REUBEN CHEGE MARITHA v V K HIRANI SUPPPLIERS
The bottom line
#Employment disputes and work injury appeals must go to the Employment and Labour Relations Court, not the High Court.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Jurisdiction of the High Court over an appeal arising from an employment injury claim
The High Court lacks jurisdiction; the dispute falls within the exclusive jurisdiction of the ELRC and the appeal was transferred there.
The court invoked Article 162(2) of the Constitution and Section 12(1) of the Employment and Labour Relations Court Act, 2011, which confer exclusive original and appellate jurisdiction on the ELRC over disputes arising out of employment between employer and employee. Relying on the Supreme Court's decision in Republic v Karisa Chengo, it held that the ELRC and High Court are distinct autonomous courts, and the High Court should not clothe itself with jurisdiction reserved to the ELRC.
Legal principles established
#- The ELRC has exclusive jurisdiction to hear appeals from courts and tribunals on labour and employment disputes, and the High Court cannot entertain matters reserved to the ELRC.
Court orders
#- 1.The Court declines jurisdiction to hear the Appeal
- 2.The Appeal is transferred to the Employment and Labour Relations Court, Mombasa, for final determination
- 3.Costs shall abide the outcome of the Appeal
- On appeal from
- Chief Magistrate's Court, Mombasa
- SRMCC No.527 of 2013
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Article 162(2) of the Constitution as read with Sections 12 and 87 of the Employment and Labour Relations Court Act, 2011
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "REUBEN CHEGE MARITHA v V K HIRANI SUPPPLIERS", Case Analysis (2020). Not stated in the judgment (instant Appeal from Mombasa SRMCC No.527 of 2013). Source:
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.