Nandwa v National Communication Secretariat (Employment and Labour Relations Petition E235 of 2023) [2024] KEELRC 1889 (KLR)
The bottom line
#Kenya's Employment Court ruled that a fixed-term contract that simply expires is not unfair termination, even if renewal was requested and never answered.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Whether non-renewal of a fixed-term contract amounted to unfair, unlawful or malicious termination violating Articles 27, 28, 35, 41, 47 and 50
No - the contract expired by effluxion of time; there was no promise or legitimate expectation of renewal, so no violation occurred
The petitioner served on three-year fixed contracts renewed six times, the last lapsing on 22nd November 2023. She applied for renewal on 31st July 2023 but received no response until the expiry date. The court held the renewal clause was mere procedure, not a mandatory legal requirement, and that expiry of a fixed contract is not unfair termination absent compelling evidence of a legitimate and unquestionable expectation of renewal.
Whether the employer's failure to table the renewal request before the Board or its Committee breached the Terms and Conditions of Service
The clause was procedural only; failure to table the request was not a legal breach
The court construed clause 2.11 and held that the requirement that the Communications Secretary table a renewal request before the Board or its Committee is 'a mere procedure' rather than a legal obligation. Its breach therefore does not found a claim for unlawful non-renewal or constitutional violation, though the court noted the respondent's late response was 'not kind'.
Legal principles established
#- A fixed-term contract that expires by effluxion of time is not terminated, and there is no unfair termination unless there are compelling reasons establishing a legitimate expectation of renewal
- Courts enforce the terms of a contract as written; they cannot rewrite them
- A contractual proviso requiring an employee's renewal request to be tabled before the board is a mere procedure, not a mandatory legal requirement whose breach renders non-renewal unlawful
Court orders
#- 1.All prayers 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 of the petition dated 11th December 2023 are declined
- 2.The petitioner to be given her certificate of service within 14 days if not already given
- 3.Each party to meet their respective costs of the petition
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Employment and Labour Relations Court jurisdiction over employment disputes alleging violation of constitutional rights (Articles 27, 28, 35, 41, 47 and 50)
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Nandwa v National Communication Secretariat (Employment and Labour Relations Petition E235 of 2023) [2024] KEELRC 1889 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). Petition dated 11th December 2023 (ELRC Petition, Nairobi). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2024/1889/eng@2024-07-12
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.