Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedNot stated in the ruling· [2025] KEELRC 1878 (KLR)

Desmond Leteipa Silei t/a Leteipa Silei Law Advocates v Bomet County Public Service Board (Miscellaneous Application E001 of 2024) [2025] KEELRC 1878 (KLR)

High Court of Kenya (Employment and Labour Relations Court work handled in ruling at Kericho)
27 June 2025
706 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~3 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court turned a lawyer's Kshs. 6.6 million taxed fees bill into an enforceable judgment, with 14% annual interest, but let the client appeal only if it first deposits the full amount in court.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This ruling by James Rika, Judge, at Kericho, determined two consolidated applications arising from an advocate-client costs dispute. The Advocate, Desmond Leteipa Silei, applied by notice dated 3rd December 2024 for adoption of the certificate of costs dated 23rd May 2024 for Kshs. 6,631,429.98 as a judgment of the Court, entry of judgment for that sum, and interest at 14% per annum from 24th May 2024 under Rule 7 of the Advocates Remuneration Order. The Client/Respondent, through its Acting CEO Emmy Chesang, applied on 9th January 2025 for stay of proceedings and leave to appeal against the Court's ruling of 26th November 2024, which had declined its attempt to object to the Bill of Costs. The applications were consolidated on 29th April 2025. The Court held it had to balance the Advocate's right to his taxed costs against the Respondent's right of access to the Court of Appeal. Noting that the Bill was taxed over a year earlier, that the Respondent did not participate in taxation, that its objection application was declined, and that its Court of Appeal application for leave was withdrawn by consent, the Court adopted the certificate of costs as judgment and awarded interest at 14% per annum effective 29th May 2024. However, the Respondent was granted conditional stay of execution and leave to appeal, conditioned on deposit of the whole decretal sum in Court within 30 days, with 30 days thereafter to file the appeal; on default, the stay orders lapse and the Advocate may execute. There was no order on the costs of the applications.

Key legal issues

#
01

Adoption of the certificate of taxed costs as judgment

Holding

The certificate of costs dated 23rd May 2024 for Kshs. 6,631,429.98 was adopted as a judgment of the Court.

Reasoning

The Bill of Costs had been taxed over a year earlier, on 23rd May 2024. The Respondent did not participate in taxation, its application for leave to object dated 8th July 2024 was declined by ruling dated 26th November 2024, and its intended appeal at the Court of Appeal Nakuru had been withdrawn with the consent of the parties. In the interest of justice, the taxed certificate was adopted as judgment.

p. 2
02

Interest on taxed costs under Rule 7 of the Advocates Remuneration Order

Holding

Interest at 14% per annum effective 29th May 2024 was awarded on the decretal sum.

Reasoning

Rule 7 of the Advocates Remuneration Order entitles an advocate to interest on taxed costs from the expiry of 30 days after service of the Bill of Costs. The Bill was taxed on 23rd May 2024 and the Court allowed interest effective 29th May 2024, aligning with the Advocate's prayer for interest from the 30th day after service.

p. 2
03

Balancing the Advocate's right to costs against the Respondent's right of appeal

Holding

Stay of execution and leave to appeal were granted conditionally, on deposit of the whole decretal sum in Court within 30 days.

Reasoning

The Court held it must strike a delicate balance between the Advocate's right to his taxed costs and the Respondent's right of access to the appellate jurisdiction. It secured the Advocate's position by requiring deposit of the full decretal sum before stay and leave to appeal would take effect, with automatic lapse on default.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • A certificate of taxed advocate-client costs may be adopted as a judgment of the Court, with interest under Rule 7 of the Advocates Remuneration Order, while a respondent's right to appeal may be accommodated through conditional stay secured by deposit of the decretal sum.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The certificate of costs dated 23rd May 2024 for Kshs. 6,631,429.98, issued pursuant to taxation of the Advocate-Client Bill of Costs dated 24th April 2024, is adopted as a Judgment of the Court
  2. 2.Interest on the decretal sum at the rate of 14% per annum, effective 29th May 2024, is allowed in accordance with Rule 7 of the Advocates Remuneration Order
  3. 3.Orders of stay of execution of the decree and leave to appeal against the ruling dated 26th November 2024 are granted to the Respondent on condition that the whole decretal sum of Kshs. 6,631,429.98 is deposited in Court within 30 days of the ruling
  4. 4.Upon deposit of security, the Respondent shall have leave of 30 days from the date deposit is made to file its appeal against the ruling dated 26th November 2024
  5. 5.In default of any condition, all orders under paragraph (c) shall automatically lapse and the Advocate is placed at liberty to execute
  6. 6.No order on the costs of the two applications
Jurisdiction invoked
Inherent jurisdiction of the Court and Rule 7 of the Advocates Remuneration Order

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Desmond Leteipa Silei t/a Leteipa Silei Law Advocates v Bomet County Public Service Board (Miscellaneous Application E001 of 2024) [2025] KEELRC 1878 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). Not stated in the ruling. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2025/1878/eng@2025-06-27

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.