Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedNot stated on the face of the judgment (appeal from Mombasa CMELRC No. E491 of 2022)· [2025] KEELRC 993 (KLR)

Onago v Ufanisi Freighters (K) Limited (Appeal E212 of 2024) [2025] KEELRC 993 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
27 March 2025
1,505 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~6 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan truck driver who stopped reporting for duty lost most of his claims, winning only pay for 14 public holidays worked.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This was a first appeal to the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Mombasa against the judgment of the learned magistrate delivered on 12 September 2024 in Mombasa CMELRC No. E491 of 2022, dismissing a driver's claims for notice pay, 12 months' compensation, underpayments, public holidays, unpaid leave, Sundays worked and overtime following alleged termination on 21 July 2022. The appellant argued constructive dismissal, contending he was locked out by a notice pinned at the gate without a fair hearing. The respondent maintained the appellant was on leave, deserted duty, declined to resume work, filed a premature suit and remained absent until 25 August 2022, with a consolidated wage inclusive of house allowance and no authorised overtime. The court, exercising its first appellate jurisdiction, held the appellant's case was not constructive dismissal; that failure to report to work amounted to gross misconduct under section 44 of the Employment Act, though the employer must summon the employee and end the relationship by notice; that no underpayment arose because the consolidated wage was lawful under section 31 and the appellant was contracted as a truck driver rather than a heavy commercial driver, with continuing-injury claims limited to 12 months under section 89; and that the Sunday and overtime claims failed as uncontradistinguished and unapproved. However, the respondent did not challenge the claim for 14 public holidays worked, entitling the appellant to Ksh.15,653.85. The appeal was allowed only to that extent, with each party bearing its own costs. Judgment was delivered in open court at Mombasa on 27 March 2025 by M. Mbarũ, Judge.

Key legal issues

#
01

Constructive dismissal

Holding

The appellant's case was not constructive dismissal; finding a notice pinned at the gate and responding with a demand notice indicating he had other duties does not establish constructive dismissal

Reasoning

The alleged notice pinned at the gate was never filed in evidence. The appellant's own letter of 22 July 2022 sought confirmation of termination and gave an ultimatum while indicating he had other duties and needed to look for another job. The court held this conduct inconsistent with constructive dismissal as defined in the cited authority, and that the magistrate correctly applied the law in dismissing the notice pay and compensation claims.

p. 3
02

Desertion and gross misconduct under section 44 of the Employment Act

Holding

The appellant deserted duty; failure to report to work, even where the employer has reported the matter to the labour office, is gross misconduct, and the employer must end the relationship by notice

Reasoning

The respondent's case was that the appellant was allowed leave and declined to resume duty; he filed suit and remained absent until 25 August 2022. Under section 44 such absence is gross misconduct. However, the employer must first summon the employee to address the matter before issuing a notice terminating employment. The court nonetheless found the magistrate correctly dismissed these claims.

p. 3
03

Underpayment claims and limitation

Holding

No underpayment; the wage was consolidated inclusive of house allowance, and underpayments as continuing injuries are limited to 12 months

Reasoning

Each fixed-term contract created a distinct relationship. The wage of Ksh.33,544 was consolidated under section 31 of the Employment Act. Further, the appellant's contract described him as a truck driver, not a heavy commercial driver, so the higher wage order rate did not apply. Any continuing-injury claim could only reach back 12 months, rendering earlier claims time-barred.

p. 3
04

Public holidays, Sundays and overtime

Holding

The appellant was entitled to Ksh.15,653.85 for 14 unchallenged public holidays; the Sunday and overtime claims failed

Reasoning

The respondent did not challenge the claim for 14 public holidays worked under the last contract, so compensation was awarded. The rest day under section 27 need not be Sunday and the appellant did not contradistinguish that claim. Overtime must be approved where hours are agreed; mechanical problems with the truck did not amount to authorised overtime and the claims were exaggerated.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • Failure to report to work as required is gross misconduct under section 44 of the Employment Act; the employee must be summoned and, on failure, the employer may end the employment by notice
  • Claims for a continuing injury under section 89 of the Employment Act can only go back 12 months from cessation
  • A consolidated wage inclusive of house allowance is permitted under section 31 of the Employment Act
  • Overtime must be approved where hours of work are agreed under a fixed-term contract

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Appeal allowed only to the extent of an award of Ksh.15,653.85 for work during 14 public holidays
  2. 2.Each party to bear its own costs
On appeal from
Magistrates' Court (ELRC), Mombasa
Mombasa CMELRC No. E491 of 2022
Jurisdiction invoked
First appellate jurisdiction over the trial magistrate's decision in Mombasa CMELRC No. E491 of 2022

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Onago v Ufanisi Freighters (K) Limited (Appeal E212 of 2024) [2025] KEELRC 993 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). Not stated on the face of the judgment (appeal from Mombasa CMELRC No. E491 of 2022). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2025/993/eng@2025-03-27

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.