Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
High CourtPartially AllowedSuccession Cause (Machakos) – Notice of Motion dated 18th December 2019

In re Estate of the Deceased (Stay of Execution Pending Appeal)

High Court of Kenya
27 April 2020
2,439 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~10 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

If you seek to pause a court decision, you must specifically justify why the entire ruling, not just the disputed parts, should be stopped.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The High Court at Machakos, Odunga J, ruled on a Notice of Motion dated 18th December 2019 in which the 2nd Administrator sought stay of execution of the court's ruling of 7th November 2019 confirming a grant of letters of administration and its annexed schedule of distribution, pending an intended appeal to the Court of Appeal. The applicant contended that the Plots at Kativani and Masimba, registered in her name, did not form part of the estate, and that Machakos/Kiandani/2783 would be transmitted to Bernard Muteti Mungata, whom she claimed was not a beneficiary; she also faulted the court's distribution under Section 40 of the Law of Succession Act and its finding that it lacked jurisdiction over the legality of the sale of Machakos/Kiandani/2783. The 1st Administrator opposed, asserting the parcel had been transferred in 2009, that the applicant was in occupation of the other properties, and that no irreparable damage was shown. Applying Order 42 rule 6(2) and the overriding objective in sections 1A and 1B of the Civil Procedure Act, and relying on Vishram Ravji Halai, Samvir Trustee, IL Nwesi and Suleiman vs. Amboseli Resort, the court held that an applicant must justify staying the whole decision. It granted stay only in respect of the Plots at Kativani and Masimba and Machakos/Kiandani/2783, maintaining the status quo, conditional on filing the appeal within 45 days, and dismissed the application otherwise with no order as to costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Scope of stay pending appeal

Holding

Stay granted only over the properties the applicant specifically contested; the rest of the decision takes effect

Reasoning

The court held that a blanket stay cannot issue where the applicant has taken issue only with certain parcels. The court must balance the parties' interests and opt for the lower rather than the higher risk of injustice, citing Suleiman vs. Amboseli Resort Limited. Since no issue was raised on the other parcels, no basis existed to stay the decision in respect of them.

p. 3
02

Conditional stay where appeal not yet filed

Holding

Stay made conditional on filing the intended appeal within 45 days

Reasoning

Because the appeal had not yet been filed, the court imposed a condition that the intended appeal be filed within 45 days of the ruling, in default of which the stay would lapse. This preserves the applicant's appellate rights while protecting the successful party from indefinite obstruction of the confirmed distribution.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • Stay of execution pending appeal requires substantial loss, absence of unreasonable delay and security, but the court must also apply the overriding objective and weigh the consequences of granting or refusing stay
  • An applicant for stay must justify why the whole decision, and not merely the parts adverse to him, should be stayed

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Stay of the decision of 7th November 2019 in so far as it affects Plots at Kativani and Masimba and Machakos/Kiandani/2783; status quo maintained as to those properties
  2. 2.Stay conditional on the intended appeal being filed within 45 days from the date of the ruling, failing which the stay lapses
  3. 3.Application otherwise dismissed
  4. 4.No order as to costs
Jurisdiction invoked
Inherent jurisdiction under sections 1A and 1B of the Civil Procedure Act and Order 42 rule 6(2) of the Civil Procedure Rules, in a succession cause

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "In re Estate of the Deceased (Stay of Execution Pending Appeal)", Case Analysis (2020). Succession Cause (Machakos) – Notice of Motion dated 18th December 2019. Source: 

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.