Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially Allowed· [2024] KEELRC 2195 (KLR)

Karimi v Katheri Farmers Co-operative Society Limited (Cause E022 of 2023) [2024] KEELRC 2195 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
12 September 2024
3,579 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~14 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court ruled that unpaid wages for six months and endless suspension forced a manager's resignation, awarding her 12 months' salary.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The claimant, employed by the respondent from 1st October 1999 and promoted to Factory Manager in 2009 and to Senior Factory Manager in 2013, sued on 28th December 2023 seeking declarations of constructive dismissal and violation of her rights, salary increments from 2013, terminal dues, general damages of one year's salary, costs and interest. The respondent denied constructive dismissal, contending she evaded disciplinary hearings and mutual separation and voluntarily resigned. The claimant testified she was suspended on 17th July 2023, kept on suspension beyond the 60-day cap in the CBA, unpaid from February 2023, and resigned on 14th November 2023. The respondent's witnesses denied withholding salary, denied a permanent Senior Factory Manager position, and alleged misconduct including manipulation of cherry weights. The court framed two issues: whether the resignation amounted to constructive dismissal, and entitlement to reliefs. It found constructive dismissal established on two grounds only: suspension beyond the 60-day maximum without recall, and non-payment of salary for over six months. Allegations of hostile treatment and discriminatory transfers were not proved. The court awarded 12 months' gross salary (Kshs.324,120.00) under Section 49 of the Employment Act, declined the claim for salary increments from 2013 for lack of demonstration, and directed the respondent to compute terminal dues under Clause 18 of the CBA and file a report within 30 days. Judgment was entered for the claimant with costs and interest, subject to statutory deductions.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the claimant's resignation amounted to constructive dismissal

Holding

Yes. The resignation was involuntary, caused by prolonged suspension beyond the 60-day CBA maximum and non-payment of salary for over six months.

Reasoning

The court found the claimant was suspended without a stated duration, never recalled after the 60-day contractual cap, and unpaid throughout the suspension. Although salary issues affected other employees too, the employer's breaches fundamentally prevented the claimant from performing her contractual obligations, entitling her to resign and treat the separation as a dismissal. Allegations of general hostility and discriminatory transfers were not proved.

p. 6
02

Whether the claimant was entitled to salary increments from 2013 for the Senior Factory Manager position

Holding

No. The claim for increments was declined because the basis was not demonstrated and evidence showed her salary had increased.

Reasoning

The promotion letter never mentioned salary and no confirmation letter issued. The respondent demonstrated the claimant's basic pay rose from Kshs.13,000 to Kshs.19,174 by October 2023, undermining the assertion that she was denied all increments, so the prayer was declined.

p. 7
03

Whether the claimant was entitled to terminal dues and service pay

Holding

Yes, in principle. Under Clause 18 of the CBA she is entitled to terminal benefits, to be computed by the respondent and filed in court for adoption within 30 days.

Reasoning

The claim was not quantified, but the court noted the CBA entitlement, awarded terminal dues for 24 years of service, and directed the respondent to compute them and file a report for adoption within 30 days of judgment.

p. 7
04

Remedies for the constructive dismissal

Holding

The claimant was awarded 12 months' gross salary (Kshs.324,120.00) as compensation for unlawful dismissal under Section 49 of the Employment Act, 2007.

Reasoning

The court considered her 24 years of service, unproved performance and disciplinary issues, her age and reduced employability, and exercised its discretion under Section 49 to award twelve months' gross salary based on the October 2023 payslip.

p. 7

Legal principles established

#
  • Failure to pay an employee's salary for six consecutive months and suspension beyond the contractual maximum of 60 days without pay are grounds upon which constructive dismissal may be inferred.
  • For constructive dismissal to be inferred, the employee must resign within a reasonable time as a result of the employer's hostile working conditions, and the employer must not have expressed a desire to terminate the employee.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Declaration that the respondent has constructively dismissed the claimant.
  2. 2.Award of Kshs.324,120.00 for the unlawful dismissal.
  3. 3.Terminal dues under clause 18 of the CBA, with the respondent directed to compute the terminal dues payable to the claimant based on Clause 18 of the CBA and file a report in court for adoption within 30 days of the judgment.
  4. 4.Costs and interest at court rates from the date of the judgment.
  5. 5.The award is subject to statutory deductions.

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Employment ActSection 49
  • Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA)Clause 15 (suspension capped at 60 consecutive days on half pay)
  • Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA)Clause 18 (terminal benefits)
  • ELRC Procedure RulesRule 28(3)

Cases cited (3)

  • Godfrey Allan Tolo v Tobias O.Otieno & another
    (2022) eKLR
  • Enid Nkirote Mukire v Kenya Yearbook Editorial Board
    (2022) eKLR
  • Kenya Union of Sugarcane Plantation and Allied Workers v Othira
    (Appeal E005 of 2023) (2024) KEELRC 843 (KLR) (18 April 2024)
Jurisdiction invoked
Employment and Labour Relations Court jurisdiction under the Employment Act, 2007 (first-instance employment claim)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Karimi v Katheri Farmers Co-operative Society Limited (Cause E022 of 2023) [2024] KEELRC 2195 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). . Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2024/2195/eng@2024-09-12

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.