Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCDismissedKisumu ELRC Case (application arising from Kisumu CMC ELRC No. 5 of 2019)· [2025] KEELRC 921 (KLR)

Kibos Sugar & Allied Industries v Amuna (Miscellaneous Case E014 of 2025) [2025] KEELRC 921 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
24 March 2025
3,118 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~12 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kibos Sugar lost its bid to appeal a 2019 employment judgment because it waited seven months without explaining the delay, and Kenyan courts treat that as fatal.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a ruling of the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Kisumu (Gakeri J) on the applicant's (Kibos Sugar & Allied Industries Ltd) Notice of Motion dated 6th February 2025 seeking leave to appeal out of time against the judgment of 22nd November 2019 in Kisumu CMC ELRC No. 5 of 2019, as reinstated on 4th April 2024 following the applicant's breach of a consent setting aside that judgment, together with a stay of execution. The respondent (Catherine Akinyi Amuna) opposed the application, contending it was res judicata and sub judice given prior rulings by Radido J (28th June 2024) and Makau J (22nd January 2025), that a similar application had been dismissed, that the decretal sum of Kshs.404,515 had been released to her, and that the application was brought after inordinate and unexplained delay. The applicant neither replied nor filed submissions. The court reviewed the settled principles for extension of time, holding that the applicant took over seven months after the striking out of its appeal to file the application, gave no explanation for that delay, and misrepresented that the application was made without undue delay. Although the court accepted that the intended appeal was arguable, it held that unexplained delay was fatal, and accordingly declined to determine the sub judice and res judicata questions. The Notice of Motion was dismissed with no orders as to costs, delivered virtually at Kisumu on 24th March 2025.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the delay in seeking leave to appeal out of time was satisfactorily explained

Holding

The court held the delay unexplained; the applicant waited over seven months after the appeal was struck out and misrepresented that the application was made without undue delay

Reasoning

The supporting affidavit was silent on when the appeal was struck out and gave no reason for the seven months taken to file the application. The court inferred there was no reason. Since a satisfactory explanation is a foundational pillar of an extension-of-time application, the application collapsed and the sub judice and res judicata issues did not fall for determination.

p. 6
02

Whether the intended appeal was arguable

Holding

The court found the applicant had an arguable appeal, but arguability alone could not save the application

Reasoning

The court accepted that arguability does not imply success and that a single arguable issue suffices. The grounds - statute-barred claims, right to be heard, late payment of thrown away costs, and insufficiency of evidence - rendered the appeal arguable. However, this could not cure the unexplained delay, which was fatal.

p. 6

Legal principles established

#
  • An applicant for extension of time bears the burden of explaining the delay to the satisfaction of the court; an unexplained delay is fatal to the application
  • Prolonged and inordinate delay disentitles an applicant to leave to appeal out of time

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The applicant's Notice of Motion dated 6th February 2025 and filed on 7th February 2025 is dismissed with no orders as to costs
Jurisdiction invoked
Sections 1A, 1B, 3A, 79G and 95 of the Civil Procedure Act and Order 50 Rule 5 of the Civil Procedure Rules

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kibos Sugar & Allied Industries v Amuna (Miscellaneous Case E014 of 2025) [2025] KEELRC 921 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). Kisumu ELRC Case (application arising from Kisumu CMC ELRC No. 5 of 2019). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2025/921/eng@2025-03-24

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.