Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedCause No 683 of 2019· [2024] KEELRC 2133 (KLR)

Kinyanjui v Equity Bank (K) Limited (Cause 683 of 2019) [2024] KEELRC 2133 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
29 July 2024
4,188 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~17 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan bank lawfully fired a credit officer for poor loan appraisals, but must pay his full salary for the eight months he sat on unpaid suspension.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Claimant, employed by the Respondent bank as a Relationship Officer-Micro Credit from 26th July 2010, was terminated on 10th January 2017 for an irregular and un-procedural loan appraisal exposing the bank to an exposure of Kshs.5,180,000/=. He sued for declarations of unlawful and discriminatory termination, reinstatement or re-engagement, 12 months' compensation, leave dues, withheld suspension salary of 8 months, and travelling expenses. The Respondent maintained that the termination met Sections 41 and 45 of the Employment Act. The court framed three issues: fairness of termination, discrimination, and reliefs. On evidence, the Claimant admitted he never saw the matatu financed and never entered the client's premises, relying only on a SACCO income schedule. The court found the Respondent proved, on a preponderance of probabilities, a valid and fair reason for termination, and that two show-cause letters, adequate notice and a disciplinary hearing satisfied Section 41, rendering the termination substantively and procedurally fair. The discrimination claim failed for want of particulars. The declarations, reinstatement (time-barred as more than three years had elapsed since termination), discrimination compensation, leave dues and travelling expenses were all declined for want of merit or proof. However, adopting Rika J.'s reasoning that administrative suspension is not a disciplinary sanction and an employee under contract should not go unpaid, the court awarded the Claimant full salary for the 8-month suspension period and a certificate of service, with each party bearing its own costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the reason for termination was valid and fair

Holding

The Respondent had a valid and fair reason

Reasoning

The Claimant admitted on cross-examination that he did not see the matatu or enter the client's house and relied on the SACCO's income schedule. The court found he did not conduct proper KYC and never saw the assets, exposing the bank to risk of loss. On a preponderance of probabilities, irregular and un-procedural loan appraisal was a valid and fair reason under Sections 43 and 45 of the Employment Act.

p. 7
02

Whether the procedure followed was fair under Section 41

Holding

The procedure was procedurally fair

Reasoning

The Claimant received a suspension letter, two show-cause letters to which he responded, and a disciplinary hearing held 15th December 2016 to which he could bring a fellow employee, before termination on 10th January 2017. The court found he was accorded sufficient time to prepare his defence and an opportunity to be heard, meeting the Section 41 threshold.

p. 8
03

Whether the Claimant was discriminated against

Holding

No discrimination proved

Reasoning

The Claimant alleged that colleagues on the credit committees were not terminated while he was, amounting to discrimination. The court found that particulars of the alleged discrimination were neither set out nor proved; allegations that others were surcharged or spared were unproven, so the discrimination claim and its compensation failed.

p. 9
04

Entitlement to salary withheld during the 8-month suspension

Holding

Claimant awarded full salary for the suspension period

Reasoning

Relying on Rika J. in Sheikh Abubakar Bwanakai Abdallah v Judicial Service Commission, the court held that administrative suspension is not a disciplinary sanction; the employment contract subsisted with mutuality of obligations. The appointment letter was silent on the percentage of pay during suspension, so the court awarded full salary for the 8 months.

p. 9

Legal principles established

#
  • For a termination to be fair there must be a valid and fair reason and a fair procedure
  • The employer need only genuinely believe on reasonable basis that the ground for termination exists (Section 43(2))
  • Administrative suspension is not a disciplinary sanction and an employee on suspension while still under contract should not go without any salary

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Full salary during the period of suspension unless already paid
  2. 2.Certificate of service
  3. 3.Each party to bear their own costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 47
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 50(4)
  • Employment Act, 2007Sections 41, 42(1), 43(2), 44(3) and (4), 45, 49(3)(a), 49(4), 51
  • Employment and Labour Relations Court Act, 2011Section 12(3)(vii)

Cases cited (12)

  • Peter Mutinda Ngei v Rentokil Initial Limited
    [2022] eKLR
  • Peter Kamau Mwaura vs Peter Njanja Njunguna v National Bank of Kenya
    [2020]
  • National Union of Mineworkers & others v The Commission for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration & 2 others
    JR 2910/08
  • Gichuru v Package Insurance Brokers Ltd
    (Petition 36 of 2019) [2021] KESC 12 (KLR)
  • Walter Ogal Anuro v Teachers Service Commission
    [2013] eKLR
  • Naima Khamis v Oxford University Press (EA) Ltd
    [2017] eKLR
  • Galgalo Jarso Jillo v Agricultural Finance Corporation
    [2021] eKLR
  • Pius Machafu Isindu v Lavington Security Guards Ltd
    [2017] eKLR
  • Loice Otieno v Kenya Commercial Bank
    [2013] eKLR
  • Postal Corporation of Kenya v Andrew K. Tanui
    [2019] eKLR
  • Sheikh Abubakar Bwanakai Abdallah v Judicial Service Commission & another
    [2017] eKLR
  • Kenya Airways Ltd v Aviation & Allied Workers Union Kenya & 2 others
Jurisdiction invoked
Employment and Labour Relations Court jurisdiction under the Employment Act, 2007 and the Employment and Labour Relations Court Act, 2011 (employment dispute)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kinyanjui v Equity Bank (K) Limited (Cause 683 of 2019) [2024] KEELRC 2133 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). Cause No 683 of 2019. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2024/2133/eng@2024-07-29

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.