Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCDismissedNot stated in the judgment (Memorandum of Appeal dated 29th April 2024; Lower Court cause CMMCC No. 340 of 2018)· [2025] KEELRC 626 (KLR)

Washe v Kilifi Plantations Limited (Appeal E016 of 2024) [2025] KEELRC 626 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court / High Court as constituted - judgment does not state the court on its face; delivered by Ocharo Kebira, Judge
3 March 2025
1,326 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~5 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan appeal filed nearly six months late, without the court's permission, was thrown out because no one first applied for leave to appeal out of time.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Appellant, a former employee, had sued the Respondent by plaint dated 13th September 2018 seeking general and special damages for injuries sustained in the course of employment. On 25th March 2021 the trial magistrate, holding that a work injury benefits claim fell outside the court's jurisdiction following the Supreme Court decision in Law Society of Kenya v the A.G and another (Petition No. 4 of 2019), struck out the suit with costs. The Appellant later moved the lower court by a Notice of Motion dated 12th May 2023 seeking reinstatement of the suit, relying on the Chief Justice's directions that work injury matters filed before 3rd December 2019 should proceed to conclusion. The Respondent opposed, arguing the suit had been struck out procedurally, that the law does not operate retrospectively, and that the Chief Justice's directions concerned pending matters only. On 7th November 2023 the trial magistrate dismissed the application with costs. The Appellant filed the present memorandum of appeal on 29th April 2024 seeking to set aside that ruling and to have the suit heard on merit. Ocharo Kebira J restated the role of a first appellate court but found the appeal fatally defective: it was lodged approximately five and two-thirds months after the ruling, outside the statutory period, and the record disclosed no leave to file out of time. Absent such leave, the court lacked jurisdiction. The appeal was dismissed with costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the court had jurisdiction to hear an appeal filed outside the statutory period without leave

Holding

The appeal, lodged five and two-thirds months after the ruling of 7th November 2023, was out of time and no leave for extension was sought or granted; the court therefore lacked jurisdiction and dismissed the appeal

Reasoning

The court noted that the impugned ruling was delivered on 7th November 2023 and the memorandum of appeal was dated 29th April 2024, roughly five and two-thirds months later, which is outside the statutory period for filing an appeal. A review of the record of appeal disclosed no grant of leave to file the appeal out of time. Without such leave, the court could not assume jurisdiction over the appeal, and the only proper order was dismissal with costs.

p. 4
02

Role of a first appellate court

Holding

The court restated that a first appellate court must re-evaluate the evidence and material before the trial court and draw its own conclusions, citing Selle v Associated Motor Boat Co.

Reasoning

Before the court could reach the merits raised in the grounds of appeal, it restated the settled principles governing first appeals: the appellate court reconsiders the evidence, evaluates it and draws its own conclusions, while making allowance for the fact that it neither saw nor heard the witnesses, and is not bound by trial court findings of fact where they fail to account for material circumstances or probabilities.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • A first appellate court must subject the evidence and material before the trial court to fresh scrutiny and come to its own independent findings and conclusions
  • An appeal filed out of time without leave of the court cannot be entertained for want of jurisdiction

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The appeal is dismissed with costs
On appeal from
Principal Magistrate's Court (trial court in CMMCC No. 340 of 2018)
CMMCC No. 340 of 2018
Jurisdiction invoked
First appellate jurisdiction over an appeal from the magistrates' court; appeal filed outside the statutory period without leave

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Washe v Kilifi Plantations Limited (Appeal E016 of 2024) [2025] KEELRC 626 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). Not stated in the judgment (Memorandum of Appeal dated 29th April 2024; Lower Court cause CMMCC No. 340 of 2018). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2025/626/eng@2025-03-03

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.