Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedStatement of Claim dated 10th May 2022· [2024] KEELRC 2797 (KLR)

Banking Insurance and Finance Union v Unaitas Sacco Society Ltd (Cause 328 of 2022) [2024] KEELRC 2797 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
14 November 2024
2,580 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~10 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenyan employers must deduct and remit union dues once five employees join a union — no recognition agreement is needed first.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Claimant trade union sued the Respondent employer, a Sacco-sector operator, seeking a declaration of entitlement to union dues from 202 recruited members, an order compelling the Respondent to deduct and remit dues said to be outstanding from 25th April 2017, and costs. The Respondent resisted, contending the check-off forms failed statutory specifications, the union had not met the recognition threshold, members had countermanded their membership, and section 48(6) of the Labour Relations Act excused non-deduction. Ocharo Kebira J framed two issues. On the first, the court held that section 48(2) of the LRA imposes no requirement of a recognition agreement: the employer's duty arises once the union recruits at least five employees and check-off forms are presented. The forms were found sufficient to enable compliance, and the Respondent could not explain why it had not deducted at least for members whose particulars were proper. Resignation notices not forwarded to the union, as required by section 48(8), could not be relied upon, and even seven resignations could not excuse the duty as to other employees. On the second issue, the court declined the prayer for arrears from April 2017, holding there was no proof dues had been deducted and withheld, and an employer remits only monies actually deducted from salaries. Judgment was entered for the Claimant: the Respondent is bound to deduct union dues from current and future members who signed or sign Form S and remit them, effective 30th December 2024. Each party was ordered to bear its own costs. The claim therefore partially succeeded.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether a recognition agreement is a precondition to deduction and remittance of union dues under section 48 of the Labour Relations Act

Holding

No recognition agreement is required; the employer's duty arises once five or more employees are union members and check-off forms are served

Reasoning

Section 48(2) imposes a statutory duty on an employer of more than five union members to deduct and remit dues once check-off forms are requisitioned. Had the legislature intended a recognition agreement as a precondition it would have said so expressly. The Respondent's reliance on the recognition threshold was misconceived.

p. 5
02

Whether defective or incomplete check-off forms excuse the employer from deducting dues

Holding

Forms containing sufficient details trigger the duty; the employer should have deducted at least for members whose details were proper

Reasoning

The court examined the check-off forms and found they contained details enabling the Respondent to comply. If some forms lacked particulars, the Respondent ought still to have deducted dues for members whose details were in its estimation proper. Non-denial of receipt of the forms was also fatal to the Respondent's defence.

p. 5
03

Effect of resignation notices not forwarded to the union and whether retrospective arrears are payable

Holding

Unforwarded resignations cannot be relied upon; but arrears cannot be ordered because the employer never deducted the dues - only prospective orders issue

Reasoning

Under section 48(6)-(8) resignations take effect the following month and the employer must forward notices to the union. Even assuming seven resignations, the duty remained for other employees. However, the prayer for dues from April 2017 presupposed monies had been deducted but not remitted, which was unproved; an employer pays dues from employees' salaries, not its own account.

p. 6

Legal principles established

#
  • No recognition agreement is required before an employer's statutory obligation to deduct and remit union dues under section 48(2) of the Labour Relations Act arises
  • The employer's obligation to deduct union dues sets in once the union recruits at least five of its employees and check-off forms are presented
  • An employer who receives resignation notices must forward copies to the union under section 48(8) of the LRA; unforwarded notices cannot be relied upon to defeat dues claims

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Respondent is statutorily bound to deduct union dues from the salaries of current and future members of the Claimant union, specifically those who have signed or sign Form S, and remit the same to the Claimant, effective from 30th December 2024
  2. 2.Each party shall bear its own costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Labour Relations Actsection 48(2)
  • Labour Relations Actsection 48(6), (7) and (8)
  • Employment Actsection 19(f)

Cases cited (7)

  • Kenya Plantation and Agricultural Workers Union v Expressions Flora Limited
    (2013) eKLR
  • KUCFAW v Eldomatt Supermarkets Limited
  • Kenya Union of Domestic Hotels Educational Institutions Hospitals & Allied Workers (Kudheiha) v British Army Training Unit Kenya
    (2015) eKLR
  • Transport Workers Union v Automobile Association of Kenya and Kenya Long Distance Truck Drivers & Allied Workers Union
    (2016) eKLR
  • Tailors and Textiles Workers Union v Global Apparels EPZ Limited; Fidelis Omwamba Onsongo & 6 others (Proposed Interested Parties)
    [2019] eKLR
  • Kenya Union of Commercial Food and Allied Work v Mitra Enterprises Limited & another
    (Cause 62 of 2020) [2023] KEELRC 2122 (KLR) (21 September 2023) (Ruling)
  • Kenya Union of Commercial Food and Allied Workers v Mitra Enterprises Limited & another
    [2021] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Employment and Labour Relations Court jurisdiction over trade disputes under the Labour Relations Act, 2007 (section 48)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Banking Insurance and Finance Union v Unaitas Sacco Society Ltd (Cause 328 of 2022) [2024] KEELRC 2797 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). Statement of Claim dated 10th May 2022. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2024/2797/eng@2024-11-14

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.