Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
KadhiPartially AllowedSuccession Cause No. 24 of 2019· [2019] KEKC 19 (KLR)

In re Estate of Ali Adan Mohamed (Deceased) [2019] KEKC 19 (KLR)

Kadhi's Court at Moyale
31 July 2019
1,348 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~5 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Moyale Kadhi's Court ruled that money raised for a family after someone dies is not part of the estate, and the widowed mother keeps custody of her children.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The petitioner, widow of the late Ali Adan Mohamed (who died on 10th August 2016), filed a notice of motion in the Kadhi's Court at Moyale seeking protection of property for herself and her two daughters. She explained that after the deceased's death, well-wishers raised approximately Kshs 1,300,000 in Nairobi and Moyale; part was used to buy a plot for Kshs 250,000 and build a residential house, and the balance was deposited in a joint Equity Bank account of which she and the respondent, the deceased's mother, were signatories. She also claimed the deceased had owned two camels. The respondent denied the camels, disputed the amount raised, and urged that the plot be distributed among beneficiaries and that she be granted custody of the children. The court framed two issues: whether posthumous fundraising proceeds constitute the deceased's estate, and who is entitled to custody of the two daughters. Applying both the Law of Succession Act's definition of 'estate' and the Islamic concept of tarikah, the Kadhi held that funds raised after death never accrued to the deceased and cannot form his estate; the plot therefore belongs to the petitioner and her children. The joint account balance was ordered shared equally. On the camels, the respondent took the denial oath under Sharia law after the petitioner failed to prove the claim. On custody, Islamic law favours the mother, and absent evidence disqualifying the petitioner, custody was granted to her. Judgment delivered on 31st July 2019 by Hon. A. D. Wako, Senior Resident Kadhi.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether posthumous fundraising proceeds constitute the estate (tarikah) of the deceased

Holding

They do not; the plot bought with such proceeds belongs to the petitioner and her children, while the balance in the joint account is shared equally between petitioner and respondent

Reasoning

The court defined estate under the Law of Succession Act as the free property of a deceased person and under Islamic law as what the deceased leaves behind. The fundraising occurred after the death, so the proceeds never accrued to the deceased and cannot be subjected to succession. The joint account balance was however shared equally between the two signatories.

p. 2
02

Custody of the deceased's two daughters

Holding

Custody granted to the petitioner (the mother)

Reasoning

Islamic law prefers the mother for custody as she is more compassionate and better able to raise small children. The conditions of custody are being an accountable adult of sound mind, good character, and able to fulfil obligations towards the child. The respondent adduced no evidence that the petitioner failed to meet these conditions, so custody was restored to her.

p. 3
03

Whether the deceased owned camels

Holding

Claim not proved; the respondent took the denial oath under Sharia law

Reasoning

The petitioner alleged the deceased left two camels in the custody of a clan member. The respondent denied this and, after the petitioner failed to prove the claim, took the denial oath as required by Sharia law, which defeated the claim. Nothing was therefore available for distribution in terms of camels.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • Proceeds of a fundraising conducted by well-wishers after a person's death do not form part of the deceased's estate (tarikah)
  • Under Islamic law, a mother has the primary right to custody of children, subject to the conditions of being an accountable adult of sound mind, good character and able to fulfil obligations towards the child

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Declared that the plot bought with proceeds of the post-death fundraising cannot be considered part of the deceased's estate and belongs to the petitioner and her children
  2. 2.Ordered that the remaining money in the joint Equity Bank account be shared equally between the petitioner and the respondent
  3. 3.Granted the right of custody of the two daughters of the deceased to the petitioner
  4. 4.Refused the claim that the deceased owned camels after the respondent took the denial oath
Jurisdiction invoked
Law of Succession Act (as applicable to Muslims) and Islamic law of succession; Kadhi's Court jurisdiction over the estate of a Muslim deceased

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "In re Estate of Ali Adan Mohamed (Deceased) [2019] KEKC 19 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2019). Succession Cause No. 24 of 2019. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kekc/2019/19/eng@2019-07-31

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.