Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
MagistrateAllowedNot stated in judgment· [2017] KEMC 109 (KLR)

Langat Donnie Kiptoo Arap v Sikuku Martin Simotwo, Constituency Returning Officer, Langata Constituency & 2 others [2017] KEMC 109 (KLR)

Chief Magistrate's Court (Election Petition)
31 October 2017
1,046 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~4 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan election court struck out affidavit paragraphs that tried to sneak new claims into a petition after pleadings closed.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a ruling on a Notice of Motion dated 19th October 2017 filed by the 3rd Respondent in an election petition, seeking to strike out the Petitioner's Supplementary Affidavit sworn on 4th October 2017 and Further Affidavits of Jacqueline Basiye, Kevin Basiye and Edward Mwakima. The applicant contended that the affidavits introduced new causes of action never pleaded in the Petition filed on 5th September 2017, including allegations of irregular recruitment of poll officials, manipulation of vote counting, failure to display results, discrepancies in voter numbers, violence and intimidation of voters, and collusion between officials. The 1st and 2nd Respondents supported the application; the Petitioner opposed it, arguing the affidavits were consistent with the Petition and striking them out would be draconian. Relying on Rule 15(1)(h) of the Elections (Parliamentary and County Elections) Petition Rules, 2017 and the Raila Odinga Supreme Court authority, the court held that its discretion to admit additional evidence must be exercised judiciously, that new evidence must be sought within 28 days of the declaration of results, and that the affidavits raised unpleaded matters requiring responses, thereby changing the nature of the Petition. The offending paragraphs were struck out with costs. Ruling delivered by Hon. A.M. Obura (Mrs), SPM on 31st October 2017.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the Supplementary and Further affidavits introduce new causes of action not pleaded in the Petition

Holding

Yes — the offending paragraphs in the affidavits raise matters not pleaded in the Petition and amount to amending the Petition through the back door; they were struck out

Reasoning

The court noted that although parties were allowed to file further affidavits at pre-trial on 9th October 2017, there was no request to introduce new facts or evidence outside the Petition. The new allegations — including recruitment irregularities, manipulation of vote counting, violence and collusion — required the Respondents to respond to unpleaded matters. Reliance was placed on Hassan Noor Hassan v IEBC & Ali Roba and Raila Odinga v IEBC, and on the strict constitutional timelines for election petitions.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • The court's discretion to admit additional affidavits and new evidence under Rule 15(1)(h) must be exercised judiciously, and any application to adduce new evidence must be made within 28 days of the declaration of results
  • A party may not introduce new causes of action through supplementary or further affidavits that were never pleaded in the petition, as this prejudices the other parties and changes the nature of the petition

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The offending paragraphs in the Further Affidavit of JACQUELINE BASIYE, the Further Affidavit of KEVIN BASIYE (paragraphs 7, 8, 9, 10), the Further Affidavit of EDWARD MWAKIMA (paragraphs 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13) and the Petitioner's Further affidavit sworn on 4th October 2017 are struck out
  2. 2.Costs of the application to the 3rd Respondent

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Articles 47, 50, 159, 258
  • Elections ActSection 76
  • Elections (Parliamentary and County Elections) Petition Rules, 2017Rule 15(1)(h)
  • Civil Procedure Rules, 2010Order 51 Rule 1

Cases cited (2)

  • Hassan Noor Hassan v IEBC & Ali Roba, Election Petition No. 1 of 2017
  • Raila Odinga v IEBC & 3 Others, Supreme Court Petition No. 5 of 2013
Jurisdiction invoked
Articles 47, 50, 159 and 258 of the Constitution; Section 76 of the Elections Act; Elections (Parliamentary and County Elections) Petition Rules, 2017

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Langat Donnie Kiptoo Arap v Sikuku Martin Simotwo, Constituency Returning Officer, Langata Constituency & 2 others [2017] KEMC 109 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2017). Not stated in judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kemc/2017/109/eng@2017-11-03

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.