Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
IndustrialOtherCBA No. CA 248 of 2014· [2014] KEIC 10 (KLR)

Kenafric Industries Limited v Bakery Confectionary Food Manufacturing and Allied Workers Union (Cause 248 of 2014) (Employment and Labour) [2014] KEIC 10 (KLR)

Industrial Court of Kenya
24 December 2014
1,706 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~7 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This was an application for registration of a Collective Bargaining Agreement No. CA 248 of 2014 covering the period 1st January 2015 to 31st December 2016, negotiated and signed between the parties on 17th December 2012. When the CBA came up for registration on 6th November 2014, the Employer objected and sought a 45-day deferment to renegotiate 16 clauses. The Union opposed, arguing the CBA was voluntarily negotiated and signed, forwarded through the Ministry of Labour in compliance with the guidelines, and that renegotiation before registration was premature; it relied on Said Ndege v Steel Makers Limited [2014] eKLR. The Court analysed the definitions of a collective agreement in the Labour Relations Act and the Employment Act and Rule 35 of the Industrial Court (Procedure) Rules 2010. It held that the substantive law is Section 60 of the Labour Relations Act, that Rule 35 is contra statute as an attempt by delegated authority to rewrite the law, and referred the Rules to the Rules Committee for amendment. The Court held that a collective bargaining agreement attains legal enforceability only upon registration by the Court, and criticised the two-year delay in presenting the CBA as contrary to statute, noting that delay allowed the Employer to change its mind. The Court deferred registration of the CBA for 45 days to allow renegotiation, directed that the existing CBA continue in full force pending resolution, and ordered each party to bear their own costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

When a collective bargaining agreement becomes legally enforceable

Holding

The CBA becomes binding and enforceable only upon registration by the Industrial Court, effective from the date agreed by the parties under Section 59(5) of the Labour Relations Act

Reasoning

The Court compared the definitions of 'collective agreement' in the Labour Relations Act and the Employment Act and noted the Rules placed the onus of registration on the Minister. Holding the substantive law on collective bargaining agreements to be Section 60 of the Labour Relations Act, the Court found that enforceability attaches only on registration; prior to that the CBA is merely an intention of the parties.

p. 5
02

Conflict between Rule 35 of the Industrial Court (Procedure) Rules 2010 and Section 60 of the Labour Relations Act 2007

Holding

Rule 35 is contra statute and inconsistent with Parliament's intention in Section 60; it was referred to the Rules Committee for amendment

Reasoning

The Court held that delegated legislation cannot vary the primary statute. Whereas Section 60 requires every collective agreement to be submitted to the Industrial Court for registration within fourteen days of conclusion, Rule 35 places the lodging obligation on the Minister. The Court found the Rules attempted to rewrite the law and referred the matter to the Rules Committee.

p. 5
03

Effect of delayed presentation of a concluded CBA for registration

Holding

The two-year delay in presenting the 2012 CBA for registration breached the statutory fourteen-day requirement and justified deferring registration to allow renegotiation

Reasoning

The CBA covering 2015-2016 was signed in December 2012 but only presented for registration in November 2014. The Court observed that the delay allowed the Employer to have a change of mind on previously agreed issues, and that the best practice is to register a CBA shortly after conclusion. Registration was deferred for 45 days with the existing CBA continuing in force.

p. 6

Legal principles established

#
  • A collective bargaining agreement attains legal enforceability only upon registration by the Industrial Court; before registration it is a mere expression of the parties' intention
  • Rule 35 of the Industrial Court (Procedure) Rules 2010 conflicts with Section 60 of the Labour Relations Act 2007 and cannot override the substantive statute
  • A collective agreement must be submitted for registration within fourteen days of its conclusion as required by statute

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Registration of the CBA deferred for 45 days to allow the parties to renegotiate the CBA and present it for registration
  2. 2.The existing CBA to hold and continue to have full force of law pending resolution of the dispute within the 45 days
  3. 3.Each party to bear their own costs
  4. 4.The Ruling referred to the Rules Committee of the Industrial Court to prepare a suitable amendment to Rule 35 of the Industrial Court (Procedure) Rules 2010 to reflect the intention of Parliament
Jurisdiction invoked
Statutory jurisdiction to register collective agreements under Section 60 of the Labour Relations Act 2007 and the Industrial Court (Procedure) Rules 2010

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kenafric Industries Limited v Bakery Confectionary Food Manufacturing and Allied Workers Union (Cause 248 of 2014)  (Employment and Labour) [2014] KEIC 10 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2014). CBA No. CA 248 of 2014. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keic/2014/10/eng@2014-12-24

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.