Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedNot stated in the judgment as provided· [2025] KEELRC 2427 (KLR)

Simon v Board of Management St Agnes Gaukene Girls Secondary School (Employment and Labour Relations Appeal E006 of 2023) [2025] KEELRC 2427 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
12 September 2025
2,261 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~9 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's ELRC ruled a Covid-era school suspension wasn't unfair dismissal, but the employee still recovered unpaid salary and service pay.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The appellant, formerly an Accounts Clerk employed by the respondent school from 3rd October 2003, was suspended on half salary on 9th April 2020 pending disciplinary proceedings that were stalled by the Covid-19 pandemic. The respondent later suspended the half salary from 1st June 2020 citing financial constraints, despite a directive from the County Director of Education reversing the suspension. The appellant sued in the lower court; the trial magistrate (Hon. Mwangi - SPM) found no dismissal but desertion, dismissed the claim yet awarded service pay of Kshs.476,425. On first appeal, the ELRC at Nyeri (Onesmus N Makau, J) re-evaluated the evidence and held that the appellant's absence from duty was attributable to the suspension, not desertion, and that the suspension and the stoppage of half pay did not amount to constructive or unfair dismissal given the pandemic-related closure of schools and one month's notice. However, by filing suit claiming terminal dues without prior notice, the appellant voluntarily terminated her contract, defeating the claim for unlawful termination and compensatory damages. The court allowed the appeal only in part, awarding salary arrears of Kshs.145,730 for April to October 2020, leaving the unchallenged service pay award of Kshs.476,425 intact, and awarded the appellant costs of both the appeal and the lower court plus interest at court rates from the date of the court judgment.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the appellant's absence from duty amounted to desertion or the suspension amounted to unlawful/constructive dismissal

Holding

Neither: the appellant was on lawful suspension, and the non-payment of half salary was justified by Covid-19 closures; she neither deserted nor was dismissed.

Reasoning

The reason for absence was the suspension letter dated 9th April 2020. The County Director of Education's reversal directive was not complied with, but the trial court's conclusion of desertion was also wrong. Schools were closed by Government directive, making the disciplinary process impossible and justifying suspension of salary, with one month's notice of the half-salary suspension given. Judicial notice was taken of the Covid-19 closure of learning institutions.

p. 4
02

Whether the appellant was entitled to salary arrears and other reliefs

Holding

She was entitled to full salary from 1st June 2020 to 6th October 2020 and the withheld half salary for April and May 2020, totalling Kshs.145,730; the unchallenged service pay award of Kshs.476,425 was left undisturbed.

Reasoning

Having found no dismissal, the court held the appellant voluntarily terminated her contract by filing suit claiming terminal dues without prior notice, so no compensation for unlawful termination was due. However, she remained entitled to unpaid salary for the period of suspension until she terminated the contract. The service pay award stood as the respondent filed no cross-appeal.

p. 5

Legal principles established

#
  • On a first appeal the court must re-evaluate the evidence on record and draw its own conclusions, while making due allowance for not having seen or heard the witnesses.
  • An employee who files suit claiming terminal dues without prior notice voluntarily brings her employment contract to an end, barring a claim for unlawful termination.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The appellant is awarded salary arrears for April-October 2020 equalling to Kshs.145,730.
  2. 2.The award of service pay of Kshs.476,425 by the trial court is not disturbed.
  3. 3.The appellant is awarded costs of the appeal and the court below plus interest at court rate from the date of the court judgment.
On appeal from
Magistrates' Court (trial court, Hon. Mwangi - SPM)
Not stated
Jurisdiction invoked
First appeal to the Employment and Labour Relations Court from the lower court (the court exercised its first-appeal mandate to re-evaluate evidence)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Simon v Board of Management St Agnes Gaukene Girls Secondary School (Employment and Labour Relations Appeal E006 of 2023) [2025] KEELRC 2427 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). Not stated in the judgment as provided. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2025/2427/eng@2025-09-12

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.