Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
High CourtPartially AllowedApplication dated 14th January 2019 (High Court, Kitale)

Tuwai Company Ltd - Application by Directors/Shareholders (ruling on joinder and freezing of company account)

High Court of Kenya
13 May 2019
672 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~3 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

When directors sue over company funds, the company itself must be added as a party to the case.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is an interlocutory ruling by the High Court at Kitale (H.K. Chemitei J) on an application dated 14th January 2019 in which the applicants, directors and shareholders of Tuwai Company Ltd, sought to restrain the 1st to 3rd respondents from operating the company's account at Cooperative Bank, Kitale Branch. The 1st respondent opposed the application by replying affidavit, contending that the applicants lacked locus because they were not bona fide members or validly elected directors, and alleged embezzlement from the company by some of the applicants. Rather than determine the merits, the court held that Tuwai Company Ltd itself is a necessary party, since all parties except the 4th defendant (the bank) are its directors and/or shareholders and the account sought to be frozen belongs to the company. Relying on Order 1 rule 10(2) of the Civil Procedure Rules, the court granted the applicants leave to enjoin the company as defendant or plaintiff within 14 days and to serve the defendants. To secure the interests of the parties and the company, the court ordered a freezing of the account pending hearing of the application and further directions, with costs in the cause. The court noted myriad suits touching the company within its jurisdiction and reserved merits and directions until the company is joined.

Key legal issues

#
01

Joinder of a necessary party under Order 1 rule 10(2)

Holding

Tuwai Company Ltd is a necessary party and the applicants are granted leave to enjoin it within 14 days

Reasoning

The court found that all parties except the 4th defendant are directors and/or shareholders of Tuwai Ltd, and the account they seek to freeze belongs to the company. Although widely mentioned, the company had not been made a party for unknown reasons. Its presence would help the court effectively settle the issues, especially given myriad suits touching the company within the court's jurisdiction.

p. 1
02

Whether to decide the merits of the freezing application at this stage

Holding

The court declined to determine the merits until the company is on board

Reasoning

The court held that wading into the merits or demerits of the application would be premature before the necessary party is joined. However, to secure the interests of the parties and the company, it ordered a freezing of the account as a temporary measure pending hearing and further directions.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • A company whose account is sought to be frozen, and whose directors/shareholders are the litigating parties, is a necessary party whose presence enables the court to effectively and completely adjudicate upon all questions in the suit.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The applicants are granted leave to enjoin Tuwai Company Ltd as a defendant or as a plaintiff, whichever applies, within 14 days from the date of the ruling, and thereafter serve the defendants
  2. 2.Freezing of account number [particulars withheld] at Cooperative Bank Kitale Branch pending the hearing and determination of the application and/or further directions from the court
  3. 3.Costs in the cause
Jurisdiction invoked
Order 1 rule 10(2) of the Civil Procedure Rules (inherent power to add a necessary party)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Tuwai Company Ltd - Application by Directors/Shareholders (ruling on joinder and freezing of company account)", Case Analysis (2019). Application dated 14th January 2019 (High Court, Kitale). Source: 

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.