Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedCause No E057 of 2024· [2025] KEELRC 213 (KLR)

Ochieng & another v Pride Kings Services Ltd (Cause E057 of 2024) [2025] KEELRC 213 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
30 January 2025
2,603 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~10 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Two Kenyan employees who resigned after months without pay won their salary arrears and NSSF refunds, but lost bigger claims for lacking evidence.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
Two claimants sued their former employer in the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Kisumu, claiming they were owed unpaid salaries, allowances, service pay, unremitted NSSF deductions, overtime, public holiday pay, off-working day pay, leave arrears, general damages, costs and interest. The 1st claimant alleged he resigned on 23rd November 2023/2024 without being paid for five months; the 2nd claimant resigned in early 2024 after six months without pay. The respondent denied the claims, alleging the claimants resigned voluntarily, but its witness did not attend court to testify, leaving only its documents on record, which confirmed the employment relationship and the resignations. The court found both claimants were employees who left by resignation. It rejected the claimants' submission that they were constructively dismissed, holding that neither pleaded nor testified that the respondent's conduct caused their resignation, and that by remaining in employment for long periods despite non-payment of salary they waived and were estopped from relying on the alleged repudiatory breach. The court applied the contractual test for constructive dismissal from Western Excavating v Sharp and Coca Cola v Ligaga. It held that resignation is a unilateral act requiring no acceptance, after which only accrued dues are payable. The court awarded the 1st claimant salary arrears of Kshs.96,000 and the 2nd claimant Kshs.102,000, plus a refund of NSSF deductions made but not remitted and any other dues per the employer's records. Claims for service pay, house allowance, public holidays, off days, overtime, leave and general damages were declined for want of proof, the court treating them as special damages requiring specific pleading and strict proof. Judgment was entered for the claimants with costs and interest. Delivered virtually at Kisumu on 30th January 2025 by Dr. Jacob Gakeri, Judge.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the claimants were constructively dismissed

Holding

No; they resigned voluntarily and did not attribute the resignation to the respondent's conduct

Reasoning

Both claimants resigned in writing and neither testified nor pleaded that they left because of the employer's conduct. Although non-payment of salary is a repudiatory breach, the claimants stayed on too long, amounting to waiver and estoppel from alleging constructive dismissal. Counsel's submissions to the contrary lacked supportive evidence.

p. 4
02

Whether the claimants were entitled to salary arrears and unremitted NSSF dues

Holding

Yes; salary arrears awarded and NSSF deductions deducted but not remitted to be computed and refunded

Reasoning

The employment relationship and resignation were established by the respondent's own letters. After resignation, accrued dues are payable. NSSF deductions are a statutory obligation of the employer; though the Court cannot enforce the NSSF Act, amounts deducted but not remitted are refundable to the claimants.

p. 5
03

Whether claims for overtime, public holidays, ofi days, leave and house allowance were proved

Holding

No; declined for want of specific evidence

Reasoning

These are special damages requiring specific pleading and strict proof. The claimants' witness statements were silent on particulars of the dates, hours and years, and they admitted having no evidence. The house allowance claim failed because it was never raised with the employer nor alleged that salary excluded it.

p. 6

Legal principles established

#
  • Constructive dismissal requires a fundamental/repudiatory breach by the employer and the employee must leave within a reasonable time without acquiescing or waiving the conduct
  • Resignation is a unilateral termination of employment requiring no acceptance by the employer
  • After resignation the employer is liable only for accrued dues
  • Claims for overtime, public holidays, ofi days and leave are special damages requiring specific pleading and strict proof

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Declaration that withholding of the claimants' salary and allowances was unfair
  2. 2.1st claimant: salary arrears of Kshs.96,000.00
  3. 3.2nd claimant: salary arrears of Kshs.102,000.00
  4. 4.Respondent to compute and refund both claimants the total NSSF deductions made but not remitted
  5. 5.Any other dues as per the employer's records for each claimant
  6. 6.Costs of the suit and interest at court rates from the date of judgment until payment in full

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 159(2)(d)
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 48
  • National Social Security Fund ActNot specified
  • Civil Procedure ActSection 1B
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 21 Rule 1

Cases cited (10)

  • Prem Lata V Peter Musa Mbiyu
    [1965] EA 592
  • Milton M. Isanya V Aga Khan Hospital Kisumu
    [2017] eKLR
  • Godfrey Allan Tolo V Tobias O. Otieno & Another
    [2022] eKLRS
  • Nicodemus Ochieng Ogutu V Village of Hope Kenya
    [2018] eKLR
  • Western Excavating (ECC) Ltd V Sharp
    [1978] ICR 222
  • Coca Cola East & Central Africa Ltd V Maria Kagai Ligaga
    [2015] eKL
  • Simon Dludlu V. Emalangeni Foods Industries
    IC Case No. 471/2004
  • David Njuguna Mungai V Registered Trustees of Sisters of Mercy t/a Mater Hospital
    (2015) eKLR
  • Hahu V Singh
    Civil Appeal No. 42 of 1983 (185) KLR 716
  • Jackson K. Kiptoo V Attorney General
    (2009) KLR 657
Jurisdiction invoked
Employment and labour relations jurisdiction (Article 162(2) of the Constitution implied by court character); no express provision stated in the judgment

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Ochieng & another v Pride Kings Services Ltd (Cause E057 of 2024) [2025] KEELRC 213 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). Cause No E057 of 2024. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2025/213/eng@2025-01-30

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.