Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedCause No E558 of 2024· [2025] KEELRC 2319 (KLR)

Kabiro v Kartasi Products Limited (Cause E558 of 2024) [2025] KEELRC 2319 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
31 July 2025
6,354 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~25 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court ruled that a smoke-free office is a legal duty, and ignoring complaints about a manager smoking amounted to constructive dismissal.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Claimant, employed as Finance Manager from 1st February 2024, resigned with immediate effect on 1st July 2024 after about five months, alleging unfair labour practices, demeaning conduct by the Managing Director, excessive hours, forced work during leave and public holidays, restricted movement during lunch breaks, and exposure to second-hand smoke. She claimed twelve months' salary as constructive termination, general damages, accrued leave, a Certificate of Service, costs and interest. The Respondent denied constructive dismissal, asserting she resigned voluntarily, never invoked formal grievance procedures, and counterclaimed for recruitment costs of Kshs 750,000 and 1.25 days' salary in lieu of unserved notice. In evidence, the Claimant produced a WhatsApp message complaining of the Managing Director smoking during work, to which the HR Manager casually replied 'pole'. The Court framed three issues: constructive dismissal, the counterclaim, and reliefs. It found the smoking complaint genuine, held that employers owe statutory duties under the Occupational Safety and Health Act and the Tobacco Control Act to ensure a smoke-free, safe and healthy workplace irrespective of formal grievances, and, applying the South African precedent Naude v Stealth Marine, found the Claimant was constructively dismissed and entitled to resign with or without notice. The counterclaim was disallowed. The Court awarded compensatory damages of four months' gross salary (Kshs 3,000,000) with interest, declined the accrued leave claim as forfeited in the resignation letter, disallowed general damages, ordered a Certificate of Service within 30 days, and awarded the Claimant costs of both the Claim and Counterclaim.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the Claimant was constructively dismissed

Holding

Yes - the Respondent's failure to ensure a smoke-free, safe and healthy working environment made continued employment intolerable, entitling the Claimant to resign with immediate effect

Reasoning

The Court found the Claimant's complaint about the Managing Director smoking in the workplace credible, drawing an adverse inference from the HR Manager's casual response to her WhatsApp message. Section 6(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act, sections 32, 33 and 35 of the Tobacco Control Act and the ILO 1998 Declaration (as amended in 2022) imposed duties on the employer. Following the South African case of Naude v Stealth Marine, the breach of these duties rendered employment intolerable. The absence of a formal grievance did not excuse the employer given the statutory duty.

p. 12
02

Whether the Counterclaim for recruitment costs and salary in lieu of notice has merit

Holding

No - the counterclaim is disallowed because the Claimant was entitled to leave on the basis of an intolerable working environment

Reasoning

Having found constructive dismissal, the Court held the Claimant was entitled to leave the employment with or without notice. Consequently the claims for refund of Kshs 750,000 in recruitment costs and 1.25 days' salary in lieu of unserved notice could not stand.

p. 12
03

What reliefs the Claimant is entitled to

Holding

Compensatory damages of four months' gross salary (Kshs 3,000,000) with interest, and a Certificate of Service; accrued leave, general damages and the counterclaim were declined

Reasoning

The Court awarded the equivalent of four months' salary taking into account the short length of employment (about 5 months) and the circumstances of termination. The leave claim failed because the Claimant willfully forfeited the accrued days in her resignation letter; the general damages claims were disallowed; a Certificate of Service was granted as the employment relationship was admitted.

p. 12

Legal principles established

#
  • An employer's statutory duty to provide a safe and healthy, smoke-free working environment does not depend on a formal grievance being lodged; notification of a statutory violation obliges the employer to investigate and take remedial action.
  • Failure to ensure a smoke-free, safe and healthy working environment can render continued employment intolerable and amount to constructive dismissal, entitling the employee to resign with or without notice.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The claim for constructive dismissal succeeds and the Claimant is awarded the sum of Kshs 3,000,000.00 being compensatory damages equivalent to four (4) months of her gross salary
  2. 2.Interest on the amount at Court rates from the date of Judgment until payment in full
  3. 3.The Counterclaim is disallowed
  4. 4.The Respondent shall bear the costs of the Claim and Counterclaim
  5. 5.The Respondent shall issue the Claimant with a Certificate of Service, within 30 days from the date of this judgment

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Tobacco Control ActSection 32
  • Tobacco Control ActSection 33(1) and (2)
  • Tobacco Control ActSection 35
  • Occupational Safety and Health ActSection 6(1)
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 159(2)(d)
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 48
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 21 Rule 1
  • Civil Procedure ActSection 1B

Cases cited (6)

  • Kenya Akiba Micro Financing Limited vs. Ezekiel Chebii & 14 others
    [2012] eKLR
  • Nzilu v Inter-Religious Council of Kenya & another
    [2025] KEELRC 931 (KLR)
  • Coca-Cola East & Central Africa Limited vs Maria Kagai Ligaga
    [2015] eKLR
  • Bosch v JDG Group (Pty) Ltd and Others
    (JR578/14) (2021) ZALCJHB 171
  • Feroz Ali Omar v ECU Worldwide Limited
    [2018] eKLR
  • Naude v Stealth Marine
    (2004) 25 ILJ 2402 (BCA)
Jurisdiction invoked
Original employment and labour relations jurisdiction of the Employment and Labour Relations Court

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kabiro v Kartasi Products Limited (Cause E558 of 2024) [2025] KEELRC 2319 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). Cause No E558 of 2024. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2025/2319/eng@2025-07-31

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.