Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCOtherELRC Cause No. 616 of 2015 (formerly Mombasa High Court Civil Case No. 164 of 2005)· [2025] KEELRC 332 (KLR)

Ddaiddo v Bank of India (Cause 616 of 2015) [2025] KEELRC 332 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
6 February 2025
874 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~3 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Employment Court ruled it could not act on a dispute after the Court of Appeal stripped it of jurisdiction, sending the 20-year-old case back to the High Court.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The applicant, Francois Makorani Ddaiddo, filed two applications: one dated 27 August 2024 seeking to restrain the respondent from evaluating, attaching, removing or selling his property known as Plot No. 1921/Section II/MN (his matrimonial home), and another dated 5 August 2024 seeking transfer of the file to the Mombasa High Court. The dispute began as Mombasa High Court Civil Case No. 164 of 2005, was transferred to the ELRC in 2015 and registered as Cause No. 616 of 2015, and was dismissed with the counterclaim on 16 July 2021. The Court of Appeal, in judgment delivered on 21 June 2024 in Mombasa Civil Appeal No. E082 of 2021, declared the suit time-barred and held that the ELRC had no jurisdiction to entertain the counterclaim. The respondent filed preliminary objections dated 30 October 2024 seeking striking out of the applications as an abuse of process, arguing the court lacked jurisdiction. The court held that, following the Court of Appeal judgment, it could not take any further step in the matter, and that the interim orders issued on 29 August 2024 lapsed. Acting in the interests of justice given the stalemate, the court directed that the file revert to the Mombasa High Court for directions, ordered the Deputy Registrar to move the file to the High Court Registry, and closed ELRC Cause No. 616 of 2015. No costs order was made.

Key legal issues

#
01

Jurisdiction to entertain post-judgment applications where the Court of Appeal has declared the ELRC without jurisdiction

Holding

The ELRC has no jurisdiction to hear or determine the applications and cannot issue directions; the applications and interim orders fall away.

Reasoning

The Court of Appeal on 21 June 2024 declared the applicant's suit time-barred and held that the ELRC had no jurisdiction to entertain the respondent's counterclaim. Once a superior court has determined that a court lacks jurisdiction, that court cannot take any further step in the matter, including issuing directions or maintaining interim orders, even where a stalemate results.

p. 3
02

How to address the resulting stalemate between the parties

Holding

In the interests of justice, and notwithstanding the want of jurisdiction to entertain the dispute, the file is directed to revert to the High Court for directions and the ELRC file is closed.

Reasoning

The Court of Appeal judgment left the dispute unresolved: the respondent was instructed to evaluate the applicant's matrimonial home for auction while no court had adjudicated the dispute. The court, acting on administrative housekeeping rather than adjudicative jurisdiction, directed that the file be returned to the High Court where the suit originated.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • A court without jurisdiction cannot issue any directions or interim orders, however desirable the outcome in the interests of justice.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Interim orders issued on 29 August 2024 lapse with the ruling
  2. 2.The file shall revert to the Mombasa High Court for directions in the interests of justice
  3. 3.The ELRC Deputy Registrar shall move the file to the Mombasa High Court Registry
  4. 4.ELRC Cause No. 616 of 2015 is hereby closed
On appeal from
Court of Appeal (Mombasa Civil Appeal No. E082 of 2021)
Mombasa Civil Appeal No. E082 of 2021
Jurisdiction invoked
Court held it lacks jurisdiction following the Court of Appeal judgment; no statutory basis invoked

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Ddaiddo v Bank of India (Cause 616 of 2015) [2025] KEELRC 332 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). ELRC Cause No. 616 of 2015 (formerly Mombasa High Court Civil Case No. 164 of 2005). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2025/332/eng@2025-02-06

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.