Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedNot stated in the judgment (ELRC Appeal from Nyeri CMCC)· [2024] KEELRC 1902 (KLR)

Karanja v ADN Security Ltd (Appeal E012 of 2023) [2024] KEELRC 1902 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
19 July 2024
1,499 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~6 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court ruled the employee quit without notice, so her unfair dismissal claim failed, but her unpaid leave, salary and benefits claims go back for a fresh hearing.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The appellant sued the respondent in the lower court seeking a declaration that her employment was unfairly and unlawfully terminated through summary dismissal, plus Kshs.454,266 in compensatory damages and accrued benefits. The trial court (Hon F. Muguongo, PM) dismissed the entire suit with costs on the basis that the appellant admitted leaving employment without notice. On appeal to the ELRC at Nyeri, Onesmus N Makau J framed three issues: whether the appellant was summarily dismissed or resigned; whether any dismissal was unfair; and whether the reliefs were merited. The court found, from the appellant's own cross-examination admissions, that she was not summarily dismissed but absconded and quit without notice, and that constructive dismissal was never pleaded; the unfair termination claim therefore failed, as did salary in lieu of notice and compensatory damages. However, the court agreed that the trial court had failed to determine the claims for unpaid leave, rest days, house allowance, service pay and unpaid salary. The respondent relied on an Employee Settlement, Release and Discharge Agreement, but the court rejected it as a valid discharge because it comprised several pages signed between June and July 2021 without explanation, and the respondent adduced no evidence that any dues were actually paid. The appeal was partially allowed and the suit remitted to the lower court for determination of the undetermined accrued-benefits claims by a judicial officer other than Hon. F. Muguongo-PM, with costs of the appeal to the appellant.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the appellant was summarily dismissed or resigned

Holding

She was not summarily dismissed; she absconded and quit without notice, so the trial court rightly found no summary dismissal

Reasoning

The appellant admitted in cross-examination that she never went to the redeployment station, never appealed the redeployment, and quit without notice. DW1 confirmed she failed to report to the new workplace. Constructive dismissal was never pleaded. The court therefore upheld the trial court's conclusion on this head.

p. 3
02

Whether the Employee Settlement, Release and Discharge Agreement was a valid discharge of liability

Holding

The court declined to treat the settlement agreement as valid because it comprised pages signed between June and July 2021 with no explanation, and no evidence showed dues were actually paid

Reasoning

Although the appellant admitted signing the agreement and returning her uniform and did not claim she signed involuntarily, she testified no dues were paid and the respondent adduced no evidence of payment. The multi-page document bearing signatures spanning June and July 2021 without explanation led the court to reject it as a valid settlement.

p. 4
03

Whether the trial court adequately determined the claims for accrued benefits

Holding

The trial court failed to determine the claims for unpaid leave, rest days, house allowance, service pay and unpaid salary, requiring remittal

Reasoning

The court agreed with the appellant that the trial court's failure on the unfair dismissal claim was not fatal to the accrued benefits claims, which were never analysed or determined. Partial success on appeal therefore warranted remitting those undetermined matters to the lower court before a different judicial officer.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • On a first appeal, the court must re-evaluate the evidence and reach its own conclusions while bearing in mind that it did not see the witnesses testify
  • An employee who quits employment without notice and who has not pleaded constructive dismissal cannot prove summary dismissal or unfair termination

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The appeal is partially allowed.
  2. 2.The suit is remitted back to the Lower Court for determination of the undetermined matters (unpaid leave, rest days, house allowance, service pay and unpaid salary) by a Judicial Officer other than Hon. F. Muguongo-PM.
  3. 3.Costs of the appeal to the Appellant.

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Employment Actsection 45
  • Employment and Labour Relations Court (Procedure) RulesRule 28(3)

Cases cited (4)

  • Thomas De La Rue (K) Ltd v David Opondo Omutelema
    (2013) eKLR
  • Bernard Juma Oyieyo v Karia Supermarket Limited
    (2018) eKLR
  • Kennedy Obala Oaga v Kenya Ports Authority
    (2018) eKLR
  • Selle v Associated Motor Boat Company Ltd
    (1968) EA 123
On appeal from
Principal Magistrate's Court (Nyeri)
Not stated
Jurisdiction invoked
First appeal from the trial court in employment and labour relations matters under the Employment and Labour Relations Court Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Karanja v ADN Security Ltd (Appeal E012 of 2023) [2024] KEELRC 1902 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). Not stated in the judgment (ELRC Appeal from Nyeri CMCC). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2024/1902/eng@2024-07-19

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.