Sawe v Ekaterra Tea Kenya PLC (Cause E012 of 2023) [2025] KEELRC 285 (KLR)
The bottom line
#A Kenyan employment court froze an Sh8 million award because both the employer and employee are appealing the judgment.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Whether stay of execution pending appeal should be granted
Stay granted because both parties challenge the core findings and remedies of the judgment and have filed Notices of Appeal and Cross-Appeal
Both parties filed Notices of Appeal disclosing an Intended Appeal and Intended Cross-Appeal. The Claimant's Cross-Appeal challenges the finding of valid reason for dismissal, redundancy, and the quantum of notice pay and compensation, while the Respondent's Draft Memorandum of Appeal challenges procedural and substantive justice findings. The Court held that the other stay principles need not be examined; it sufficed that both parties challenge fundamental aspects of the judgment and have sought trial proceedings for their appeals. The judgment must remain frozen.
Legal principles established
#- Where both parties are dissatisfied with a judgment and have both expressed intent to challenge it on appeal, execution of that judgment should be stayed so each party can exercise their right of appeal.
Court orders
#- 1.Execution of Judgment/Decree of the Court made on 18th July 2024 stayed pending filing, hearing and determination of the Intended Appeal and Cross-Appeal
- 2.No order on the costs
- On appeal from
- Not stated (interlocutory application in the same suit)
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Discretionary jurisdiction of the Employment and Labour Relations Court to stay execution of its own judgment pending appeal (not expressly cited in the extract)
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Sawe v Ekaterra Tea Kenya PLC (Cause E012 of 2023) [2025] KEELRC 285 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). Not stated in the extract. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2025/285/eng@2025-02-07
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.