Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedMombasa CMELRC No. E268 of 2023 (Appeal)· [2025] KEELRC 2323 (KLR)

Amwanga v Senaca East Africa Limited (Appeal E047 of 2025) [2025] KEELRC 2323 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
31 July 2025
1,791 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~7 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Employment Court cut a security guard's arrears to just 12 months of underpayment and overtime, confirming periodic wage claims expire quickly.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a first appeal to the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Mombasa against the judgment of 13 March 2025 in Mombasa CMELRC No. E268 of 2023, which had awarded the appellant underpayments of Ksh. 33,564.45 and pro-rated leave, and awarded the respondent notice pay of Ksh. 9,500 on its counterclaim. The appellant, employed from 28 April 2019 until resignation effective 31 January 2023 at a wage of Ksh. 13,000 monthly, sought enhanced underpayment, overtime and leave awards. The court, on reassessment of the record, held that the written contract placed the appellant on day duties (6 am to 6 pm), six days a week, totalling 72 hours against the 60-hour weekly maximum under the Regulation of Wages (Protective Security Services) Order, thus attracting overtime for the 12 excess hours. Applying section 90 of the Employment Act and Court of Appeal authority, it held that underpayments, housing allowances and overtime are continuing injuries accruing periodically and recoverable only within 12 months, restricting claims to January 2022 onwards. It recalculated underpayment at Ksh. 53,144.70 and overtime at Ksh. 76,944, to be offset against the counterclaim for notice pay recalculated on the gross wage of Ksh. 17,481.90 and payments already made of Ksh. 69,443.12. Finding the trial court's costs award unsupported by reasons as required by section 12(3) of the ELRC Act, the court directed each party to bear its own costs for the appeal and trial.

Key legal issues

#
01

Status of the appellant as day or night guard

Holding

The written contract dated 28 April 2019 provided for working hours of 6 am to 6 pm, making the position that of a day guard

Reasoning

Section 10(3) of the Employment Act requires a written contract. The contract issued to the appellant specified clause (6) working hours of 6 am to 6 pm, so the court accepted the respondent's account that he was a day guard, and assessed dues on that basis.

p. 3
02

Limitation under section 90 of the Employment Act

Holding

Underpayments and overtime are continuing injuries accruing daily, weekly or monthly and are claimable only within 12 months of accrual; claims older than that are time-barred

Reasoning

Relying on the Court of Appeal decisions in Rift Valley Railways and German School Society, the court held that housing allowances, overtime and work-hour benefits accrue periodically and fall within the 12-month continuing injury window under section 90, limiting recoverable arrears to the 12 months before termination on 31 January 2023.

p. 4
03

Overtime entitlement

Holding

Working 12 hours a day for 6 days (72 hours weekly) exceeded the 60-hour maximum, entitling the appellant to overtime for the 12 excess hours, limited to the 12-month limitation window, less amounts already paid

Reasoning

The court calculated the hourly rate from the applicable minimum wage plus 15% house allowance for each period (January–April 2022 and May 2022–January 2023), multiplied by 12 excess hours, 4 weeks and the respective months, totalling Ksh. 76,944.

p. 4
04

Costs and interests under section 12(3) of the ELRC Act

Holding

Discretionary costs awards must be supported by reasons; none were given, so each party was to bear its own costs

Reasoning

The court found the trial court's costs award unsupported by reasons as required by section 12(3) of the Employment and Labour Relations Court Act, and considering the claims and the justified counterclaim, directed each party to bear its own costs for both appeal and trial.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • A wage or benefit that is due daily, weekly or monthly is a continuing injury under section 90 of the Employment Act and must be claimed within 12 months
  • Under the Regulation of Wages (Protective Security Services) Order, a security guard is permitted a maximum of 60 hours per week; hours worked beyond that attract overtime
  • Notice pay on termination must be computed on the last gross wage, not the basic wage

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Underpayment awarded at Ksh. 53,144.70
  2. 2.Overtime awarded at Ksh. 76,944
  3. 3.Counterclaim allowed at Ksh. 17,481.90
  4. 4.Dues under (a) and (b) to be paid less what is due under (c) and what is already paid at Ksh. 69,443.12
  5. 5.Each party to bear its costs for the appeal and trial court proceedings
On appeal from
Magistrate's Court (ELRC), Mombasa
Mombasa CMELRC No. E268 of 2023
Jurisdiction invoked
First appeal under the Employment and Labour Relations Court Act (trial court's judgment in CMELRC No. E268 of 2023)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Amwanga v Senaca East Africa Limited (Appeal E047 of 2025) [2025] KEELRC 2323 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). Mombasa CMELRC No. E268 of 2023 (Appeal). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2025/2323/eng@2025-07-31

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.