Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCAllowedCause No E008 of 2023· [2025] KEELRC 424 (KLR)

Kamau v Rai Plywoods (Kenya) Ltd (Cause E008 of 2023) [2025] KEELRC 424 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
13 February 2025
1,912 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~8 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court confirmed employers can deduct PAYE from employment awards, and paying the net amount fully settles the judgment.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This was a judgment-debtor's application dated 6th December 2024 arising out of a judgment delivered on 7th March 2024 and a decree issued on 7th May 2024 in an employment claim. The parties had entered a consent on 4th September 2024 on the mode of satisfaction of the decree. The Respondent/Judgment-Debtor paid the consent sum but deducted statutory deductions (PAYE), which the Claimant/Decree-Holder disputed, insisting on gross payment. The Claimant then instructed Lister Auctioneers, who proclaimed and attached the Applicant's property, including motor vehicle KBH 777V, under Warrants of Attachment dated 12th November 2024. The Applicant sought stay of execution, setting aside of the proclamation and attachment, release of the motor vehicle, a declaration that the decretal sum is subject to PAYE and statutory deductions, and that auctioneer's fees be borne by the Claimant. The Claimant's replying affidavit denied full compliance with the consent, citing arrears for November and December 2024 and a default clause, and maintained that neither the decree nor the consent provided for statutory deductions. Deciding the application on the pleadings without submissions, Maureen Onyango J held that section 49(2) of the Employment Act mandatorily subjects section 49 payments to statutory deductions, that terminal benefits are taxable under the Income Tax Act, and that no exemption exists under Article 210 of the Constitution. Adopting the Industrial Court's decision in Hosea Njeru Kagondu v Kenya Union of Commercial Food and Allied Workers [2012] eKLR, the court held the Applicant was obliged to deduct and remit PAYE and pay the decree-holder the balance, which constituted full and final satisfaction of the decree. The application dated 6th December 2024 was allowed with costs, and the auctioneer's fees and charges were ordered to be paid by the Claimant. Judgment delivered virtually on 13th February 2025.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the decretal sum was subject to statutory deductions

Holding

Yes. Section 49(2) of the Employment Act mandatorily subjects payments under section 49(1) to statutory deductions, and under the Income Tax Act the employer must deduct and remit PAYE; no exemption applies under Article 210 of the Constitution.

Reasoning

Section 49(2) of the Employment Act provides that any payments made by the employer under the section shall be subject to statutory deductions, the word 'shall' being mandatory. Terminal benefits are taxable under the Income Tax Act, and employers are agents for deduction and remittance of PAYE from income from employment. Article 210 of the Constitution permits exemption only by law, and none applies here. The Hosea Njeru Kagondu ruling to the same effect was adopted.

p. 4
02

Whether the decree was satisfied

Holding

Yes. Once the Applicant deducted and remitted PAYE and paid the balance, the decree was satisfied in full and final; no further execution could lie unless the Claimant disputes the amount deducted and remitted to KRA.

Reasoning

The court found the Applicant obliged to deduct and remit PAYE and pay the decree-holder the difference. Since this is a legal requirement, courts need not state it in every judgment, there being a presumption that everyone knows the law. Absent a complaint by the Claimant about the amount deducted and remitted to KRA, the net payment was full and final satisfaction of the decretal sum.

p. 5
03

Liability for auctioneer's fees following the attachment

Holding

The Claimant/Decree-Holder, having instructed auctioneers after receiving payment, is liable for the auctioneer's fees and charges.

Reasoning

Having found that payment net of PAYE constituted full and final satisfaction, any subsequent proclamation and attachment was unwarranted. The court therefore held that where a decree-holder instructs an auctioneer after receiving such payment, the fees and charges of the auctioneer fall on the decree-holder, and made a express order to that effect for the avoidance of doubt.

p. 5

Legal principles established

#
  • Payments under section 49 of the Employment Act are mandatorily subject to statutory deductions; decretal sums in employment claims are subject to PAYE which the employer/judgment-debtor must deduct and remit to KRA.
  • Payment of the decretal sum net of lawful statutory deductions constitutes full and final satisfaction of the decree.
  • Where a decree-holder instructs an auctioneer after receiving satisfaction of the decree, the auctioneer's fees are the decree-holder's liability.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Stay of execution sought in the application was rendered unnecessary by the finding of full satisfaction (application allowed)
  2. 2.The Proclamation Notice and attachment by Lister Auctioneers set aside (application allowed in its entirety)
  3. 3.The amount paid to the Claimant after deduction of PAYE was in full and final satisfaction of the decretal sum
  4. 4.The auctioneer's fees and charges are to be paid by the Claimant
  5. 5.The application dated 6th December, 2024 is allowed with costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Employment Actsection 49(1) and 49(2)
  • Income Tax ActPAYE deduction and remittance provisions (not specifically numbered)
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 210

Cases cited (1)

  • Hosea Njeru Kagondu v Kenya Union Of Commercial Food And Allied Workers
    [2012] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Court seised of its own decree; application under the court's execution and satisfaction jurisdiction (Employment Act, Income Tax Act considered)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kamau v Rai Plywoods (Kenya) Ltd (Cause E008 of 2023) [2025] KEELRC 424 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). Cause No E008 of 2023. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2025/424/eng@2025-02-13

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.