Miscellaneous Application (in a criminal matter - applicant seeking leave to appeal out of time)

High Court of Kenya

1 September 2020

RAR.E. Aburili

169 words in judgment

View original judgment Read on Kenya Law Watch case

AI-assisted case brief

·~1 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

Courts can grant you a chance to appeal even if you are late, provided the delay was caused by confusion, not negligence.

What this practically means

Executive summary

The applicant, a prisoner convicted on 6 September 2019, sought leave to appeal out of time against the judgment of the lower court. He had earlier approached the High Court through Miscellaneous Application No. 37/2020, which was dismissed on 6 July 2020 because the application was mixed with an application under Rule 113 of the Court of Appeal Rules. The court also considered a communication from the Officer Incharge of Kisumu Maximum Prisons dated 20 July 2020, which indicated that the proper application was one for leave to appeal out of time from the judgment of the lower court. R.E. Aburili J, accepting that the earlier dismissal arose from confusion in the framing of the application rather than the applicant's own inaction, granted the applicant the benefit of doubt and allowed leave to file an appeal out of time. The intended appeal was to be filed within 14 days, failing which the order would lapse. The registry was directed to notify the prisons and to extract the order, and the file was closed. No costs order was made. The ruling is a short ex parte-style leave decision and establishes no new proposition of law.

Key legal issues

Whether delay in seeking leave to appeal should be excused

Holding

Leave to appeal out of time granted, the court giving the applicant the benefit of doubt due to earlier confusion in filing

Reasoning

The applicant was convicted on 6/9/2019 and filed Misc Application No. 37/2020, which was dismissed on 6/7/2020 because it was mixed with an application under Rule 113 of the Court of Appeal Rules. The court considered a communication from the Officer Incharge Kisumu Maximum Prisons dated 20/7/2020 and, viewing the earlier misfiling as confusion not attributable to the applicant, excused the delay.

p. 2

Legal principles established

Court orders

1.Leave granted to the applicant to file an appeal out of time
2.Intended appeal to be filed within 14 days, in default the order lapses
3.Registry to notify prisons and to extract the order
4.File closed

On appeal from: Lower court (magistrates' court, not named); null
Jurisdiction invoked: Inherent jurisdiction to extend time for filing appeal (leave to appeal out of time)

Key timeline

Practical implications

Frequently asked questions

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Miscellaneous Application (in a criminal matter - applicant seeking leave to appeal out of time)", Case Analysis (2020). Misc Application No. 37/2020. Source:

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.