Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCDismissedThika MCERLC Appeal No. E012 of 2022 (memorandum of appeal dated 9th May 2023)· [2025] KEELRC 242 (KLR)

Ongayo v Everflora Limited (Employment and Labour Relations Appeal 068 of 2023) [2025] KEELRC 242 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
31 January 2025
6,322 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~25 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan worker who claimed he was fired lost his appeal because evidence showed he was never actually dismissed, though he must get his certificate of service.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a first appeal to the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi (J.W. Keli, J) against the judgment of Hon. O. Wanyaga (SRM) in Thika MCERLC No. E012 of 2022, delivered on 26th April 2023, dismissing the appellant-claimant's employment claim with half costs. The appellant, a general labourer who suffered a workplace injury in a greenhouse, alleged he was orally dismissed on 1st December 2021 and sought unpaid November 2021 salary, notice pay, underpayments, 12 months' compensation for wrongful dismissal, unremitted NSSF deductions, leave pay, leave travelling allowance, overtime, public holidays, rest days, a certificate of service, interest and costs. The respondent contended the appellant was never dismissed but deserted duty, remained in the company house, and ran a barber shop. The court adopted the issues framed by the appellant, applied the first appellate duty of re-evaluation of evidence, and upheld the trial court's finding that the employment had not been terminated as at the filing of the suit on 7th April 2022, finding it unbelievable the respondent would have housed the appellant had it dismissed him on 1st December 2021. Consequently the unfair termination question was moot and all monetary reliefs failed: the November salary was unrebutted as paid less 6 days' deduction; notice pay could not apply absent termination; the agricultural industry wages order applied and the underpayment was negligible; leave was taken; and overtime/holiday/rest-day claims were not supported by the witness statement. The appeal was dismissed save for an unconditional certificate of service under section 51 of the Employment Act, with no order as to costs to temper mercy with justice.

Key legal issues

#
01

When was the Appellant terminated from employment?

Holding

The employment of the Appellant had not been terminated as at the time he filed the suit on 7th April 2022; the court upheld the trial court's finding that the employment was not terminated.

Reasoning

The court found the minutes of the meeting of 18th November 2021 showed the appellant was present and signed, agreeing to resume duty on 19th November 2021, and the show cause letter dated 30th November 2021 was received and answered by a request for unpaid leave. The appellant admitted receiving notice dated 10th May 2022 to vacate the employer's house. The court found it unbelievable that the respondent would allow the appellant to keep living in its house if it had terminated his services on 1st December 2021 as alleged.

p. 7
02

Was the Appellant unlawfully and unfairly terminated?

Holding

The issue was moot because the court had upheld the finding that the employment was not terminated.

Reasoning

Having upheld the trial court's finding that the employment had not been terminated by the time of filing suit, the court held that the question whether the termination was unlawful or unfair did not arise for determination.

p. 10
03

Whether the Appellant was entitled to the reliefs sought (salary, notice, underpayments, leave, overtime, holidays, rest days)

Holding

All monetary reliefs failed; the claims were either not proved, not pleaded in evidence, or defeated by the applicable agricultural wages order; only the certificate of service was awarded.

Reasoning

The November salary claim was not proved as the response of a 6-day deduction was unrebutted. Notice pay could not apply absent termination. The agricultural industry wages order applied and the difference between Kshs. 7,500 with housing and the statutory minimum of Kshs. 7,544.65 was negligible. Leave was taken as unpaid leave. Overtime, public holiday and rest day claims were not in the witness statement and were not proved.

p. 12

Legal principles established

#
  • A first appellate court must re-evaluate, re-assess and re-analyze the evidence on the record and determine whether the conclusions reached by the trial court are to stand, giving reasons either way.
  • Under section 47(5) of the Employment Act the burden of proving unfair termination or wrongful dismissal rests on the employee, while the burden of justifying the grounds for termination rests on the employer.
  • An employer relying on desertion of duty must show efforts were made to get in touch with the deserted employee and must issue reasonable notice that termination is being considered.
  • A certificate of service must issue unconditionally under section 51 of the Employment Act.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Appeal dismissed as without merit save that a certificate of service shall issue unconditionally to the Appellant under Section 51 of the Employment Act
  2. 2.No order as to costs in the appeal

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Employment ActSection 74
  • Employment ActSection 47(5)
  • Employment ActSection 43(1)
  • Employment ActSection 45
  • Employment ActSection 35(1)(c)
  • Employment ActSection 41
  • Employment ActSection 46
  • Employment ActSection 51
  • Regulation of Wages (General) (Amendment) Order, 2018
  • Legal Notice 1 of 2018
  • Regulations of Wages (Agricultural Industry) Amendment Order, 2022 (Agricultural And Wages Order of 2022)
  • Limitation of Actions Act

Cases cited (4)

  • Abok James Odera T/A A.J Odera & Associates v John Patrick Machira T/A Machira & Co. Advocates
    [2013] KECA 208 (KLR)
  • Evans Ochieng Oluoch -Vs- Njimia Pharmaceutical Limited
    [2016] eKLR
  • James Ondima Kabesa -vs- Trojan International Limited
    [2017] eKLR
  • Naima Khamis -vs- Oxford University Press (E.A) Ltd
    [2017] eKLR
On appeal from
Senior Resident Magistrate's Court, Thika
Thika MCERLC No. E012 of 2022
Jurisdiction invoked
First appeal from the subordinate court in employment and labour relations matters (ELRC jurisdiction over appeals from magistrates' courts in labour disputes)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Later judgments citing this (1)

#

Judgments in the corpus that rely on this one. Where the Court said how it treated the authority, that is shown.

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Ongayo v Everflora Limited (Employment and Labour Relations Appeal 068 of 2023) [2025] KEELRC 242 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). Thika MCERLC Appeal No. E012 of 2022 (memorandum of appeal dated 9th May 2023). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2025/242/eng@2025-01-31

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.