Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCDismissedAppeal No. E001 of 2026· [2026] KEELRC 2650 (KLR)

The Chairman Masaba Farmers Co-operative Union Limited & 2 others v Peter Ombaba Nyaoko

Employment & Labour Relations Court of Kenya at Kisii
29 September 2026
2,410 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~10 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a first appeal to the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Kisii against the judgment of Hon. Nyariki Joshua (SRM) in Kisii MELRC No. E002 of 2022, delivered on 27th August 2025, in which the Respondent employee successfully sued the Appellants, his former employers at Masaba Farmers Co-operative Union Limited. The Appellants advanced sixteen grounds of appeal, contending principally that the Respondent had retired lawfully upon attaining retirement age (asserting his birth date as 1st January 1963 per NSSF and identity card records), that he had been paid his salary and utilised his leave, and that the awards of Kshs. 1,433,525/- in salary arrears, payment in lieu of leave, an order to remit PAYE and NSSF deductions, and Kshs. 100,000/- in damages were unsupported. The appeal was canvassed by written submissions. Applying the settled duty of a first appellate court to re-evaluate the evidence (Selle v Associated Motor Boat Co; Abdul Hammed Saif v Ali Mohamed Sholan), Nzioki wa Makau, J held that the Appellants' assertion of a 1st January 1963 birth date was unproven, that the employer as keeper of records had admitted haphazard salary payment and failed to produce employment records, and that its failure to prove the Respondent had utilised his leave was fatal. The discretionary damages award was not shown to have been arrived at on wrong principles. The appeal was accordingly dismissed with costs to the Respondent, upholding the Trial Court's judgment in its entirety.

Key legal issues

#
01

Date of birth and retirement age

Holding

The Appellants' assertion that the Respondent was born on 1st January 1963 was unproven; the identity card indicates only 1963, so the Trial Court's finding could not be disturbed

Reasoning

The Appellants asserted a specific birth date without proof. The Respondent's documents only show 1963. The Court held it erroneous to assume 1st January 1963 over December 1963, so the finding of premature retirement stood.

p. 13
02

Salary arrears

Holding

The employer, as keeper of records, admitted haphazard payment; failure to complain previously was immaterial

Reasoning

The employer admitted paying salaries haphazardly and did not produce records. The Court held the Trial Court was entitled to find non-payment, and the Respondent's lack of prior complaint did not cure the employer's non-compliance.

p. 14
03

Leave pay

Holding

The Appellants' failure to prove the Respondent went on leave as alleged was fatal to their assertion that all leave days were spent

Reasoning

As keepers of employment records, the Appellants bore the burden of proving utilisation of leave. Their failure to discharge it meant the award of salary in lieu of leave could not be faulted.

p. 14
04

Damages of Kshs. 100,000/-

Holding

The award was within reason and a discretionary remedy; no misdirection was demonstrated

Reasoning

Applying the principle that an appellate court does not interfere with judicial discretion absent misdirection, the Court found the award reasonable and declined to disturb it.

p. 14

Legal principles established

#
  • The duty of a first appellate court is to reconsider and re-evaluate the evidence and draw its own conclusions without the benefit of seeing witnesses
  • An employer who keeps employment records bears the consequences of failing to produce them; ad hoc salary payment practices cannot support a claim of error by the Trial Court
  • An appellate court will not interfere with a discretionary award absent a misdirection or failure to consider relevant factors

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The appeal is dismissed with costs to the Respondent
  2. 2.The judgment and decree of Hon. Nyariki Joshua (SRM) in Kisii MELRC No. E002 of 2022 delivered on 27th August 2025 is upheld
On appeal from
Kisii Magistrates' Court (MCELRC)
Kisii MCELRC No. E002 of 2022
Jurisdiction invoked
First appellate jurisdiction over the magistrates' court judgment (Employment and Labour Relations Court appeal)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "The Chairman Masaba Farmers Co-operative Union Limited & 2 others v Peter Ombaba Nyaoko", Case Analysis (2026). Appeal No. E001 of 2026. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2026/2650/eng@2026-09-29

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.