Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
MagistrateAllowedElection Petition No E003 of 2022· [2022] KEMC 12 (KLR)

Mohamed v Hassan & 5 others (Election Petition E003 of 2022) [2022] KEMC 12 (KLR)

Magistrates' Court
24 November 2022
555 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~2 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan magistrate allowed an election petition to be withdrawn after community leaders brokered an out-of-court settlement, with each side paying its own costs.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a ruling of the Chief Magistrate, Hon H M Nyaberi, delivered on November 24, 2022 in Election Petition No E003 of 2022. The matter had been listed for hearing when counsel informed the court that the Petitioner intended to file an application to withdraw the petition. A Notice of Motion was subsequently filed under Rule 21 of the Elections (Parliamentary and County Elections) Petitions Rules, 2017 and Article 159(2)(c) of the Constitution, seeking leave to wholly withdraw the main petition with no orders as to costs. The application was supported by the Petitioner's affidavit sworn on November 24, 2022, which explained that out-of-court negotiations by community leaders had produced an amicable settlement of the entire dispute. Counsel for the 1st, 2nd and 3rd Respondents did not oppose the application, filed no affidavits, and did not claim costs. The 4th Respondent had never entered appearance, while counsel for the 5th and 6th Respondents was absent. The court found the application met the Rule 21 threshold, there being no objection from the parties present and ready for hearing. The court allowed the withdrawal, ordered each party to bear its own costs, and directed that the security for costs deposited in court be released to the depositor.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether leave should be granted to wholly withdraw the election petition

Holding

Leave granted; the unopposed application satisfied the threshold in Rule 21 of the 2017 Petition Rules, grounded on an out-of-court settlement by community leaders.

Reasoning

The Petitioner sought to withdraw the petition under Rule 21 of the Elections (Parliamentary and County Elections) Petitions Rules, 2017 and Article 159(2)(c) of the Constitution. Counsel for the 1st, 2nd and 3rd Respondents did not oppose and did not claim costs. The Petitioner's affidavit sworn on November 24, 2022 explained that community leaders had negotiated an amicable settlement of the entire dispute. The court, finding no objection from parties present and ready for hearing, was satisfied the threshold was met.

p. 2
02

Costs and security for costs upon withdrawal

Holding

Each party to bear its own costs; the security for costs deposited in court to be released to the depositor.

Reasoning

The 1st, 2nd and 3rd Respondents indicated they were not claiming costs and would not file affidavits to the application. The 4th Respondent never entered appearance, and counsel for the 5th and 6th Respondents was absent. On those facts the court ordered no costs as between parties and directed release of the deposited security to the depositor.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • An unopposed application to withdraw an election petition that meets the threshold under Rule 21 of the Election (Parliamentary and County Elections) Petition Rules, 2017 may be allowed with no orders as to costs.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Election Petition No E003 of 2022 with the leave of the Court is hereby withdrawn.
  2. 2.Each of the parties to bear its own costs.
  3. 3.Security of costs deposited into Court to be released to the depositor.
Jurisdiction invoked
Rule 21 of the Elections (Parliamentary and County Elections) Petitions Rules, 2017 and Article 159(2)(c) of the Constitution of Kenya

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Mohamed v Hassan & 5 others (Election Petition E003 of 2022) [2022] KEMC 12 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2022). Election Petition No E003 of 2022. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kemc/2022/12/eng@2022-11-24

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.