Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCDismissedMotion dated 3 March 2025 (suit number not stated in judgment)· [2025] KEELRC 2658 (KLR)

Kenya Chemical Workers' Union v Alliance Concrete Ltd (Cause E195 of 2025) [2025] KEELRC 2658 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
2 October 2025
598 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~2 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Employment Court ruled that dismissed employees cannot be reinstated before a full hearing — reinstatement is a final remedy reserved for exceptional cases.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Kenya Chemical Workers Union, acting for two dismissed truck drivers (Willy Murithi Watiri and Michael Kipyegon Terer, the Grievants), moved the Employment and Labour Relations Court by Motion dated 3 March 2025 against Alliance Concrete Ltd. The Union sought interlocutory reinstatement of the Grievants to their previous positions on the same terms prevailing before their dismissals on 26 October 2024 and 12 November 2024, and an injunction restraining the Respondent from harassing, intimidating or coercing the Grievants in connection with the litigation. The Union argued the dismissals violated procedural fairness and the right to fair labour practices. The Respondent, through a replying and supplementary affidavit of its Human Resource Manager and submissions, contended the Motion was incompetent, the dismissals followed a fair process for valid reasons, and the dispute had gone through conciliation. The Court (Radido Stephen, J) held that reinstatement under section 49(3) of the Employment Act, 2007 is a final remedy grantable after a hearing on the merits; at the interlocutory stage the order sought would amount to specific performance, grantable only in exceptional circumstances. The Court further held that because the Grievants were no longer in an employment relationship, harassment within the employment context did not arise. Finding no exceptional circumstances demonstrated, the Court dismissed the Motion with costs in the cause on 2 October 2025.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether reinstatement can be granted at the interlocutory stage

Holding

No. It is a final remedy under section 49(3) reserved for after a hearing on the merits, and at the interlocutory stage it would constitute specific performance requiring exceptional circumstances.

Reasoning

The Court reasoned that since the Grievants had already been dismissed, ordering reinstatement before trial would effectively grant final relief prematurely. The statutory reinstatement power in section 49(3) is exercised on the merits after a full hearing. Granting it pendente lite equates to specific performance of an employment contract, which Kenyan law permits only in exceptional circumstances, none demonstrated here.

p. 2
02

Whether an anti-harassment injunction could issue against the Respondent

Holding

No, because the Grievants are no longer in an employment relationship with the Respondent, so harassment within that context does not arise.

Reasoning

The Court found the injunction premise defective: the employment relationship had ended upon dismissal. Harassment 'within the context of employment' could therefore not be established at the interlocutory stage, and the Union did not demonstrate the exceptional circumstances necessary to warrant the interlocutory orders sought.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • Reinstatement under section 49(3) of the Employment Act, 2007 is a final remedy to be granted after a hearing on the merits, not at the interlocutory stage
  • Interlocutory reinstatement of a dismissed employee amounts to an order of specific performance, grantable only in exceptional circumstances

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Motion dated 3 March 2025 is dismissed with costs in the cause
Jurisdiction invoked
Employment and Labour Relations Court jurisdiction under the Employment Act, 2007 (section 49(3) invoked on reinstatement)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kenya Chemical Workers' Union v Alliance Concrete Ltd (Cause E195 of 2025) [2025] KEELRC 2658 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). Motion dated 3 March 2025 (suit number not stated in judgment). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2025/2658/eng@2025-10-02

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.