Zeynab Allyow Issack v Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission & 2 others [2017] KEMC 67 (KLR)
The bottom line
#The court threw out a challenge to a Marsabit County Assembly nomination because it was filed 48 days late, far past Kenya's strict 28-day election petition deadline.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Whether the petition was filed out of time and the effect thereof
The petition was filed about 48 days after the gazette notice of 28/8/2017 and was therefore out of time, depriving the court of jurisdiction
Article 87(2) of the Constitution and Section 76(1)(a) of the Elections Act require an election petition to be filed within 28 days of declaration of results, which for a nominated member is the gazettement of the party nomination list. The gazette notice was issued on 28/8/2017 and the petition filed 16/10/2017, about 48 days later. The timelines are mandatory; Rule 19(2) of the 2017 Rules expressly excludes extension of the filing period, and the Supreme Court has affirmed such petitions are nullities.
Whether the court has power to grant the orders sought although not provided for in Rule 7 of the Petitions Rules
The court has power to grant such orders; Rule 7 does not prescribe the orders the court may grant and Rule 8(3) is not exhaustive on the particulars of relief
The 3rd Respondent argued the orders sought were not provided for under Rule 7 and would violate the 3rd Respondent's rights under Article 38. The court held the rule does not prescribe the orders a court may grant, and Rule 8(3) is not exhaustive of the particulars of relief a petitioner may seek. This ground of the preliminary objection therefore failed.
Whether proper service was effected on the 3rd Respondent and the effect thereof
No proper service was effected, offending Article 87(3), Section 77(2) of the Elections Act and Rule 10; the failure is fatal
The Petitioner did not respond to the claim that no proper service was effected, which ought to have been done within 15 days. The court found that although the 3rd Respondent came to know of the petition through the registry, such knowledge could not cure want of service, following Patrick Ngeta Kimanzi. The failure to serve goes to the core of fair hearing and is fatal to the petition.
Whether the petition meets the prescribed format and content for election petitions
The petition was deficient in form and content, which deficiency is fatal
Rule 8 of the 2017 Rules prescribes mandatory contents, including the date of declaration of results. The petition did not indicate the gazette notice through which the 3rd Respondent was nominated, nor the date of the gazette notice, which is equivalent to the date of declaration of the election results. The court therefore held the petition deficient in the form and content required of an election petition, and that the deficiency was fatal.
Legal principles established
#- Election petitions must be filed within the constitutionally and statutorily prescribed timeframe, and those timelines are inflexible and inextensible
- The gazette notice of nomination marks the start of the 28-day period for filing a petition challenging a nomination
- Service of an election petition is a mandatory requirement whose breach is fatal; mere knowledge of the petition does not cure want of service
Court orders
#- 1.The preliminary objection of the 3rd Respondent is allowed
- 2.The Election Petition is struck out
- 3.Costs to the 3rd Respondent, capped at Kshs 50,000/= excluding disbursements, which must be proved by way of receipts
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Article 87 of the Constitution; Sections 75, 76 and 77 of the Elections Act; Elections (Parliamentary and County Elections) Petitions Rules, 2017
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Zeynab Allyow Issack v Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission & 2 others [2017] KEMC 67 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2017). Election Petition No. 3 of 2017. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kemc/2017/67/eng@2017-12-01
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.