Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedNot stated in judgment· [2025] KEELRC 1235 (KLR)

KUDHEIHA Workers Union Dika Shunu Dawa v Diani Marine Limited & another (Cause E037 of 2024) [2025] KEELRC 1235 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
30 April 2025
1,511 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~6 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court awarded a security guard terminal dues despite a signed discharge voucher, but cut claims to the 3-year and 12-month statutory deadlines.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The claimant union filed this claim on behalf of the grievant, Dika Shunu Dawa, a security guard employed by the respondents under six-month back-to-back contracts for 20 years, retiring on 13 October 2022 at a monthly wage of Ksh.12,000. The claim sought service pay, salary underpayments, overtime, house allowance, public holiday pay, leave travelling allowance and annual leave. The respondents, though served, took a consented hearing date, remained absent and called no evidence. The court held that a fixed-term contract is lawful and claims arising from it fall under section 89 of the Employment Act: three years generally, and 12 months for continuing injuries such as overtime. The executed discharge voucher could not negate statutory entitlements to lawful terminal dues. On the merits, the court found no underpayment since the wage paid exceeded the applicable minimum wage inclusive of house allowance, and to seek more would be unjust enrichment. Under Regulation 17 of the Regulation of Wages [Protective Security Services] Order 1998, the grievant was awarded gratuity at 15 days per year for the last three years, computed at Ksh.36,000, following Kibiru v Mars Security Guards. Overtime of Ksh.73,000 was awarded on the grievant's uncontroverted testimony, the respondents having failed to file work schedules. The public holiday claim failed for want of particulars; 33 leave days were awarded at Ksh.13,200, leave not being capable of accumulating beyond 18 months; and the leave travelling allowance claim failed for lack of evidence and contractual basis. Judgment was entered for the claimant against the respondents in the total terminal dues awarded, with costs assessed at Ksh.50,000.

Key legal issues

#
01

Effect of discharge voucher on statutory terminal dues

Holding

The discharge voucher executed by the grievant does not bar claims for lawful terminal dues under the Employment Act

Reasoning

The respondents relied on a signed discharge voucher releasing future claims. The court held that unlike commercial disputes, an employee may challenge non-payment of lawful terminal dues, and a discharge voucher cannot negate statutory entitlements where dues are lawfully established.

p. 3
02

Limitation under section 89 for continuing injuries

Holding

Overtime and similar continuing injuries must be claimed within 12 months from cessation; other fixed-term contract claims within 3 years

Reasoning

Applying Kenya Railways Corporation v Ododa, the court limited the overtime claim to the last contracts going back one year, holding that accrued overtime is a continuing injury claimable within 12 months of cessation of employment.

p. 3
03

Service pay/gratuity entitlement

Holding

Gratuity of 15 days' pay per full year worked is due under Regulation 17 of the Protective Security Services Order for the last 3 years; assessed at Ksh.36,000

Reasoning

The grievant was a security guard covered by the Protective Security Services Order 1998. Following Kibiru v Mars Security Guards, he was entitled to gratuity at 15 days per full year worked for the contracts within the 3-year limitation window, computed at his wage of Ksh.12,000.

p. 3
04

Salary underpayment claim

Holding

No underpayment; the wage paid exceeded the statutory minimum inclusive of house allowance

Reasoning

The applicable minimum wage for a security guard in October 2022 was Ksh.8,109.90 basic plus 15% house allowance, grossing Ksh.9,326.35. The grievant earned Ksh.12,000, so the claim for underpayment failed and seeking more would be unjust enrichment.

p. 3
05

Overtime, public holidays and annual leave

Holding

Overtime of Ksh.73,000 awarded on uncontroverted evidence; public holiday claim dismissed for lack of particulars; 33 leave days awarded at Ksh.13,200 as leave cannot accumulate beyond 18 months

Reasoning

Respondents failed to file work schedules or leave records as required under sections 10(6), (7), 74 and 28 of the Act. The grievant's testimony of 14-hour days was accepted for overtime. The public holiday claim failed as general and unparticularised.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • A fixed-term contract is lawful, runs on its terms and requires no notice or reasons for termination
  • Claims arising from fixed-term contracts must be brought within 3 years under section 89, and continuing injuries within 12 months from cessation
  • A discharge voucher cannot be used to negate an employee's statutory entitlements such as lawful terminal dues
  • An employee claiming under the Protective Security Services Order bears an evidential burden to establish breach of its provisions

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Judgment entered for the claimant against the respondents for terminal dues of Service/gratuity Ksh.36,000; Leave pay Ksh.13,200; Overtime pay Ksh.73,000
  2. 2.Costs assessed at Ksh.50,000 payable by the respondents to the claimant
Jurisdiction invoked
Employment and Labour Relations Court jurisdiction over employment disputes (Employment Act; dispute reported to the Minister under the Labour Institutions Act)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "KUDHEIHA Workers Union Dika Shunu Dawa v Diani Marine Limited & another (Cause E037 of 2024) [2025] KEELRC 1235 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). Not stated in judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2025/1235/eng@2025-04-30

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.