Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedConstitutional Petition No E007 of 2024· [2025] KEELRC 3732 (KLR)

Ngei v Teachers Service Commission (Constitutional Petition E007 of 2024) [2025] KEELRC 3732 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
17 December 2025
7,834 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~31 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's employment court ruled that a disabled teacher's forced transfers amounted to constructive dismissal, awarding her Kshs 2 million in damages.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Petitioner, employed by the Teachers Service Commission since 1991 and disabled by a blood disorder arising from the 1998 Co-operative House bomb blast, petitioned the ELRC alleging constructive dismissal and violation of her rights under Articles 41, 47 and 50 of the Constitution after being transferred three times to Makueni County despite her known medical condition. She opted for early retirement on 16th October 2023, later sought reinstatement with the support of the Head of Civil Service, and obtained a finding from the Commission on Administrative Justice that the transfers contravened Article 47 and section 4 of the Fair Administrative Action Act, a finding upheld on appeal. The court, constituted by J.W. Keli, J, framed three issues: constructive dismissal, constitutional violations, and remedies. It held that although transfer is a management prerogative, it must be exercised fairly and humanely; the 2023 transfer to Mukaa, remote from specialty medical care and dangerous for a petitioner dependent on supplemental oxygen, was unfair and inhumane, breached Articles 28, 41 and 47, and drove her early retirement, amounting to constructive dismissal proved on a balance of probability. The court respected the conclusive CAJ decision. Remedies were partially granted: declarations of constructive dismissal and unconstitutional transfer, general damages of Kshs 2 million (approximately twelve months' gross salary) with interest, and costs. Claims for compensation up to age 65 under the Persons with Disabilities Act, damages for torture, exemplary and aggravated damages and medical expenses were refused, the latter for want of pleading.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the Respondent's repeated transfers amounted to constructive dismissal

Holding

Yes - the repeated transfers to Makueni despite known ill health amounted to constructive dismissal

Reasoning

The court applied the Coca Cola v Ligaga principles. The respondent knew of the petitioner's acute health condition arising from the 1998 bomb blast, yet transferred her three times to a hilly terrain far from specialty medical care, causing her to take early retirement. The failure to appeal the transfer was immaterial given prior returns from the same station and the CAJ's conclusive finding. Constructive dismissal was proved on a balance of probability.

p. 10
02

Whether the transfer violated the Petitioner's constitutional rights

Holding

Yes - violation of Articles 28, 41 and 47

Reasoning

The conditions at Mukaa, a remote station far from Makueni Level 5 hospital, threatened the life of a petitioner dependent on supplemental oxygen. The transfer was made with knowledge of her frail health and certified disability, without fair and humane consideration and without written reasons, breaching fair labour practices and fair administrative action.

p. 11
03

Remedies available

Holding

General damages of Kshs 2 million (approximately 12 months' gross salary) with interest and costs; statutory compensation under the Persons with Disabilities Act refused

Reasoning

Relying on section 12 of the ELRC Act, the court awarded general damages for the constitutional violations leading to constructive dismissal. It found no statutory basis for compensation for the extended retirement age and declined aggravated, exemplary and torture damages for want of pleading, treating the general damages as adequate.

p. 13

Legal principles established

#
  • While transfer of an employee is a management prerogative, it must be exercised fairly and humanely, particularly where the employer knows of the employee's medical condition
  • A finding by the Commission on Administrative Justice, conclusive on appeal, must be respected by the court under Article 159(2)
  • Constructive dismissal requires the employer's conduct to be the effective cause of the employee's exit, proved on a balance of probability

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Declaration that the voluntary retirement amounted to constructive dismissal
  2. 2.Declaration that the transfer to Makueni, Mukaa was an unfair labour practice and unfair administrative action in violation of articles 28, 41 and 47 of the Constitution
  3. 3.General damages of Kshs. 2,000,000 for the constructive dismissal and violation of articles 41 and 47, with interest at court rate from the judgment date
  4. 4.Costs of the petition to the Petitioner

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of KenyaArticles 27, 28, 41, 47, 50, 159(2), 237, 252(1)(d), 23(3)
  • Employment ActSection 49(1)(c)
  • Fair Administrative Action ActSection 4
  • Commission on Administrative Justice ActSection 8(b)
  • Persons with Disabilities ActSection 15(6) / Section 21(6)
  • Teachers Service Commission ActSections 47 and general mandate
  • Teachers Service Commission Code of RegulationsRegulations 67 and 68
  • ELRC ActSection 12
  • Human Resource Policies and Procedures Manual for Secretariat Staff2018

Cases cited (10)

  • Coca Cola East & Central Africa Limited v Maria Kagai Ligaga
    [2015] eKLR
  • Edwin Beiti Kipchumba v National Bank of Kenya Limited
    [2018] KEELRC 2393 (KLR)
  • Kenya Union of Domestic Workers, Hotels, Education Institutions, Hotels and Allied Workers (Kudheidha) v United Kenya Club
    [2024] KEELRC 761 (KLR)
  • Lewis Moses Odhiambo & another v Mahanaim International High School & another
    [2021] eKLR
  • Geoffrey Oduor Sijeny v Kenyatta University
    [2018] eKLR
  • Kenya Union of Sugarcane Plantation and Allied Workers v Othira
    (Appeal E005 of 2023) [2024] KEELRC 843 (KLR)
  • Otieno v Mutsimoto Motor Company Limited
    (Petition E003 of 2022) [2024] KEELRC 1663 (KLR)
  • Regeru v Nation Media Group Limited
    (Civil Case 433 of 2006) [2022] KEHC 13528 (KLR)
  • Kenyatta National Hospital v Dorcas Odongo & another
    [2021] eKLR
  • Macharia v Safaricom PLC
    (Petition 434 of 2019) [2021] KEHC 462 (KLR)
Jurisdiction invoked
Articles 41, 47 and 23 of the Constitution; Section 12 of the ELRC Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Ngei v Teachers Service Commission (Constitutional Petition E007 of 2024) [2025] KEELRC 3732 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). Constitutional Petition No E007 of 2024. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2025/3732/eng@2025-12-17

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.