Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedNot stated on the face of the judgment (application by Notice of Motion dated 12.02.2025)

Board of Management, Nzeveni Secondary School v Makumbi (Appeal E001 of 2025) [2025] KEELRC 1159 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
24 April 2025
878 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~4 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court paused an employment case because an appeal over whether the claim is time-barred could end it without a full trial.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The applicant, the Board of Management of Nzeveni Secondary School, moved the Employment and Labour Relations Court by Notice of Motion dated 12.02.2025 under Sections 1A, 1B and 3A of the Civil Procedure Act and Order 42 Rule 6 and Order 51 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010, seeking a stay of further proceedings in Makueni MCELRC E001 of 2023 (Michael Musyimi Makumbi v. The Board of Management, Nzeveni Secondary School) pending an appeal against a ruling delivered on 31.01.2025 dismissing its preliminary objection dated 02.08.2023. The memorandum of appeal was dated 05.02.2025. The respondent opposed through the replying affidavit of Michael Musyimi Makumbi, arguing the preliminary objection was properly dismissed, the appeal raised no triable issues, no nugatory prejudice was demonstrated, and the balance of convenience favoured continuation of the suit to protect his right to access justice and a fair trial without delay. After considering the parties' final submissions, the court held that the stay should be granted, albeit for a short time: the applicant had already filed the record of appeal so the interlocutory appeal could be determined without delay, and the ruling under appeal concerned limitation; if the appeal succeeded, the time and costs of a full trial would be saved. The court allowed the application, stayed the trial proceedings pending the appeal, directed sequential filing of submissions within 14 days each, directed the parties to agree a mention date and permitted compromise of the appeal, made costs of the application abide the appeal's outcome, and directed the Deputy Registrar to return the case file to Machakos Court Sub-registry.

Questions the Court framed

#

The issues the Court set itself to decide, in its own words.

  1. 1.Whether a stay of further proceedings in Makueni MCELRC E001 of 2023 should be granted pending the hearing and determination of the interlocutory appeal against the ruling of 31.01.2025 dismissing the applicant's preliminary objection

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether stay of further proceedings in the trial court should issue pending an interlocutory appeal on limitation

Holding

The application was allowed and proceedings in the trial court stayed pending the appeal

Reasoning

The court found the applicant had already filed the record of appeal, so the interlocutory appeal could be heard without further delay. It also found that the ruling appealed against concerned whether the suit is time barred; an affirmative answer on appeal would save the time and costs of a trial that might then be set aside. A short stay of proceedings was therefore in the interests of both parties and the trial court.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • A stay of further proceedings may be granted where the appeal is interlocutory, the record of appeal has been filed, and the appeal concerns a time-bar issue whose affirmative answer would render a full trial of the suit unnecessary, saving time and costs for both parties and the trial court

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Stay of further proceedings in Makueni MCELRC E001 of 2023 pending the hearing and determination of the appeal
  2. 2.The appellant to file submissions on the appeal in 14 days
  3. 3.The respondent to file and serve submissions on the appeal in 14 days thereafter
  4. 4.Parties to agree on mention date for directions on judgment on appeal; parties may compromise the appeal
  5. 5.Costs of the application to abide outcome of the pending appeal
  6. 6.The Deputy Registrar to forthwith return the case file to Machakos Court Sub-registry

The bench

#

One judgment of the whole court — no separate or dissenting opinions.

majority

Wrote the judgment

On appeal from
Employment and Labour Relations Court, Makueni (MCELRC)
E001 of 2023 (Michael Musyimi Makumbi v. The Board of Management, Nzeveni Secondary School)
Jurisdiction invoked
Sections 1A, 1B, 3A of the Civil Procedure Act, Cap 21 and Order 42 Rule 6 and Order 51 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010

Relief refused

#

Costs of the application to the applicant

Costs were not awarded to either party; they were made to abide the outcome of the pending appeal

p. 3

Costs

Costs of the application to abide outcome of the pending appeal

Quotable passages

#

Verbatim from the judgment, each located to the page it appears on in the official PDF — so these can be cited and checked directly.

The applicant has already filed the record of appeal and it should be possible to hear and determine the otherwise interlocutory appeal without a further delay.
p. 2Prompt hearing of interlocutory appeal as ground for stay
The trial Court’s ruling being appealed against is about whether the suit is time barred.
p. 3Nature of the ruling under appeal
There be stay of further proceedings in Makueni MCELRC E001 of 2023 Michael Musyimi Makumbi Vs. The Board of Management, Nzeveni Secondary School pending the hearing and determination of the appeal herein.
p. 3Final orders - stay granted
Costs of the application to abide outcome of the pending appeal.
p. 3Final orders - costs

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Board of Management, Nzeveni Secondary School v Makumbi (Appeal E001 of 2025) [2025] KEELRC 1159 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). Not stated on the face of the judgment (application by Notice of Motion dated 12.02.2025). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2025/1159/eng@2025-04-24

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.