Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCAllowedCause (not stated in extract; Motion dated 17 February 2025)· [2025] KEELRC 1491 (KLR)

Kenya Electrical Traders and Allied Workers Union v Kenya Electricity Transmission Limited (Cause E1060 of 2023) [2025] KEELRC 1491 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
22 May 2025
1,319 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~5 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court ruled that employers cannot refuse to hand employment records to a conciliator or walk away from conciliation they asked for.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Union moved the Court by a Motion dated 17 February 2025 seeking mandamus to compel Kenya Electricity Transmission Co Ltd to provide a Conciliator with documents he had requested in correspondences of 1 October 2024 and 20 November 2024 and a Progress Report of 2 October 2024, and directions that the census ordered on 22 May 2024 be conducted by secret balloting in all of the Respondent's stations. The referral to conciliation and census had been made by the Court on 22 May 2024 at the Respondent's own request when the cause came up for hearing. The Respondent opposed the Motion through a replying affidavit and Grounds of Opposition, asserting it had already supplied the records, that the Conciliator exceeded his mandate and showed bias, and that the Union sought to introduce new evidence; it also withdrew from the conciliation. On the information given from the bar, the Court directed the Respondent to file an affidavit exhibiting the documents, which it substantially did. The Court held that the requested records are those an employer must keep under sections 10, 13, 20 and 74 of the Employment Act, 2007, that the Conciliator as a Labour Officer is an authorised officer entitled to their production under section 74(2), and that section 67(5) of the Labour Relations Act imposed the obligation independently. Having itself proposed conciliation, the Respondent could not in bad faith refuse cooperation or withdraw. Allowing the Motion, the Court ordered production of the documents by 30 May 2025, failing which the Conciliator may rely on the records filed in Court, ordered the census by secret ballot in all stations within 90 days, and awarded the Union costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the Respondent was statutorily obliged to furnish the Conciliator with employment records

Holding

Yes. The records requested are kept in the ordinary course of business under sections 10, 13, 20 and 74 of the Employment Act, 2007, and the Conciliator, as a Labour Officer, is an authorised officer entitled to their production; alternatively section 67(5) of the Labour Relations Act imposed the same obligation.

Reasoning

The Court found the requested documents (payrolls, staff lists, withdrawal lists, verification minutes) are records employers must keep under the Employment Act. Under section 74(2) such records must be produced for inspection by an authorised officer, and a Conciliator qualifies as a Labour Officer. Even if he did not, section 67(5) of the Labour Relations Act independently obliged the Respondent to provide them. The Respondent's refusal therefore lacked legal basis and mandamus was warranted.

p. 3
02

Whether the Respondent could withdraw from the court-ordered conciliation

Holding

No. Having itself proposed conciliation, the Respondent could not in bad faith fail to cooperate or withdraw.

Reasoning

The dispute was referred to conciliation on the Court's direction, and it was the Respondent that requested that mode of resolution. Industrial relations depends on good faith between employers and trade unions; withdrawal and non-cooperation were therefore unconscionable and in bad faith.

p. 3
03

Whether the census should be conducted by secret balloting in all stations

Holding

Yes. To establish the level of union representation in light of membership withdrawals, the census was ordered by secret ballot in all stations within 90 days.

Reasoning

The Court held a prompt census would be of mutual benefit given the withdrawals, and that the Respondent should not fear the Union's entry into the workplace since unions have a constitutional right to organise and employees a right to associate with a trade union of their choice.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • A party that proposed or acquiesced in referral to conciliation cannot in bad faith fail to cooperate with the Conciliator or withdraw from the conciliation.
  • An employer is under a statutory duty to produce employment records, and a Conciliator (being a Labour Officer) is an authorised officer entitled to inspect them.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.An order directing the Respondent to provide the Conciliator with the documents enumerated in the Conciliator's correspondences dated 1 October 2024 and 20 November 2024, as well as the Progress Report dated 2 October 2024 and placed before the Court, on or before 30 May 2025
  2. 2.In default, the Conciliator is free to rely on the records placed before the Court
  3. 3.An order that the census ordered on 22 May 2024 be conducted by way of secret balloting in all of the Respondent's stations within the next 90 days to establish the level of union representation and membership
  4. 4.Costs of the Motion to the Union
Jurisdiction invoked
Inherent powers of the Employment and Labour Relations Court over the cause, including the court-ordered conciliation and census

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kenya Electrical Traders and Allied Workers Union v Kenya Electricity Transmission Limited (Cause E1060 of 2023) [2025] KEELRC 1491 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). Cause (not stated in extract; Motion dated 17 February 2025). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2025/1491/eng@2025-05-22

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.