Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedNot stated in the judgment· [2025] KEELRC 342 (KLR)

Deloraine Estates Limited v Shikuku (Employment and Labour Relations Appeal E020 of 2022) [2025] KEELRC 342 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
12 February 2025
2,645 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~11 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan employment appeal court ruled the employee resigned voluntarily, cancelling a Kshs 380,426 award but ordering interest for delayed payment of dues.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The respondent employee resigned by letter dated 16th July 2017, which the appellant employer accepted on 20th July 2017, undertaking to pay final dues. The trial magistrate (Hon. B. Ochieng) found the respondent had been coerced into resigning and had in effect been declared redundant irregularly, awarding compensation for unfair termination, one month's salary in lieu of notice, public holidays, annual leave and severance pay totalling Kshs. 380,426/-. On appeal by way of an amended Memorandum of Appeal dated 15th September 2022, canvassed by written submissions, the ELRC at Nakuru (Anna Ngibuini Mwaure, J) framed a single issue: whether the appeal was merited. Applying Section 107 of the Evidence Act, the court found no evidence of coercion in the resignation letter, which expressly recorded that the respondent had decided to resign, and held he had voluntarily resigned. It further held there was no evidence the respondent was terminated on account of redundancy, reasoning that a court cannot act on presumption but on facts. The court concluded the trial court erred in finding irregular termination by redundancy. The appeal was allowed, the judgment of 18th August 2022 was set aside, and interest at 14% per annum was awarded from 20th July 2017 to 2019 for the employer's inordinate delay in paying terminal dues, with the appellant to calculate and settle the interest. Each party was ordered to meet their respective costs of the appeal and the lower court proceedings. Judgment was delivered virtually at Nakuru on 12th February 2025.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the respondent voluntarily resigned or was coerced into resigning

Holding

The respondent voluntarily resigned; there was no evidence of coercion in the resignation letter dated 16th July 2017.

Reasoning

Applying Section 107 of the Evidence Act, the party alleging coercion must prove it. The resignation letter stated the respondent had decided to resign, and it contained no indication of threats or coercion. The respondent collected his dues roughly two years later, undermining the coercion claim. The trial court's contrary inference from the date discrepancy was erroneous.

p. 5
02

Whether the respondent was declared redundant by the appellant

Holding

There was no evidence of redundancy; the trial court erred in finding the respondent was irregularly declared redundant.

Reasoning

The record contained only the resignation letter and its acceptance; nothing showed termination on account of redundancy. Redundancy under Section 40 of the Employment Act requires a fair procedure and notices, none of which appeared on the record. The court cannot act on presumption but on facts.

p. 5
03

Whether the awards for compensation, notice pay, public holidays, annual leave and severance pay were sustainable

Holding

The awards lacked legal and evidential basis once the resignation was established, and the judgment was set aside; however, the respondent was awarded interest for the inordinate delay in paying his dues.

Reasoning

Having found a voluntary resignation, entitlements flowing from unfair termination or redundancy fall away, following Hassanath Wanjiru v Vanela House of Coffee where a resigned claimant was held not entitled to the prayers sought. The court nonetheless lamented the two-year delay in paying dues and compensated it with interest.

p. 6

Legal principles established

#
  • A party alleging coercion to resign bears the burden of proving it under Section 107 of the Evidence Act; absent such proof, the resignation is treated as voluntary.
  • A court cannot presume redundancy; termination on account of redundancy must be proved by facts and evidence.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The court ordered interest be paid to the respondent at 14% per annum from 20th July 2017 to 2019, with the appellant to calculate and settle the interest
  2. 2.The judgment delivered by Hon. B. Ochieng on 18th August 2022 is set aside
  3. 3.Each party will meet their respective costs of the appeal and of the lower court proceedings

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Employment ActSection 40
  • Employment ActSection 2
  • Employment ActSection 35
  • Employment ActSection 36
  • Employment ActSection 74
  • Evidence Act (Chapter 80 of the Laws of Kenya)Section 107
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 159(2)(d)
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 48
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 21 Rule 1
  • Civil Procedure Act (Chapter 21 of the Laws of Kenya)Section 1B

Cases cited (11)

  • China Zhongxing Construction Company Limited V Ann Akuru Sophia
    [2020] eKLR
  • Selle V Associated Motor Boat Company Ltd
    [1969] EA 123
  • Evans Otieno Nyakwana V Cleophas Bwana Ongaro
    [2015] eKLR
  • Niraj Dharmadhikhari V Professional Media Africa
    Nairobi ELRC No. 622 of 2017
  • Mary Nyawira Karimi V Pure Circle (K) Limited
    [2018] eKLR
  • Kenya Airways Limited versus Aviation and Allied Workers Union Kenya and Others
    [2014] eKLR
  • Mutinda V Lavington Security Limited
    [2023] KEELRC 3332 (KLR)
  • Prideinn Hotels & Investment Limited v Madzungu
    [2022] KECA 764 (KLR)
  • Tobias Ongaya Auma & 5 Others -vs- Kenya Airways
    (2007) eKLR
  • Hassanath Wanjiru -vs- Vanela House of Cofiee
    454 N of 2009
  • Black's Law Dictionary 9th Edition
On appeal from
Chief Magistrate's Court
Not stated in the judgment
Jurisdiction invoked
First appellate jurisdiction over the trial magistrate's judgment in an employment claim (statutory basis not expressly stated in the judgment)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Deloraine Estates Limited v Shikuku (Employment and Labour Relations Appeal E020 of 2022) [2025] KEELRC 342 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). Not stated in the judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2025/342/eng@2025-02-12

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.