Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCDismissedApplication dated 15th May, 2024 (arising from Kajiado CMEL Cases E055 and E076 of 2021 and ELRCA/E0155/2022 Nairobi)· [2025] KEELRC 530 (KLR)

Masai Rolling Mills Limited v Kunukha & another; Masai Rolling Mills Limited (Appellant); Ongaki & another (Respondent) (Appeal E141 of 2024) [2025] KEELRC 530 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
24 February 2025
1,001 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~4 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court dismissed a bid to revive employment appeals out of time, ruling the existing appeal's judgment will govern everything.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Appellant, through an application dated 15th May 2024, sought extension of time to file appeals against the judgments in Kajiado CMEL Cases E055 and E076 of 2021 (delivered on 22nd and 23rd June 2022), consolidation of those appeals with ELRCA/E0155/2022 Nairobi, and stay of execution. The Applicant explained the delay of over 13 months as an advocate's inadvertent mistake in filing the memoranda of appeal at the High Court at Kajiado instead of the Employment and Labour Relations Court, noting that security for costs (the decretal sum) had been deposited in an interest-earning account held by both advocates. The Respondents, Joseph Wafula Kunukha and Charles Mbaka Ongaki, opposed the application, contending that the High Court had dismissed the appeals after upholding a preliminary objection on jurisdiction, rendering the intended appeals res judicata; further, that the delay was inordinate and unexplained, and that a non-existent appeal cannot be consolidated with an ongoing one. The court held that a dismissal by a court without jurisdiction does not amount to a determination on the merits and therefore cannot found a plea of res judicata; the appeals properly lie before the ELRC. On leave to appeal out of time, the court declined to exercise its discretion, finding the application superfluous since a substantive appeal (ELRCA E155 of 2022) arising from one of the consolidated lower court causes was pending judgment on the very date the application was to be ruled upon, and that judgment would conclusively determine the issues in the intended appeals. The application was dismissed with no orders as to costs, and the court ordered that the judgment in ELRCA No. E155 of 2022 apply across the intended appeals.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the appeals dismissed for want of jurisdiction by the High Court at Kajiado are res judicata

Holding

The appeals are not res judicata because the High Court lacked jurisdiction; they are properly before the Employment and Labour Relations Court, the court with jurisdiction

Reasoning

The Respondents argued that the appeals having been dismissed at Kajiado High Court after a preliminary objection was upheld, they were res judicata and the ELRC lacked jurisdiction. The court held that a dismissal for want of jurisdiction is not a determination on the merits. The appeals therefore properly belong before the court with jurisdiction, which is the ELRC, and cannot be deemed res judicata.

p. 3
02

Whether leave should be granted to file the appeals out of time

Holding

The court declined to determine the issue, finding the application superfluous because the pending judgment in the substantive appeal ELRCA E155 of 2022 would conclusively determine the issues in the intended appeals

Reasoning

Three causes were consolidated at the lower court and one of them, ELRCA E155 of 2022, was already a substantive appeal pending judgment on the same date the application was due for ruling. Any determination in that substantive appeal would affect the intended appeals. The court thus found the extension-of-time application superfluous and dismissed it rather than exercising its discretion on leave.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • A dismissal by a court lacking jurisdiction does not amount to a determination on the merits and cannot found a plea of res judicata

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The application dated 15th May, 2024 is dismissed
  2. 2.No orders as to costs
  3. 3.The judgment of ELRCA No. E155 of 2022 to apply across the intended appeals
On appeal from
Chief Magistrate's Court at Kajiado (CMEL) and High Court at Kajiado
Kajiado CMEL Case Numbers E055, E076 and E009 of 2021
Jurisdiction invoked
Article 48, 50(1) and 159 of the Constitution of Kenya; section 12 of the Employment and Labour Relations Court Act; sections 1A, 3A, 79G and 95 of the Civil Procedure Act; Order 42 rule (6) of the Civil Procedure Rules

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Masai Rolling Mills Limited v Kunukha & another; Masai Rolling Mills Limited (Appellant); Ongaki & another (Respondent) (Appeal E141 of 2024) [2025] KEELRC 530 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). Application dated 15th May, 2024 (arising from Kajiado CMEL Cases E055 and E076 of 2021 and ELRCA/E0155/2022 Nairobi). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2025/530/eng@2025-02-24

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.