Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCAllowedNotice of Motion application dated 30th January 2025· [2025] KEELRC 2407 (KLR)

Nyamwaya (Suing on Her own Behalf and On behalf of the Estate of the Late Samuel Onyancha Kinanga (Deceased)) v Dock Workers Union (Miscellaneous Application 16 of 2024) [2025] KEELRC 2407 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
17 July 2025
2,998 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~12 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Employment Court confirmed it can enforce workplace injury awards from the Director of Occupational Safety, awarding a widow Kshs. 16.4 million against Dock Workers Union.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Applicant, widow and legal representative of Samuel Onyancha Kinaga, a chief accountant who died from gunshot injuries sustained on 29th January 2020 in the course of employment with the Respondent, sought adoption as a judgment of the Court of an award by the Director of Occupational Safety and Health Services made on 11th March 2022 for Kshs. 16,482,336 based on 100% permanent incapacity, plus interest. The Respondent opposed, arguing it was a trade union not properly sued, that the deceased was not shot at its workplace, that it was a stranger to the Director's proceedings, that the Director exceeded his mandate and miscalculated the salary, and that the Court lacked jurisdiction since Sections 87 and 90 of the Employment Act and Rule 17 of the 2016 Rules were inapplicable and no substantive cause existed. The Respondent also relied on the prior ruling in Miscellaneous Application No. E 031 of 2023, which struck out an earlier application as premature and referred the parties back to the Director. The Court framed three issues: jurisdiction, the impact of the prior ruling, and entitlement to the orders sought. Relying on Rule 69 of the ELRC (Procedure) Rules, 2024 and the Court of Appeal's decision in Charles v Cheto, the Court held it has jurisdiction to adopt the Director's award despite the absence of an enforcement mechanism in WIBA, that grievances about the Director's process lie in judicial review rather than in an adoption application, and that the prior ruling did not set aside the award. The Court adopted the award and entered judgment for the Applicant for Kshs. 16,482,336 plus interest at Court rate, with costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Jurisdiction of the ELRC to enforce the Director's WIBA awards

Holding

The Court has jurisdiction to adopt and enforce the Director's award notwithstanding the absence of an enforcement mechanism in WIBA.

Reasoning

Two schools of thought existed on whether the ELRC has original or only appellate jurisdiction over the Director's decisions. The Court adopted the view that the jurisdictional gap cannot leave successful parties without a remedy, as that would defeat access to justice. Section 12 of the Employment and Labour Relations Act grants broad jurisdiction, and Rule 69 of the 2024 Procedure Rules now expressly provides for adoption of awards and decisions from Alternative Justice Systems. The Court of Appeal in Charles v Cheto affirmed this position.

p. 6
02

Effect of the earlier ruling in Miscellaneous Application No. E 031 of 2023

Holding

The earlier ruling striking out the prior application as premature has no adverse effect on the current application.

Reasoning

The Court found the earlier application was struck out because the certificate of dependency had not been obtained, rendering it premature. The Court had referred the parties back to the Director to comply with sections 6 and 34 of WIBA, but it did not set aside the Director's decision or order fresh inquiries. Once the certificate of dependency was secured, filing a fresh application was the correct course rather than reviving the struck-out application.

p. 6
03

Respondent's objections on liability and non-participation before the Director

Holding

Liability and procedural complaints about the Director's process cannot be litigated in an adoption application.

Reasoning

The Respondent alleged it was a stranger to the Director's proceedings, that the Director exceeded his mandate, and ignored the earlier ruling. The Court held these matters fall outside an adoption application; the Respondent's remedy, if any, is a judicial review application. The Respondent also never appealed the Director's award within the prescribed 90 days, leaving the award intact and enforceable.

p. 6

Legal principles established

#
  • The ELRC has jurisdiction to adopt and enforce the Director of Occupational Safety and Health Services' awards under WIBA, the Work Injury Benefits Act lacking an enforcement mechanism.
  • A decision or award arising from proceedings before the Director stems from an Alternative Justice System and may be adopted as an order of the Court under Rule 69 of the ELRC Procedure Rules, 2024.
  • Grievances against the Director's conduct in assessing compensation must be pursued by judicial review, not by resisting an adoption application.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Director of Occupational Safety and Health Services' award made on 11.03.2022 is adopted as the judgment of the Court
  2. 2.Judgment is entered for the Applicant against the Respondent for Kshs. 16,482,336.00 plus interest at Court rate
  3. 3.Costs of the application granted to the Applicant
Jurisdiction invoked
Articles 47, 48 and 50(1) of the Constitution; Section 12 of the Employment and Labour Relations Act; Sections 87 and 90 of the Employment Act; Rule 69 of the Employment and Labour Relations Court (Procedure) Rules, 2024; Article 162(2)(a) of the Constitution

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Nyamwaya (Suing on Her own Behalf and On behalf of the Estate of the Late Samuel Onyancha Kinanga (Deceased)) v Dock Workers Union (Miscellaneous Application 16 of 2024) [2025] KEELRC 2407 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). Notice of Motion application dated 30th January 2025. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2025/2407/eng@2025-07-17

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.