Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCDismissedNotice of Motion dated 14th April 2025 (ELRC)· [2025] KEELRC 2502 (KLR)

Matete v Technical University of Kenya; Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission (Interested Party) (Cause E901 of 2024) [2025] KEELRC 2502 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
19 September 2025
2,127 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~9 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Employment Court ruled that pending employment proceedings cannot stop EACC from investigating the same employee's conduct.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a ruling on the Claimant's Notice of Motion dated 14th April 2025 in an employment dispute. The Claimant, an Assistant Lecturer at the Respondent university facing a Notice to Show Cause for allegedly working for two public institutions, sought to enjoin the Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission as an interested party and to restrain its officers (T. Loomu and A. Hussein) from interviewing him or recording a statement regarding alleged double employment, arguing the investigation was premature and prejudicial to proceedings pending before the court and offended his fair-hearing rights under Article 50(1). Neither the Respondent nor the proposed Interested Party responded. The court, Stella Rutto J, framed two issues: the interlocutory injunction threshold and joinder of the interested party. Applying Giella v Cassman Brown and Mrao Ltd, the court held that the employment proceedings and the EACC's constitutionally mandated investigations are distinct processes arising from the same facts; the Claimant did not show how the investigations would interfere with or compromise the proceedings, disclosed no right threatened with violation, and demonstrated no irreparable damage. On joinder, applying the Communications Commission of Kenya test, the EACC has no identifiable stake in the proceedings. The application was dismissed with costs in the cause.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether an interlocutory injunction could issue to restrain EACC investigations

Holding

No - the Claimant disclosed no right threatened with violation and no irreparable damage

Reasoning

The claim is a pure employment dispute over the disciplinary process, while the EACC is exercising its constitutional and statutory mandate to investigate ethical violations by public officers. The two processes are distinct. The Claimant did not show how the investigations would interfere with the proceedings or compromise their integrity, and there has been no EACC determination amounting to interference.

p. 4
02

Whether the EACC should be joined as an interested party

Holding

No - the EACC has no identifiable stake in the employment proceedings

Reasoning

An interested party must have an identifiable stake or legal interest in the proceedings. Since the EACC's summons were issued in exercise of its own investigative mandate and the processes are distinct, the Claimant failed to demonstrate that the EACC would be affected by the Court's decision in the employment claim.

p. 5

Legal principles established

#
  • The three-part Giella test for interlocutory injunctions must be satisfied sequentially
  • EACC investigations under its constitutional and statutory mandate and pending employment proceedings arising from the same facts are distinct processes

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The orders sought in the Notice of Motion dated 14th April 2025 are declined
  2. 2.The Application is dismissed with costs in the cause
Jurisdiction invoked
Jurisdiction of the ELRC over employment disputes; interlocutory application under Order 1 Rule 10(2) of the Civil Procedure Rules and Rule 7 of the Constitution of Kenya (Protection of Rights & Fundamental Freedoms) Practice & Procedure Rules 2013

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Matete v Technical University of Kenya; Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission (Interested Party) (Cause E901 of 2024) [2025] KEELRC 2502 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). Notice of Motion dated 14th April 2025 (ELRC). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2025/2502/eng@2025-09-19

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.