Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedPetition dated 12th July 2023 (Amended Petition dated 25th August 2023)· [2024] KEELRC 2513 (KLR)

Olang’o v Insight Management Consultants Limited (Employment and Labour Relations Petition E139 of 2023) [2024] KEELRC 2513 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
11 October 2024
4,073 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~16 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court ruled the worker's firing was unfair, but his discrimination claim failed because he offered no evidence to support it.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Petitioner, employed by the Respondent (a human resource and payroll outsourcing firm) and posted to work at Godrej Kenya under designated manager Daljinder Kalsi, alleged that between April 2022 and April 2023 he suffered direct and indirect racial discrimination, humiliation, bullying and degrading treatment, and that the Respondent summarily dismissed him on 5th May 2023 after holding a disciplinary hearing in his absence, to cover up his complaints. The Respondent countered that the Petitioner absconded from 3rd April 2023, feigned illness without proof, and in fact worked at a neighbouring company, Bio Foods Products Limited, and that allegations of discrimination were unsubstantiated. The court framed three issues: discrimination, abscondment, and entitlement to relief. On discrimination, the court applied Article 27 of the Constitution, section 5 of the Employment Act and the burden-of-proof jurisprudence (Gichuru v Package Insurance Brokers; Samson Gwer; Raila Odinga; Mohammed Abduba Dida) and found the Petitioner had discharged no evidential burden; his allegations were mere assertion unsupported by evidence or corroborative witnesses, so that claim failed. On abscondment, the court applied Ayub Kombe Ziro, James Okeyo and Ronaldo Nyambu Daudi, holding that an employer pleading desertion must show diligent efforts to reach the employee and afford procedural safeguards under section 41 of the Employment Act and Articles 41 and 47 of the Constitution. No such evidence existed, so the Petitioner was found unfairly and unprocedurally terminated. The court awarded one month's notice pay (Kshs 23,010), May 2023 salary (Kshs 10,765) and five months' equivalent salary (Kshs 115,050), totalling Kshs 148,816 with interest at 14% per annum, plus costs and a certificate of service within 30 days; the other prayers and unutilized leave claim were not granted.

Key legal issues

#
01

Direct and indirect discrimination

Holding

Petitioner failed to prove discrimination; he merely alleged it without supporting evidence, so the burden never shifted to the Respondent

Reasoning

The court applied Article 27 of the Constitution and section 5 of the Employment Act, and the burden-of-proof principles from Gichuru v Package Insurance Brokers and the Evidence Act sections 108 and 109. The claimant bears the initial evidential burden before it shifts. The Petitioner produced no evidence, affidavit or corroborative witness to substantiate allegations of racial discrimination and degrading treatment by his designated manager.

p. 7
02

Abscondment of duties

Holding

The defence of abscondment was not proved; the Petitioner was unfairly and unprocedurally terminated

Reasoning

An employer pleading abandonment must show reasonable steps to trace the employee, require resumption of duty, and use internal disciplinary channels per section 41 of the Employment Act and Articles 41 and 47 of the Constitution. The Respondent did not demonstrate efforts to put the Petitioner through a disciplinary process, nor inform him of his right to be accompanied at a hearing, so termination was unfair and unprocedural.

p. 8

Legal principles established

#
  • An employer alleging desertion must demonstrate efforts to reach the employee and put him on notice of termination proceedings before pleading abandonment as closure of the contract
  • Desertion does not itself terminate the employment contract; the decision to end the relationship must come from the employer

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Prayers a, b, c and d of the petition dated 12th July 2023 are not granted as unproven
  2. 2.One month salary in lieu of notice Kshs 23,010/=
  3. 3.Salary for days worked in May 2023 Kshs 10,765/=
  4. 4.Five months equivalent salary for unlawful termination Kshs 115,050/=
  5. 5.Total award of Kshs 148,816/= plus interest at 14% p.a from date of judgment till full payment
  6. 6.Costs to the Petitioner
  7. 7.Certificate of service to be issued within 30 days

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of KenyaArticles 27(4), 27(5), 29(f), 41, 47(1), 48, 159(2)(d)
  • Employment Actsections 5(3), 5(7), 41, 47(5)
  • Evidence Actsections 108, 109
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 21 Rule 1

Cases cited (9)

  • Gichuru v Package Insurance Brokers Ltd (Petition 36 of 2019) [2021] KESC 12 (KLR)
    [2021] KESC 12 (KLR)
  • Samson Gwer & 5 others v Kenya Medical Research Institute & 3 others
    [2020] eKLR
  • Raila Odinga & others v Independent Electoral & Boundaries Commission & others, Petition No 5 of 2013
    Petition No 5 of 2013
  • Mohammed Abduba Dida vs. Debate Media Limited & Another
    [2018] eKLR
  • Ayub Kombe Ziro v Umoja Rubber Products Limited
    [2022] eKLR
  • James Okeyo v Maskant Flower Limited
    [2015] eKLR
  • Joseph Nzioka v Smart Coatings Limited
    [2017] eKLR
  • Julius Kyalo Malonza v Ruth Osolo t/a Eraeva Catering Services
    [2021] eKLR
  • RONALDO NYAMBU DAUDI -VS- TORNADO CARRIERS LIMITED
    (2019) eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Articles 41, 47 of the Constitution and the Employment Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Olang’o v Insight Management Consultants Limited (Employment and Labour Relations Petition E139 of 2023) [2024] KEELRC 2513 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). Petition dated 12th July 2023 (Amended Petition dated 25th August 2023). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2024/2513/eng@2024-10-11

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.