Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCDismissedNot stated in the excerpt (Employment and Labour Relations Court Cause)· [2025] KEELRC 358 (KLR)

Kenya Union of Commercial Food and Allied Workers v Director General/CEO, Kenya National Library Service (Cause E129 of 2024) [2025] KEELRC 358 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
13 February 2025
1,607 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~6 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court ruled that CBA benefit claims start counting from when the agreement is registered, not when an employee retires.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Respondent filed a Notice of Preliminary Objection dated 22nd April 2024 seeking to strike out the Claimant's Statement of Claim on two jurisdictional grounds: first, that the claim was time barred under Section 90 of the Employment Act, 2007, the grievant having retired on 3rd March 2020 so that any claim should have been filed by March 2023; and second, that under Gazette Notice Number 6024 of 10th June 2018, the matter ought to have been filed in the Magistrates' Court since the grievant earned less than Kshs. 80,000/=. The Claimant, a union acting for grievant James Muriuki Njue, opposed through a Replying Affidavit and written submissions, contending that the claim arose from three Collective Bargaining Agreements (2012-2021) whose registration and implementation were delayed by the involvement of the Salaries and Remuneration Commission, with the 2017-2021 CBA registered on 16th October 2021 and implemented in December 2021 when other employees were paid but the grievant's arrears were omitted; limitation therefore ran from December 2021 and the claim, filed on 19th February 2024, was in time. The Claimant further argued that a claim that has gone through conciliation as a trade dispute under the Labour Relations Act is not subject to the Kshs. 80,000/= salary ceiling. Applying the Mukisa Biscuit test, the Court found the benefits sought only became payable on registration of the CBAs, so the cause of action accrued in December 2021, and that the union claim, having gone through conciliation, was a trade dispute not affected by the salary limit. The Court dismissed the objection with costs to the Claimant, holding the suit properly before it.

Key legal issues

#
01

Limitation under Section 90 of the Employment Act

Holding

The suit is not statute barred because the cause of action accrued in December 2021 when the CBA was registered and arrears fell due, and the claim was filed in February 2024, within three years

Reasoning

The Respondent argued the cause of action arose on the grievant's early retirement effective 3rd March 2020, so the claim was time barred by March 2023. The Court found that the arrears claimed flowed from the CBAs (2012-2021), which were only registered with the 2017-2021 CBA registered on 16th October 2021 and implemented in December 2021 when other employees were paid. The benefits only became payable then, so limitation ran from December 2021 and the claim filed on 19th February 2024 was in time.

p. 4
02

Whether the claim ought to have been filed in the Magistrates' Court under the Gazette Notice

Holding

No - the claim is a trade dispute that went through conciliation under the Labour Relations Act, 2007, lodged by a union on behalf of a member, and is not affected by the Kshs. 80,000/= salary limit

Reasoning

The Respondent relied on Gazette Notice No. 6024 of 10th June 2018 to argue that the matter belonged in the Magistrates' Court because the grievant earned less than Kshs. 80,000/=. The Court held that the issues had been placed before a conciliator and gone through conciliation as a trade dispute under the Labour Relations Act, and that a union claim on behalf of a member is in every sense a trade dispute, not an ordinary claim subject to the salary ceiling. The suit was therefore properly before the ELRC.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • Where benefits claimed under CBAs only became payable on registration of the CBAs, the cause of action accrues on registration/when payment fell due, not on the employee's retirement
  • A union claim that has gone through conciliation as a Trade Dispute under the Labour Relations Act is not subject to the Kshs. 80,000/= salary ceiling in the Gazette Notice conferring jurisdiction on the Magistrates' Court

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Respondent's Notice of Preliminary Objection dated 22nd April, 2024 is dismissed
  2. 2.Costs of the objection to the Claimant

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Employment ActSection 90
  • Employment ActGeneral (2007)
  • Limitation of Actions ActSection 4(1)
  • Labour Relations Act2007

Cases cited (2)

  • Mukisa Biscuit Manufacturing Co. Ltd –vs West End Distributors Ltd
    (1969) EA 696
  • Michira & 41 others v Aegis Kenya Ltd t/a Leopard Beach Hotel
    (Cause E088 of 2023) [2023] KEELRC 2551 (KLR) (19 October 2023)
Jurisdiction invoked
Employment and Labour Relations Court jurisdiction under the Labour Relations Act, 2007 and Employment Act, 2007 (Section 90 limitation invoked in the objection)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kenya Union of Commercial Food and Allied Workers v Director General/CEO, Kenya National Library Service (Cause E129 of 2024) [2025] KEELRC 358 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). Not stated in the excerpt (Employment and Labour Relations Court Cause). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2025/358/eng@2025-02-13

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.