Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedCause No E1071 of 2023· [2025] KEELRC 1449 (KLR)

Khagali v Music Copyright Society of Kenya (Cause E1071 of 2023) [2025] KEELRC 1449 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
22 May 2025
2,667 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~11 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Employment Court confirmed that firing an employee on or after a lapsed probation without notice or a hearing is unfair, awarding the employee over Kshs 565,000.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Claimant, employed as Personal Assistant to the Respondent's Chief Executive Officer by letter dated 5th May 2022 on a six-month probationary contract later extended by three months, claimed he was dismissed on 30th October 2023 without notice, a show-cause letter or a disciplinary hearing, and sought declarations of unfair termination, one month's pay in lieu of notice (Kshs 84,486), pending allowances and per diems (Kshs 949,000), four months' salary as damages (Kshs 452,400), a certificate of service and interest. The Respondent admitted the employment but asserted the Claimant was on probation, that his performance was unsatisfactory, and that a probationer could not be subjected to a disciplinary process nor was entitled to notice or allowances. The court framed two issues: whether the termination was unfair and whether the reliefs were deserved. Relying on Monica Munira v Mount Kenya University and Evans Kiage Onchwari, it held probationary employees enjoy procedural fairness; moreover, the extended probation lapsed on 9th April 2023, so the Claimant stood confirmed by operation of law and Sections 41, 43, 45 and 47 of the Employment Act applied. The termination was therefore unfair. One month's pay in lieu of notice was allowed as admitted; four months' salary was awarded as compensation; the per diem claim failed for want of proof. The claim succeeded partially, with costs and interest to the Claimant.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether termination of a probationary employee without notice or hearing is unfair

Holding

Yes - probationary employees are entitled to notice and procedural fairness; further, the Claimant's probation having lapsed, he was confirmed by operation of law and the termination was unfair

Reasoning

The court held that a probationary contract does not oust constitutional and statutory fair-labour protections, citing Monica Munira v Mount Kenya University which declared Section 41(2) unconstitutional in so far as it excludes probationers. It further found that the extended probation lapsed on 9th April 2023 while dismissal occurred on 30th October 2023, so the Claimant stood confirmed by operation of law. The Respondent's admission that no hearing was given confirmed unfair termination.

p. 5
02

Whether the Claimant was entitled to one month's pay in lieu of notice

Holding

Allowed - RW1 confirmed no notice was issued nor paid in lieu, despite the HR manual requirement

Reasoning

The Respondent's witness conceded in cross-examination that the HR manual required one month's notice, but the Claimant was not given notice nor paid in lieu. The court treated this as admitted and allowed the claim as prayed.

p. 6
03

Whether the Claimant proved the claim for pending allowances and per diems of Kshs. 949,000/-

Holding

Dismissed - not proven

Reasoning

Although committee appointment letters were produced, they attached no payments to the appointments. Payment requests were approved nearly a year before dismissal, and no additional evidence showed they went unpaid. The court thus found the per diem claim unproven.

p. 6

Legal principles established

#
  • Where an extended probationary period lapses without confirmation or further extension, the employee stands confirmed by operation of law and is entitled to full procedural fairness under the Employment Act before termination.
  • Employees on probation are entitled to both notice and procedural fairness just like any other workers.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.A declaration that the Claimant's termination was unfair and unlawful
  2. 2.1 month's salary in lieu of notice at Kshs. 113,100/-
  3. 3.4 months' salary as compensation for the unfair termination at Kshs. 452,400/-
  4. 4.The Respondent shall bear the costs of the suit and interest from the date of this judgment until payment in full

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Employment Act, 2007Section 20
  • Employment Act, 2007Section 36
  • Employment Act, 2007Sections 41, 41(2), 42(1), 43, 45 (including 45(1) & (2) and 45(3)), 47, 49, 50
  • Regulation of Wages and Conditions of Employment ActNot specified
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Articles 24, 41

Cases cited (5)

  • Cooperative Bank of Kenya Limited v Yator (Civil Appeal 87 of 2018) [2021] KECA 95 (KLR)
    [2021] KECA 95 (KLR)
  • Monica Munira & 6 Others v. Mount Kenya University (2021) eKLR
    (2021) eKLR
  • Evans Kiage Onchwari v Hotel Ambassadeur Nairobi [2016] eKLR
    [2016] eKLR
  • Samwel G. Momanyi v The Attorney General & Another
  • Mary Njoki Karingithi v. Emralo Hotels Resorts & Lodges Limited (2014) eKLR
    (2014) eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Employment and Labour Relations Court jurisdiction under the Employment Act, 2007 (original jurisdiction over employment disputes)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Khagali v Music Copyright Society of Kenya (Cause E1071 of 2023) [2025] KEELRC 1449 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). Cause No E1071 of 2023. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2025/1449/eng@2025-05-22

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.