ksh.200,000/=, and directed a certificate of determination to issue to the IEBC and the Speaker of the Kwale County Assembly under Section 86 of the Elections Act.

Key legal issues

#
01

Compliance with Section 78(1) of the Elections Act

Holding

The Petitioner did not comply; the security of Ksh.100,000/= was deposited about twenty-one days after filing, beyond the ten-day statutory period

Reasoning

Section 78(1) and 2(c) of the Elections Act require a petitioner to deposit Ksh.100,000/= not more than ten days after presentation of the petition. The petition was filed on 6th October 2022 and the deposit made on 27th October 2022. The court held there was no doubt this constituted non-compliance with the express provisions of Sections 78(1) and (3).

p. 11
02

Whether the court can extend time for depositing security for costs

Holding

The court has discretion to extend time, but only upon a formal application by the petitioner with sufficient reason shown; no such application was filed here, so the discretion could not be exercised despite sympathy for the innocent petitioner

Reasoning

The court accepted that a mistake by an advocate should not be visited on an innocent client, and that courts retain discretion to extend the Section 78(1) timeline per Patrick Ngeta Kimanzi and Elizabeth Jebet Kibor. However, Section 59 of the Interpretation and General Provisions Act still contemplates an application being made, and the petitioner filed none. The court therefore could not, of its own motion, deem the deposit as having been made in time.

p. 13
03

Whether the Petition should be dismissed under Section 78(3) for non-deposit of security

Holding

Yes; the Respondent applied for dismissal and the Petition was dismissed under Section 78(3)

Reasoning

Having found non-compliance with Section 78(1) and no formal application for extension of time, the court held the Respondent's motion under Section 78(3) must succeed. The Respondent had applied for dismissal, satisfying the statutory precondition, so the petition was dismissed with costs.

p. 13
04

Whether the Petition should be dismissed for failure to join persons against whom adverse relief is sought

Holding

The issue was treated as spent; the Respondent did not canvass it in submissions

Reasoning

Although the Motion raised the ground that the Petition offended natural justice by seeking orders against non-parties, the Respondent did not address the court on this ground in submissions. The court declined to determine it, treating the issue as spent given its findings on the other issues.

p. 13

Legal principles established

#
  • Payment of security for costs under Section 78 of the Elections Act is a substantive requirement going to the root of the election court's jurisdiction; failure to deposit within ten days renders the petition liable to dismissal on application under Section 78(3)
  • A court may only exercise its discretion to extend time under Section 78(1) where moved by a formal application for extension of time, even where the delay is attributable to the advocate rather than the client

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Notice of Motion dated 3rd November, 2022 succeeds
  2. 2.The Petition is dismissed in line with Section 78(3) of the Elections Act for failure to deposit security for costs within the statutory period
  3. 3.The Respondent is awarded the costs of the Notice of Motion dated 3rd November, 2022 and the Petition, capped at Ksh.200,000/=, the Petition not having proceeded
  4. 4.A certificate of the determination in accordance with Section 86 of the Elections Act shall issue to the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission and the Speaker of the County Assembly of Kwale

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Elections ActSection 78(1), (2), (3), (4), (5), (2)(c); Section 86
  • Interpretation and General Provisions Act, Cap 2Section 59
  • Elections (Parliamentary and County Elections) Petitions Rules, 2017Rule 19; Rule 9(a); Rule 13

Cases cited (15)

  • Milton Kimani Waitinga v Independent Electoral & Boundaries Commission & 2 others
    [2017] eKLR
  • Robert Mwangi Kariuki v Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission & 2 others
    [2017] eKLR
  • Elizabeth Jebet Kibor v Isaac Suare Oseur & 5 others
    [2020] eKLR
  • Gabriel Muingai Simiyu v Desterio Barasa Ondwasi
    [2020] eKLR
  • Belinda Muras & 6 others v Amos Wainaina
    [1978] KLR
  • Martha Wangari Karua v IEBC
    Nyeri Civil Appeal No.1 of 2017
  • Shah v Mbogo
    [1968] EA 93
  • Patrick Ngeta Kimanzi v Marcus Mutua Muluvi & 2 others
    [2013] eKLR
  • Rupa Savings & Credit Cooperative Society v Violet Shidogo
    [2022] eKLR
  • J.G. Builders v Plan International
    [2015] eKLR
  • Philip Keipto Chemwolo & another v Augustine Kubende
    [1986] eKLR
  • Ghehona v Seventh Day Adventist Church of East Africa Union
    [2013] eKLR
  • Itute Ingu & another v Isumael Mwakavi Mwendwa
    [1994] eKLR
  • Edney Adaka Ismail v Equity Bank Limited
    [2014] eKLR
  • Fatuma Zainabu Mohamed v Ghati Dennita & 10 Others
    Kisii Election Petition No.6 of 2013 (unreported)
Jurisdiction invoked
Election court jurisdiction under the Elections Act, No. 24 of 2011 (petition challenging nomination to the Kwale County Assembly)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "N’Chizumo v Independent Electoral & Boundaries Commission; Jubilee Party of Kenya & 2 others (Interested Parties) (Election Petition E001 of 2022) [2023] KEMC 11 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2023). Petition dated 6th October, 2022 (Kwale County Assembly Election Petition). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kemc/2023/11/eng@2023-02-02

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.