Charles Machira Muthoni v Republic
The bottom line
#High Courts can reduce default jail sentences and substitute them with time served to help decongest prisons during a crisis.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Whether the High Court's revisionary jurisdiction could be invoked to substitute a default sentence with time served
Yes - the court exercised its powers under Article 159(2) of the Constitution and Sections 362 & 364 of the Criminal Procedure Code to set aside the default sentence.
The convict had been sentenced to a fine of Kshs.30,000 with one year imprisonment in default and had not paid the fine. In light of the COVID-19 crisis and the need to de-congest prisons, the court examined the trial court record and exercised its revisionary powers to substitute the default sentence with time already served, ordering the convict's release.
Legal principles established
#- The High Court may exercise revisionary powers under Section 362 and 364 of the Criminal Procedure Code, read with Article 159(2) of the Constitution, to set aside a default sentence in furtherance of prison decongestion during the COVID-19 crisis.
Court orders
#- 1.The default sentence of one year imprisonment is set aside and substituted with the time already served
- 2.The convict shall be set at liberty forthwith unless otherwise lawfully held
- On appeal from
- null
- null
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Article 159(2) of the Constitution and Sections 362 & 364 of the Criminal Procedure Code
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Charles Machira Muthoni v Republic", Case Analysis (2020). Criminal Revision No. 39 of 2020. Source:
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.