Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
MagistrateDismissedElection Petition (number not stated in judgment)· [2017] KEMC 63 (KLR)

Githinji Johnson Kamau v Kingara Benson Kamau, Kwanusu Dickson Simiyu & Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (Election Petition 1 of 2017) (Civ) [2017] KEMC 63 (KLR)

Chief Magistrate's Court (Election Court), Kiambu County
29 November 2017
2,871 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~11 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a first-instance election court ruling by Chief Magistrate T. W. Murigi in a petition by Githinji Johnson Kamau challenging the election of Kingara Benson Kamau as member of the County Assembly for Mwihoko Ward, Ruiru Constituency, Kiambu County, following the 8th August 2017 general election. The petitioner sought scrutiny and recount of ballots, a KIEMS report, a declaration of invalid election and costs. At mention the petitioner sought to withdraw, having filed a notice to withdraw suit. Three issues were framed: whether the notice amounted to an application to withdraw; whether security for costs was deposited; and costs. The court held that withdrawal of an election petition is governed by mandatory provisions of Rules 21, 22 and 23 of the Election (Parliamentary and County) Petition Rules 2017 - leave of the court, prescribed form, service, publication and affidavits - none of which the petitioner complied with; the notice to withdraw a suit was struck out as fatally defective. The petitioner admitted he had not deposited the security for costs required by section 78 of the Election Act and Rule 13(1) of the Rules, and the court, applying authority that security for costs is a substantive jurisdictional requirement, dismissed the petition. Costs were awarded to the respondents on the principle that costs follow the event, and a certificate under section 86(1) of the Election Act was directed to issue to the IEBC Chairperson and the Speaker of the Kiambu County Assembly. Right of appeal within 30 days was noted.

Key legal issues

#
01

Withdrawal of an election petition

Holding

A mere notice to withdraw a suit does not amount to a lawful application to withdraw an election petition; the notice was struck out as fatally defective.

Reasoning

Rules 21, 22 and 23 of the Election (Parliamentary and County) Petition Rules 2017 prescribe mandatory steps: leave of the court, an application in Form 5 stating grounds, service on respondents, publication, and supporting affidavits. The petitioner's notice to withdraw suit satisfied none of these, and the court found his claim that responses had not been filed contradicted by the record.

p. 5
02

Deposit of security for costs

Holding

Non-deposit of security for costs within ten days of filing is fatal; the petition was dismissed.

Reasoning

Section 78 of the Election Act requires a petitioner to deposit security within ten days, and section 78(3) bars further proceedings on default. Rule 13(1) of the 2017 Rules reinforces this. The petitioner admitted non-compliance, and the court adopted the line of authority that security for costs is a substantive jurisdictional requirement.

p. 6
03

Costs

Holding

The petitioner was ordered to pay the respondents' costs.

Reasoning

The court applied the cardinal principle that costs follow the event, finding that the petition caused the respondents to incur expenses in instructing counsel, preparing responses, submissions, research and court attendance.

p. 7

Legal principles established

#
  • A petition shall not be withdrawn without leave of the election court, and the statutory rules on withdrawal are mandatory.
  • A notice to withdraw a suit is not a valid application to withdraw an election petition where it does not comply with Rules 21, 22 and 23.
  • Failure to deposit security for costs within ten days goes to the root of the court's jurisdiction and warrants dismissal of the petition.
  • Costs follow the event.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Notice to withdraw a suit is struck out
  2. 2.The petition is dismissed with costs to the respondents
  3. 3.A certificate under S. 86(1) of the Election Act to issue forthwith to the Chairperson IEBC and the Speaker, County Assembly, Kiambu

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Election ActS. 78(1), 78(2), 78(3), 86(1)
  • Election (Parliamentary and County) Petition Rules 2017Rules 13(1), 21, 22, 23, 32
  • Election (Parliamentary and County Election) Petition Regulation 2017Rules 13, 21, 22, 23
  • Election Petition Rules 2013Rules 23, 24
  • Civil Procedure Code / CPCOrder 11

Cases cited (7)

  • Anastacia Wanjiru Mwangi –vs- IEBC & Another
    (2013) eKLR
  • Moses Siasi –vs- IEBC and 2 others
    (2013) eKLR
  • Esposito Franco –vs- Amason Kingi Jeffa & 2 others
    Malindi Election Petition No. 1 of 2008 eKLR
  • Rotich Samuel Kimutai –vs- Ezekiel Lenyongopeta & 2 others
    Civil Appeal No. 273 of 2003 eKLR
  • Evans Nyambaso Zekadiah & Another –vs- IEBC & 2 others
  • Jane Naicar Eshuchi –vs- Maurice Sakwa & 2 others
  • Fatuma Sainabu Muhammed –vs- Ghati Dennituli & 10 others
    Kisii Election Petition No. 6 of 2013 (unreported)
Jurisdiction invoked
Election Act, No. 24 of 2011 (election court jurisdiction over County Assembly election petitions); Election (Parliamentary and County) Petition Rules, 2017

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Githinji Johnson Kamau v Kingara Benson Kamau, Kwanusu Dickson Simiyu & Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (Election Petition 1 of 2017)  (Civ) [2017] KEMC 63 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2017). Election Petition (number not stated in judgment). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kemc/2017/63/eng@2017-11-29

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.