Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
KadhiPartially AllowedNot stated in the judgment· [2024] KEKC 28 (KLR)

In re Estate of the Late Mohamed Mohamed Al Amin (Deceased) (Succession Cause E020 of 2023) [2024] KEKC 28 (KLR)

Kadhi's Court
13 December 2024
658 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~3 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan Kadhi's Court ordered an estate beneficiary to pay a widow Kshs. 251,422.50 in rental income she was owed from her late husband's estate.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This ruling by Principal Kadhi AJ Ishaq Hussein resolves a Notice to Show Cause arising from the distribution of the estate of the late Mohamed Mohamed Alamin under Islamic Sharia Law. A judgment of 6th July 2023 had established beneficiaries' entitlements, and a decree of 27th May 2024 had ordered valuation of two motor vehicles, filing of accounts, and refund of rental shares. The court framed three issues: the Applicant widow's share of rental income from January 2021 to December 2023, the correctness of the 2024 accounts, and her share of the motor vehicles. Her entitlement to 6.25% of rental income (half of one-eighth under Surat An-Nisa, Verse 12) was undisputed. On quantum, the court applied Daniel Toroitich Arap Moi v Mwangi Stephen Muriithi on uncontroverted affidavit evidence but found corroboration in the 1st Respondent's Replying Affidavit, the 2nd Respondent's accounts, and the 3rd Respondent's own admission in open court. Invoking Section 112 of the Evidence Act, the court placed the burden on the 3rd Respondent, who admitted receiving the funds, to prove a different amount. The 2024 accounts were held deficient under Order 44 Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Rules for lack of vouchers and incomplete disclosure. The court ordered the 3rd Respondent to pay Kshs. 251,422.5 within 60 days, directed sale of motor vehicle KCL unless a beneficiary buys out others' shares within 30 days, and required the 2nd Respondent to file proper 2024 accounts within 30 days. No costs order was made.

Key legal issues

#
01

Applicant's share of rental income 2021-2023

Holding

Applicant entitled to 6.25% (half of one-eighth) of rental income; Kshs. 251,422.5 awarded against the 3rd Respondent

Reasoning

The 6.25% entitlement was undisputed. The court had the 1st Respondent's Replying Affidavit confirming the amount, the 2nd Respondent's accounts showing quarterly payments of Kshs. 335,230, and the 3rd Respondent's own admission in open court. Under Section 112 of the Evidence Act the burden lay on the 3rd Respondent, having admitted receipt, to prove a different amount.

p. 2
02

Accuracy of 2024 accounts

Holding

The 2024 accounts failed the required standard; proper accounts with supporting documentation ordered

Reasoning

The accounts did not meet Order 44 Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Rules, which mandates proper vouchers for all items of disbursement. Deficiencies included lack of supporting documentation for claimed expenses, incomplete disclosure of rental income sources, unexplained historical payments and inadequate explanation of audit fees.

p. 2
03

Applicant's share in the motor vehicles

Holding

Applicant's 6.25% share valued at Kshs. 95,000 (KBX, already settled) and Kshs. 32,500 (KCL, pending); sale of KCL ordered with buy-out option

Reasoning

Valuation fixed the Toyota Hilux at Kshs. 1,520,000 and the Probox at Kshs. 520,000. The Applicant's 6.25% share was computed accordingly; the Hilux share had already been settled while the Probox share was outstanding, prompting the sale-or-buy-out order.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • Where a fact is particularly within a person's knowledge, the onus of proving that fact rests upon that person
  • Mere non-denial of affidavit evidence does not render it true

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The 3rd Respondent shall pay the Applicant Kshs. 251,422.5 being her share of rental income from January 2021 to December 2023, within 60 days of this ruling.
  2. 2.The motor vehicle KCL xxxx shall be sold and proceeds distributed according to the beneficiaries' shares, unless any beneficiary exercises the option to buy out others' shares within 30 days of this ruling.
  3. 3.The 2nd Respondent shall file proper accounts for 2024 with supporting documentation within 30 days of this ruling.
Jurisdiction invoked
Distribution of the estate of the late Mohamed Mohamed Alamin in accordance with Islamic Sharia Law

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "In re Estate of the Late Mohamed Mohamed Al Amin (Deceased) (Succession Cause E020 of 2023) [2024] KEKC 28 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). Not stated in the judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kekc/2024/28/eng@2024-12-13

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.