Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
KadhiPartially AllowedNot stated in judgment· [2019] KEKC 30 (KLR)

HAS v AJD [2019] KEKC 30 (KLR)

Kadhi's Court
16 April 2018
410 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~2 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kericho Kadhi's Court granted a woman a divorce and custody after her husband deserted the family for seven years, but made no specific maintenance order.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This was a divorce and children maintenance matter before the Kericho Kadhi's Court. The claimant sought two prayers: that the respondent take responsibility for his children, and the dissolution of the marriage with issuance of a divorce certificate. The respondent was served with the plaint and summons but refused to sign the notice to summons; service was proved by an affidavit of services sworn by Benard Obiero, and the matter proceeded undefended. The parties married under Islamic Law in April 2004 at Kericho and had two children. The claimant testified that the respondent became abusive and violent and abandoned the family seven years earlier, after which she fled to Eldoret to live with her mother, and that he had never maintained the children during that period. The court held that the respondent's seven-year desertion offended the objectives of marriage and violated the claimant's right to a fruitful marital life, invoking the Islamic objectives of marriage (Qur'an, Rum 30:21) and Article 88 of the Islamic Charter on Family, which entitles a wife to request divorce where the husband refuses financial support or is long absent. The court also observed that upbringing of children is a shared responsibility under the Children Act. The marriage was pronounced and declared dissolved with effect from 16th April 2017 (29th Rajab 1439), custody of the children was granted to the claimant, and costs of the suit were awarded to the claimant. Judgment was delivered at Kericho on 16th April 2018 by Resident Kadhi M. Mohamed Sambu.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the marriage should be dissolved on grounds of the respondent's abuse and desertion

Holding

The marriage was dissolved effective 16th April 2017 (29th Rajab 1439)

Reasoning

The claimant testified that the respondent became abusive and violent and abandoned the family seven years prior, never caring for the children. The court held that such desertion offends the objectives of marriage and violates the claimant's right to a fruitful marital life, and relied on Islamic objectives of marriage (Qur'an, Rum 30:21) and Article 88 of the Islamic Charter on Family permitting divorce where the husband refuses financial support or is long absent.

p. 1
02

Custody and maintenance of the children

Holding

Custody granted to the claimant

Reasoning

The court observed that parental responsibility is shared under the Children Act, and that the claimant has been living with and caring for the children while the respondent neglected them for over seven years. On that basis custody was awarded to the claimant.

p. 1

Legal principles established

#
  • Desertion of the family by a spouse for seven years offends the objectives of marriage and violates the claimant's right to a fruitful marital life
  • A wife may request divorce where the husband refuses to provide financial support or has long been absent, per Article 88 of the Islamic Charter on Family

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The parties' marriage is pronounced and declared dissolved with effect from 16th April 2017, corresponding with 29th Rajab, 1439
  2. 2.Custody of the children is granted to the claimant
  3. 3.Costs of the suit awarded to the claimant

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Children ActNot specified
Jurisdiction invoked
Islamic Law marriage dissolution jurisdiction of the Kadhi's Court

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "HAS v AJD [2019] KEKC 30 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2018). Not stated in judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kekc/2019/30/eng@2019-05-16

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.