Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCDismissedNot stated in the extract· [2024] KEELRC 2219 (KLR)

Kenya Building, Construction, Timber & Furniture Industries Employees Union v Laminates Furniture Limited (Cause E359 of 2024) [2024] KEELRC 2219 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
18 September 2024
3,769 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~15 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court dismissed a union's bid to force deduction of members' dues because its affidavit exhibits were unsealed and it abandoned ongoing conciliation too early.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Claimant Union moved the Court by Notice of Motion dated 9th May, 2024 seeking orders directing the Respondent to resume deductions and remittances of union dues of 22 members who had joined it and signed Form S. The union deposed that after recruiting 23 of 29 employees and submitting Form S and a Model Recognition Agreement, the Respondent refused to sign the Recognition Agreement, disrupted conciliation, refunded union dues without written resignation, and sought to declare employees redundant to defeat the union. The Respondent opposed, contending the Supporting Affidavit was invalid because the commissioning advocate, S.K.M. Wandaka, did not appear in the LSK database; that exhibits were not sealed as required by Rule 9 of the Oaths and Statutory Declarations Rules; and that the application was premature as conciliation was on-going. The Court framed three issues. On validity, it accepted the Practicing Certificate of the advocate (Stanley Mwangi Kinuthia Wandaka) as genuine but found none of the annexures was sealed under the Commissioner's seal, a mandatory requirement, and struck out the exhibits. On prematurity, it held that under Section 69 of the Labour Relations Act the 30-day period applies only when conciliation is not on-going; conciliation meetings were still scheduled when the suit was filed, and the union could not unilaterally abandon a binding conciliation process contrary to Article 159(2)(c). Consequently, the Notice of Motion was dismissed, with each party bearing their own costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Validity of the Supporting Affidavit and exhibits

Holding

The exhibits annexed to the Supporting Affidavit were struck out for non-compliance with Rule 9; the Supporting Affidavit was therefore found to lack validity

Reasoning

Rule 9 of the Oaths and Statutory Declarations Rules is mandatory and requires exhibits to be securely sealed and marked with serial letters of identification. None of the annexures was sealed. Applying the authorities cited, the exhibits were struck out, rendering the application unsupported. On commissioning, the Court found the Practicing Certificate of Stanley Mwangi Kinuthia Wandaka genuine despite the LSK portal search returning no result.

p. 6
02

Prematurity of the Notice of Motion

Holding

The application was premature as conciliation was on-going when the suit was filed and the Claimant abandoned the process mid-way without justification

Reasoning

Section 69 of the Labour Relations Act deems a dispute unresolved either upon a Conciliator's Certificate or expiry of 30 days. The Court held the 30-day period is triggered only when no conciliation is taking place. Evidence showed conciliation meetings were still being convened, and the Claimant filed suit three days after a scheduled meeting without evidence of its outcome. Conciliation under Article 159(2)(c) is binding and cannot be unilaterally abandoned.

p. 7
03

Entitlement to the reliefs sought

Holding

The Claimant was not entitled to the reliefs; the Notice of Motion was dismissed

Reasoning

Having found the Supporting Affidavit invalid, the exhibits struck out and the suit premature, no foundation remained for the orders directing resumption of union dues deductions. The Court declined to compel deduction and remittance of union dues, holding the Claimant should have completed conciliation or obtained a Conciliator's Certificate.

p. 8

Legal principles established

#
  • A dispute is deemed unresolved under Section 69 of the Labour Relations Act only after a Conciliator's Certificate issues or expiry of the 30-day period, and the 30-day period applies only where conciliation is not on-going; a party who invokes conciliation cannot unilaterally abandon it and rush to court
  • Exhibits to affidavits must be securely sealed under the seal of the Commissioner for Oaths and marked with serial letters of identification; unsealed, unmarked annexures are inadmissible

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Claimant's Notice of Motion dated 9th May, 2024 is dismissed
  2. 2.The exhibits annexed to the Supporting Affidavit of Julius Macharia Maina are struck out of the record for purposes of the instant Notice of Motion
  3. 3.Each party to bear their own costs
Jurisdiction invoked
Article 159(2)(c) of the Constitution and Sections 69 and 74 of the Labour Relations Act; ELRC (Procedure) Rules, 2016

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kenya Building, Construction, Timber & Furniture Industries Employees Union v Laminates Furniture Limited (Cause E359 of 2024) [2024] KEELRC 2219 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). Not stated in the extract. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2024/2219/eng@2024-09-18

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.